High dose eq? yay or nay?

[lavitabella88]

Recently read article that said you don't see the best eq gains till you're between 1500mg-3000mg/wk. What do you guys think? It seemed educated.

[-Ender-]

link the article or paste it in here.

I say no way in hell

[lavitabella88]

Trying to find it. I'll post as soon as i do. It's been eating at me for like a wk

[lavitabella88]

But yeah it said you want your eq to be much higher then test to see best mass gains

[lavitabella88]

www. forbodybuilders. net /2013/01/boldenone -%e2%80%93-realizing-I ts-full-potential/

[lavitabella88]

I had to put spaces in link cause it wouldn't let me post kept saying spam and that i was under 25 posts so you'll have to fully type out if you want to read no spaces

[gixxerboy1]

Eq sucks plain and simple. Even if ur article was correct that is more proof. If u need to run 3 grams of something for results it sucks. And i bet u feel like complete shit at that dose with a sky high rbc

[Turkish Juicer]

People run EQ at higher doses hoping that it will increase appetite, vasodilation and nitrogen-retention (hence protein synthesis which results in gaining of muscle mass).

I completely agree with gixxer's logic here: even if that article is correct about the sky-high dosing of EQ, then this could only be further proof of how useless this compound is on a mg basis.

Also, most people involve EQ in their cycles because it is dirt cheap, but then what is the point of buying so much of something so useless and it is not dirt cheap after all because you need an astronomic amount?

EQ is an oxymoron in itself.

[lavitabella88]

Ha word just wanted to see How you all felt