Thread: Quality of gear= worse sides?
-
06-09-2013, 02:44 PM #1
Quality of gear= worse sides?
So this is more of a general question for knowledge. But will explain why I am asking.
So im now starting my 6th week of a test c and winny cycle. Strength is through the roof. No sides as of yet and blood work next week will show everything. . But my last cycle, was not quality gear, maybe under dosed. which most members here say the brand was normally under dosed. But in about week 5-6 of the previous cycle, I had very sensitive nipples and start of a small lump. But got it under control. and actually top that cycle early because of the issues. It was test e and mast e cycle btw.
Little more info I am using same exact AI for both cycles. Which is Ldex from Ar-r .
So the question just popped into my head today. Would the quality of the gear affect the sides you will have on cycle?
-
06-09-2013, 04:04 PM #2
Depends on if by quality you also mean dosing. If the dose is good then the only side that might be "quality" related would be injection issues such as infections.
-
06-09-2013, 04:22 PM #3
Basically why would estrogen related sides happen on one cycle and not the next. If the only thing changed was brand of gear. That's why I was curious if it could be the quality. I do everything the same for these past two. But the cycle if by far better then last and only 6 weeks in. Was just wondering is all. Not complaining at all
-
06-09-2013, 04:31 PM #4
IMO there are way too many external factors that determine side effects on cycle that most people attribute to their gear.
-
06-09-2013, 11:56 PM #5
The other stuff may have contained more or less test than it claimed, or something else in place of masteron . This would affect your estrogen levels.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
04-23-2024, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS