-
12-27-2005, 11:15 AM #1Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Posts
- 7,379
which has less androgenic properties?
Deca -Durabolin or Pheraplex... i've been hearing that phera plex has a high amount of andro properties, but also that deca has a low amount...so can those 2 be compared as far as androgenic properties are concerned? or does deca highly outweigh the 2?
-
12-27-2005, 05:32 PM #2
-
12-27-2005, 05:49 PM #3
Phera Plex? Is it a supplement or some kind of UGL designer roid?
-
12-27-2005, 09:47 PM #4Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 922
yes it is a supplement, and aparently very androgenic
-
12-27-2005, 10:05 PM #5
isnt it supposed to be the "replacement" for superdrol?
-
12-27-2005, 10:38 PM #6
Pheraplex
Originally Posted by Brent_G
-
12-27-2005, 10:59 PM #7Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Posts
- 7,379
phera plex is alot stronger than suprdol so i'm hearing
-
12-28-2005, 07:57 AM #8Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 922
Originally Posted by Logan13
What really gets me stumped is the lack of a C3-ketone for AR binding. I asume that it undergoes epoxidation and the reduction but then all we are left with is 17a-methyl-DHT.
-
12-28-2005, 08:52 AM #9Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Posts
- 7,379
ok maybe i should just say which has less side effects!! haha
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS