Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    BASK8KACE is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    2,502

    Nolvadex vs. Clomid--this doesn't sound right...

    I read this response in a post recently:
    Originally posted by Jamisun
    Do you have any novaldex? It can be used as a substitute. Nine months bro, thats a long time. You are going to need some kind of anti-e therapy. What ever you do, look out for your health long term. Good luck.
    Is this correct? Can Novaldex be used as a substitue for Clomid?

  2. #2
    Rickson's Avatar
    Rickson is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    5,165
    Yes it can be but most don't feel it is as strong. There are several post on it in the forum recently.

  3. #3
    BASK8KACE is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    2,502
    Thx, Rickson.

    What do you mean by "most don't feel it is as strong?"

  4. #4
    Rickson's Avatar
    Rickson is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    5,165
    Here is Huckleberry Finaplex's explanation over at elite. Thought it was worth a read.

    They both work through primarily the same mechanisms.They are selective estrogen receptor modulators(SERMs).They are both mixed agonists/antagonists.BUT-I believe that they both have strengths,as well as weaknesses.Nolvadex 's strength is undoubtedly its ability to act as an anti-E in mammary tissue.Despite it being an old drug,it may very well still be the best out there for this specific purpose.Nolvadex does have some E blocking capabilities at the hypothalamus,which would give it the ability to catalyze the initialization of testosterone through an increase in gonadotropin-releasing hormone(GnRH).I do however feel that clomid does this even better,as well as it has the ability to bind more strongly to the pituitary and directly cause it to release the secondary(and perhaps most important)hormone in T production-Leutenizing hormone(LH).For this reason,I feel that clomid is a better choice for post-cycle T recovery.

  5. #5
    BASK8KACE is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    2,502
    In that case,

    Can another anti-e be used as a substitue for clomid, such as proviron , which reduces/stops the aromitization process (as opposed to nolvadex which only blocks the estrogen receptors)?

  6. #6
    Jamisun's Avatar
    Jamisun is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    248
    from what i read in the drug profiles and in other places proviron does not help to bring back natural testosterone production. I would like to hear more on that though. I would like to try proviron through the cycle. proviron is an estrogen antagonist, so it prevent aromitization like arimidex . Proviron can be used through post cycle recovery.

  7. #7
    Douglas Quade's Avatar
    Douglas Quade is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    122
    I got this off of cutting edge muscle:

    O.K. You have been on an awesome 4-month cycle of Sustanon and Dianabol . You’ve gained a massive 20 lbs, and are extremely pleased with your results. You can’t stop looking in the mirror. But there is a problem now starting to eat away at you. You are going to run out of steroids very soon (you know you need a break anyway), and your testicles are the size of raisins. Your body is producing less testosterone than a 9-year-old girl, and you are scrambling to figure out what to do to avoid a nasty post-cycle crash that could potentially strip away some of your hard-earned muscle. The opinions on how to restore endogenous testosterone production post-cycle seem to be different everywhere you look. What option is best? Without an understanding of exactly what is going on in your body, and why certain compounds help to correct the situation, choosing the right post-cycle program can be quite confusing. In this article I would therefore like to discuss the role of anti-estrogens and HCG during this delicate window of time, while detailing an effective strategy for their use.



    The Axis



    The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Testicular Axis, or HPTA for short, is the thermostat for your body’s natural production of testosterone. Too much testosterone and the furnace will shut off. Not enough, and the heat is turned up, to put it very simply. For the purposes of our discussion here we can look at this regulating process as having three levels. At the top is the hypothalamic region of the brain, which releases the hormone GnRH (Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone) when it senses a need for more testosterone. GnRH sends a signal to the second level of the axis, the pituitary, which releases Luteinizing Hormone in response. LH for short, this hormone stimulates the testes (level three) to secrete testosterone. The same sex steroids (testosterone, estrogen) that are produced serve to counter-balance things, by providing negative feedback signals (primarily to the hypothalamus and pituitary) to lower the secretion of testosterone when too much of this hormone is sensed. Synthetic steroids, of course, suppress testosterone the same way. This quick background of the testosterone-regulating axis is necessary to furthering our discussion, as we need to first look at the underlying mechanisms involved before we can understand why natural recovery of the HPTA post-cycle is a slow process. Only then can we implement an ancillary drug program to effectively deal with it.



    Testicular Desensitization


    Although steroids suppress testosterone production primarily by lowering the level of gonadotropic hormones discussed above, the big roadblock to a restored HPTA after we come off the drugs is surprisingly not the level of LH itself. This problem is made clearly evident in a study published in Acta Endocrinologica back in 1975(1). Here blood parameters, including testosterone and LH levels, were monitored in male subjects whom were given testosterone enanthate injections of 250mg weekly for 21 weeks. Subjects remained under investigation for an additional 18 weeks after the drug was discontinued. At the start of the study, LH levels became suppressed in direct relation to the rise in testosterone, which is to be expected. Things looked very different, however, once the steroids had been withdrawn (see Figure I). LH levels went on the rise quickly (by the 3rd week), while testosterone barely budged for quite some time. In fact, on average it was more than 10 weeks before any noticeable movement started. This lack of correlation makes clear that the problem in getting androgen levels restored is not the level of LH, but in fact testicular atrophy and desensitization to this hormone. After a period of inactivation the testes have apparently lost mass (atrophied), making them unable to perform the workload required by heightened levels of LH.


    Post-Cycle LH Levels
    http://www.mindandmuscle.net/magazine/images/i7g1.gif

    Post Cycle Testosterone Levels
    http://www.mindandmuscle.net/magazine/images/i7g2.gif


    Figure I. LH and Testosterone measurements starting 1 week after the last injection of 250mg of testosterone enanthate (pretreated measures were 5 mU/ml and 4.5 ng/ml respectively). Note that between weeks 1 and 5, as testosterone levels are declining due to the cessation of exogenous androgen administration, LH levels are already rebounding. From weeks 5 to 10 testosterone levels are at or very near baseline, to spite the substantial LH levels by this point. No significant increase in testosterone is noted until after the 10-week mark.



    The Role of Anti-estrogens


    It is important to understand that anti-estrogens alone do not do much to restore endogenous testosterone release after a cycle. Normally they only foster LH by blocking the negative feedback of estrogens, and we now see that LH rebounds quickly without help anyway. Plus, post cycle there is not an elevated level of estrogen for anti-estrogens to block, as testosterone (now suppressed) is a major substrate used for the synthesis of estrogens in men. Serum estrogen levels will actually be lower here as a result, not higher. Any estrogen rebound that occurs post-cycle likewise happens concurrently with a rebound in testosterone levels, not prior to it (note there is an imbalance in the ratio post cycle, but this is another topic altogether). We are seeing no mechanism in which anti-estrogenic drugs can really help here. We can see why this fact would not be difficult to overlook, however. The medical literature is filled with references showing anti-estrogenic drugs like Clomid and Nolvadex to increase LH and testosterone levels, and in normal situations these drugs do indeed increase endogenous androgen production by blocking the negative feedback of estrogens. Combine this with the fact that just as many studies can be found to show that steroid use lowers LH levels when suppressing testosterone, and we can see how easy it would be to jump to the conclusion that post-cycle we need to focus on restoring LH. We would miss the true problem of testicular desensitization unless we were really looking into the actual recovery rates of the hormones involved. When we do, we immediately see little value in using anti-estrogenic drugs.



    HCG


    So we now see, contrary to the dominating opinion of the times, that anti-estrogens alone will do little to raise testosterone levels in the early weeks of the post-cycle window. This leaves us to focus on a very different level of the HPTA in order to hasten recovery: the testes. For this we will need the injectable drug HCG. If you are not familiar with it, HCG, or Human Chorionic Gonadotropin , is a prescription fertility agent that mimics the bodies own natural LH. Although the testes are equally desensitized to this drug as LH (they both work through the same mechanism), we are administering it as a measured drug and are therefore not constrained by the limits of our own LH production. We similarly can use HCG to provide a bolus dose of LH (of our choosing), which works only to augment the recovering LH levels we already have in the body. In essence we are looking to shock them with an overwhelmingly high level of LH activity, coming from both endogenous and exogenous sources. We want it to reach a level far above what our body, even when supported by anti-estrogens, could possibly do on its own. The result can be a rapid restoration of original testicular mass and functioning, which would allow normal levels of testosterone to be output much sooner than without such an ancillary program. What we are looking at now is HCG actually being the pivotal post-cycle drug, while anti-estrogens are relegated to a supportive role at best.



    Finalizing the Program


    An ideal post-cycle recovery program will focus on two things really. The first is hitting the testes hard with HCG. It is important, however, not to overuse this drug. Taken for too long, or at too high a dosage, the LH receptor will actually become desensitized to LH(2) , which may further exacerbate our post-cycle problem instead of helping it (this is why I am not in favor of regular HCG use on-cycle). My experience with HCG has led me to feel comfortable using it for a course of three weeks, at a dosage of maybe 5000-7500IU weekly. Often the last week I limit the dose to 2,500IU, unless the cycle has been particularly long or potent. This is timed so at least half of the total administered drug dosage will be given when there is still exogenous steroid in the body. On our graph above this would be at about the 3-week mark after the last injection of testosterone. This will give the testes some time to get back into shape before the baseline is actually hit with T levels. Secondly, Anti-estrogens are used to play a supportive role at the same time, so 20mg of Nolvadex or 50-100mg of Clomid would typically be added ( my last article for Mind and Muscle discusses the comparative differences with these two agents). This is to combat the suppressive effects of estrogen as testosterone levels start to go back up, as well as potential side effects (HCG has been shown to increase testicular aromatase activity as well (3)). Although in the first couple of weeks the anti-estrogen does little, it may indeed be helpful when testosterone levels actually start to get back up near normal. To further stimulate the HPTA, and support continuingly high LH levels, the anti-estrogen remains to be used for 2 to 3 weeks after the HCG therapy has been stopped. A sample program, as it would be instituted in our sample post-cycle window, is provided below.
    .....................................

  8. #8
    Douglas Quade's Avatar
    Douglas Quade is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    122
    Sample Post-cycle Plan:


    Week 3: 5000IU HCG total + 20mg Nolvadex daily
    Week 4: 5000IU HCG total + 20mg Nolvadex daily
    Week 5: 2500IU HCG total + 20mg Nolvadex daily
    Week 6: 20mg Nolvadex daily
    Week 7: 20mg Nolvadex daily
    Week 8: 20mg Nolvadex daily



    In Closing


    I hope this article provided a well-needed new look at the mechanisms involved in post-cycle testosterone recovery. Indeed I believe it should debunk a commonly held belief these days, as we seen now that those advocating the sole use of Clomid post cycle are sorely missing the mark. The problem goes much deeper than just getting LH levels back. In fact, we see that LH doesn’t even need much help kicking back into gear, and a drug like Clomid will do very little to help this anyway in the absence of significant estrogen levels anyway. HCG is a drug with undeniable usefulness during the post-cycle window, and many bodybuilders have been much too quick to abandon it. It is truly fundamental to an effective recovery program, and would not consider any dose or combination of anti-estrogens or aromatase inhibitors capable of doing the job without it.


    References:

    1. Effect of long-term testosterone oenanthate administration on male reproductive function: Clinical evaluation, serum FSH, LH, Testosterone and seminal fluid analysis in normal men. J. Mauss, G. Borsch et al. Acta Endocrinol 78 (1975) 373-84

    2. Desensitization to gonadotropins in cultured Leydig tumor cells involves loss of gonadotropin receptors and decreased capacity for steroidogenesis. Freeman DA, Ascoli M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981 Oct;78(10):6309-13

    3. Acute stimulation of aromatization in Leydig Cells by Human Chorionic Gonadotropin In-vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:4460-3,1079

    Check out the original article at http://www.MindandMuscle.net!

    Oh..i forgot to mention it was written by:

    Understanding Post Cycle “T” Recovery
    By William Llewellyn

    dq

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    570
    Excellent Read. Does anyone have any real-life experience on this versus traditional clomid post-cycle therapy?

    I am interested to know if clomid alone as we all have been using it is very effective. This article has me wondering.....

    I think I will try that sample schedule post-cycle, although with a little more HCG and higher nolv/clomid doses since I am going to be on for so long and at such a high dose.

    Later

  10. #10
    Jamisun's Avatar
    Jamisun is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    248
    wow, very informative. That changes how we look at post cycle. Clomid does little to nothing for T recovery according to that article.

  11. #11
    majorpecs's Avatar
    majorpecs is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    2,313
    Blog Entries
    1

    post cycle recovery question

    Wow....awesome posts!! This is something that has kept me away from the gear for so long, worrying about the post cycle crash and losing all I had spent so much time and money on.

    One question if anyone could answer it.....

    If I have never been on the gear before, would I need to be as worried as if this was my 20th cycle?

  12. #12
    Rickson's Avatar
    Rickson is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    5,165
    Bask8,
    True anti-E's only stimulate the FSH while nolva and Clomid stimulate(and or mimic) LH which stimulates leydig cells vital to sperm production. That is why other anti-e's aren't used for that purpose.

    In reading this and other post I have seen HCG become the flavor of the month. This is not a substance to play with and can be very tough on the body post cycle. You will find very few if any endo's who suggest it post cycle. I know Bill Llewellyn's article makes it sound great but please do your research.

  13. #13
    BASK8KACE is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    2,502
    Thanks for a good discussion. Great responses.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •