Thread: primo or decca?
03-03-2003, 11:52 AM #1
primo or decca?
I have been considering giving primobolan a try and have been doing some research on it.
Some friends have told me that it is really not worth the cost and that I should go with decca instead.
They have described primo as a lesser version of decca.
( I have yet to try either one so I cannot really compare )
My next cycle will consist of d-bol, sustanon and winny v.
I want to throw in either primo or decca, but not sure (as well, cant afford to pick up both.)
Any thoughts about primo vs decca? if you had to choose one....
Thanks for any input.
03-03-2003, 12:14 PM #2
03-03-2003, 12:44 PM #3
03-03-2003, 01:11 PM #4
primo is expensive, but if you have the money, id go with that. much more quality, keepable gains IMO.
03-04-2003, 07:31 AM #5alevok Guest
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)