Thread: EQ frontloading?
-
01-03-2006, 03:02 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 31
EQ frontloading?
What are your thoughts on on fronloading the Eq? I`m planning to do a 16 week cycle of 600mg Eq/w with 400mg Test enh. What are the benefits of frontloading the Eq, if there is any?
-
01-03-2006, 03:03 PM #2
yeah some people believe it in because it hits the receptors when they are fresh...ive never done it
anyone??
-
01-03-2006, 03:06 PM #3
I'm going to stay out of the never ending front load debate.But I'll tell you my experience front loading EQ.On my last cycle that had EQ involved in the chemical conglomeration. I front loaded 1600 mgs weekly for 2 weeks.It did absolutely nothing at all.
-
01-03-2006, 03:08 PM #4
I wouldn't really frontload EQ. Also, I would up your test dose.
600mg of that amount of time on EQ is good but I don't see the need to frontload it.
-
01-03-2006, 03:13 PM #5
Not sure about frontloading EQ. It is a long estered AS, so, I guess, fronloading may be an advantage. It will also keep blood levels more stable.
Try frontloading the Test. Double the dosage for the first week, then, carry on at your normal dosage.
There was a good post on frontloading. It stated frontloading will help keep more stable blood levels. I'll try and find it.
-
01-03-2006, 03:56 PM #6
Treat EQ like deca . Always run more test than EQ so you don't get shut down. Yes, EQ will shut you down hard.
-
01-03-2006, 03:59 PM #7Originally Posted by Seattle Junk
-
01-03-2006, 04:02 PM #8Originally Posted by Pinnacle
Anabolic Review Steroid Profile: Equipoise (Boldenone Undeclynate)
Eq will cause a suppression of your hormones, such as endogenous testosterone, so I would also recommend using injectable testosterone in any cycle containing it. Failure to do so could result in possible sexual dysfunction and other sides.
-
01-03-2006, 04:07 PM #9Originally Posted by Seattle Junk
Also,i know a few guys right not that are running very low dose of test along with high dose EQ.None are reporting any libido issues what so ever.Last edited by Pinnacle; 01-03-2006 at 04:09 PM.
-
01-03-2006, 04:08 PM #10
Its suppressive, yes.
But mild compared to the progesterone familly.
-
01-03-2006, 04:10 PM #11Originally Posted by Pinnacle
-
01-03-2006, 04:13 PM #12Originally Posted by Swifto
-
01-03-2006, 04:15 PM #13
I cant see there being much benefit of frontloading eq, its not exactly a potent anabolic thatll blow you up when it kicks in!
-
01-03-2006, 04:16 PM #14Originally Posted by Pinnacle
-
01-03-2006, 04:21 PM #15Originally Posted by Seattle Junk
Those that have those issues have been suppressed more than others,but doesn't show any facts they they were totally shut down.Like I said,suppression and shut down are two different things.I'll look and see if the MODs didn't delete the threads posted by Ross showing the differences.
-
01-03-2006, 04:26 PM #16Originally Posted by Pinnacle
-
01-03-2006, 04:27 PM #17Originally Posted by Asgard
I frontloaded Eq and Test this past cycle. 1500mgs of Test and 1200mgs of Eq the first week then half those doses for about 3 months. I can openly say that I will never do it again. After tons of researching it looked to be effective, but after my run was over I wasnt impressed one bit. Gains came to a quick halt at about week 10 and I actually had itchy nipples. I have never had any signs of Gyno whatsoever. All of that gear frontloaded must have built up way to much Estrogen.
-
01-03-2006, 04:27 PM #18Originally Posted by Seattle Junk
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS