Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    beachbod is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Central, NJ
    Posts
    73

    ttokkyo eq 200 vs. QV eq 200

    Planning an upcomming bulking cycle and are wondering which type of eq i should use. The two i have access too are ttokkyo eq 200 or QV eq 200. I get them for about the same price. Any suggestions? Thanks bros.

  2. #2
    Greek Oak is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    25
    get the quality vet....thats what im gunna get this weekend from mexico.....

  3. #3
    big N's Avatar
    big N is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    3,137
    pretty much the same thing ,used both with same resaults.matter or of prefference.

  4. #4
    ironfist's Avatar
    ironfist is offline Elite Hall Of Fame ~ RIP ~
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    In a cage near you...
    Posts
    4,721
    Originally posted by big N
    pretty much the same thing ,used both with same resaults.matter or of prefference.
    Bingo...

  5. #5
    Vaj10's Avatar
    Vaj10 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    323
    hey beachbod, id go with the QV like i told you on the phone.. see you in class.

  6. #6
    Tarzan's Avatar
    Tarzan is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    177
    I prefer QV over TT but both are basicly the same.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,612
    I've used the TT at 400mg/wk and was pleased with my results(being my first cycle). TT tends to underfill their vials though so plan on buying that extra one. I've got QV on order right now. I have yet to hear anything negative about them. Good Luck.

  8. #8
    beachbod is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Central, NJ
    Posts
    73
    How underfilled are we usually talking. I am looking to buy 2 10ml bottles at 200mgs. I am getting them for $125, how many cc's have you seen underfilled?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,612
    I originally bought 2 vials. Thats all I needed at 400mg/wk for 10wks. One had about 8.5ml and the other around 9. I had to purchase an extra one to complete my cycle. I've heard them being as low as 8ml. $125 seems a little steep, dude. I could almost buy two for that price.

  10. #10
    still growin is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    mass
    Posts
    647
    Originally posted by 01dragonslayer
    I originally bought 2 vials. Thats all I needed at 400mg/wk for 10wks. One had about 8.5ml and the other around 9. I had to purchase an extra one to complete my cycle. I've heard them being as low as 8ml. $125 seems a little steep, dude. I could almost buy two for that price.

    http://www.anabolicreview.com/vbulle...derfilled+vial

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,612
    I'm am not trying to give TT a bad name. It's an excellent product and like I had mentioned I was very pleased with my results. Made me lean and vascular. But I compared my vials and I've seen pictures where they were filled to different levels. TT is inconsistent in filling their vials

  12. #12
    trimunex's Avatar
    trimunex is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,116
    Hey Bro, just thought I'd say that I recently did research on this same topic before I got my gear. I ended up going with QV, not b/c of bad things said about TT. It was just that there were a lot of good things said about QV. I've only had 2 injects so far, so I don't have enough personal experience to pass along.

    9

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,612
    Exactly, Trimunex. When I first bought my gear QV was barely in the market. There was not enough feedback(opinions). I went with TT b/c of the high mg/ml(alot less injects) and at the time it was one of the best EQ you could buy. Since then QV has made a reputation and I figure "why not"?

  14. #14
    bradbuck is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    34
    Qv workrd better for me than TT.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •