Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    SVTMuscle* is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    7,524

    which has less androgenic properties?

    Deca -Durabolin or Pheraplex... i've been hearing that phera plex has a high amount of andro properties, but also that deca has a low amount...so can those 2 be compared as far as androgenic properties are concerned? or does deca highly outweigh the 2?

  2. #2
    hosam4ever's Avatar
    hosam4ever is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    cairo/egypt
    Posts
    2,724
    deca is not highly androginic at all it is more anabolic if compared with test but i dont know what phereplex is

  3. #3
    shortie's Avatar
    shortie is offline AR Biggerologist
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Back in da box!
    Posts
    3,413
    Phera Plex? Is it a supplement or some kind of UGL designer roid?

  4. #4
    Milky87 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    922
    yes it is a supplement, and aparently very androgenic

  5. #5
    Brent_G's Avatar
    Brent_G is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    466
    isnt it supposed to be the "replacement" for superdrol?

  6. #6
    Logan13's Avatar
    Logan13 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,864

    Pheraplex

    Quote Originally Posted by Brent_G
    isnt it supposed to be the "replacement" for superdrol?
    I thought that Pheraplex was a progestin "Prohormone". Anyone else?

  7. #7
    SVTMuscle* is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    7,524
    phera plex is alot stronger than suprdol so i'm hearing

  8. #8
    Milky87 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    922
    Quote Originally Posted by Logan13
    I thought that Pheraplex was a progestin "Prohormone". Anyone else?
    If it is meant to be a progestin, their chemists dont know what a progestin is (eamning it doesnt have the structure of a prgestin)

    What really gets me stumped is the lack of a C3-ketone for AR binding. I asume that it undergoes epoxidation and the reduction but then all we are left with is 17a-methyl-DHT.

  9. #9
    SVTMuscle* is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    7,524
    ok maybe i should just say which has less side effects!! haha

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •