Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Equipoise Only?

  1. #1
    chris2442 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    39

    Equipoise Only?

    I was wondering if any one ahs done any EQ only cycles, and how they went.

  2. #2
    rodge's Avatar
    rodge is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    holland.
    Posts
    2,847
    why would you wanna do that? you need test in every cycle.

    -rodge

  3. #3
    Swifto's Avatar
    Swifto is offline Banned- Scammer!
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,737
    EQ with Test is a great cycle for clean gains. Can be used to cut/bulk with the correct diet.

  4. #4
    Pinnacle's Avatar
    Pinnacle is offline AR-Hall of Famer ~ Cocky motherF*cker!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,558
    Quote Originally Posted by chris2442
    I was wondering if any one ahs done any EQ only cycles, and how they went.
    There are a few guys on the board that are running very low dose Test(250 mgs),with high dose EQ and doing well with it.
    I assume you are afraid of side effects ect and looking to do a novice cycle that is mild in nature?

    ~Pinnacle~

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,901
    Quote Originally Posted by chris2442
    I was wondering if any one ahs done any EQ only cycles, and how they went.
    What research have you done to suggest this will work?

    No test = No cycle......IMO

  6. #6
    chris2442 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    39
    Pinnacle is right, i am afraid of the testicle shrinkage and gyno associated with test, what dose of enanthate would u recommend as a base to an equipoise cycle to minimize these effects?

  7. #7
    rodosman's Avatar
    rodosman is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    170
    EQ only is not very good. My first cycle was an eq cycle only b/c a friend said I would like it. I gained just a little strength and a little mass. You definately need some test in there. An Eq only cycle would be a waste of money imo.

  8. #8
    taiboxa's Avatar
    taiboxa is offline "Vanity Redefined" ~VET~
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,207
    sounds like a waste of money

  9. #9
    AIZ's Avatar
    AIZ
    AIZ is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Holy Land
    Posts
    3,093
    People rave about EQ and I've seen people get great results from it, especially vasularity. However, I ran it with a low dose of test prop (very low dose) and I couldn't deal with the hunger pain. Some reason the hunger got so bad I just function if I didn't eat at least every 30 minutes (and I mean full meals). I switched it with primo. Now I'm running prop/primo and feeling great.

  10. #10
    Animal Cracker's Avatar
    Animal Cracker is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Va Beach
    Posts
    3,658
    Nope...always test! I have done a test only cycle way back in the day, but never an eq or deca only.

  11. #11
    powerliftmike's Avatar
    powerliftmike is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    gates of hell
    Posts
    5,512
    For the record, gyno is not a threat to your health (although I definently wouldnt want it) and can be EASILY prevented thru AIs and SERMs. Stack EQ with 250mg/wk of test if you want minimum.

  12. #12
    Pinnacle's Avatar
    Pinnacle is offline AR-Hall of Famer ~ Cocky motherF*cker!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,558
    Quote Originally Posted by chris2442
    Pinnacle is right, i am afraid of the testicle shrinkage and gyno associated with test, what dose of enanthate would u recommend as a base to an equipoise cycle to minimize these effects?
    250 mgs weekly of enanthate will keep your libido up while experimenting with the EQ cycle.

    ~Pinnacle~

  13. #13
    tranzit is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    1,251
    Aye the bros are right, you gotta kick in at least 250mg of test bro.

  14. #14
    duke911 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    118
    So if you ran this min. of 250 of test e, then how much eq would you run?
    400?

  15. #15
    vizion3 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    18
    in my cycle i did 500mg of sust. and 400mg of equip. /wk, had great results. i started w/200mg of equip. but decided to up it the second wk. most people say you need 400/wk.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the gym
    Posts
    4,195
    Quote Originally Posted by duke911
    So if you ran this min. of 250 of test e, then how much eq would you run?
    400?

    You'd be safe to take it up to 600mg if you wanted to, as long as SOME test is present to keep your system firing and sex drive up your fine. I've gone 800 mg EQ and only 300mg test and I was fine. I prefer to run sustanon w/ the EQ, it doesnt bloat me quite as much as test e or cyp, and on EQ thats a good thing b/ that means I'll just see more veins and look more pumped

  17. #17
    vitor is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    When I do test free cycles, (which I do sometimes to avoid sides like acne), I always use proviron . Works greate for libido, even better than test for me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •