Thread: why prop for cutting?
-
05-28-2003, 06:23 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- tx
- Posts
- 9
why prop for cutting?
why is prop the type of test that is normally suggested for a cutting cycle? why not enan or other longer acting ester test?
-
05-28-2003, 06:24 PM #2
You have less bloat with prop, the shorter the ester the less bloat, this is nice when you are cutting, you don't want to much estrogen water bloat.
Pain
-
05-28-2003, 06:55 PM #3Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- ohio
- Posts
- 459
i know why they say it but i have been thinking why does it matter if you have alittle bloat take some anti e's if its that big of a deal and the bloat will go away anyway after your off cycle
i havent saw any kind of proof other than preference
JLI
-
05-28-2003, 07:06 PM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 1,071
Another reason is because most cutting anabolics have to be injected ed or eod anyways (example: fina, winny).... so they just stack the prop in the same syringe. Bloat is the main reason though, not everyone wants to get liquidex.
-
05-28-2003, 07:43 PM #5
Why would you want spend that much extra money on anti e's when you can just change your gear. Whois has a good point about usually stacking with fina and winny too.
Pain
-
05-28-2003, 08:38 PM #6
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Next cycle... Just...
Yesterday, 08:17 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS