nolvadex and clomid- increase of the body's own testosterone production

Ok guys, I've thought about this awhile back but just now remembered After reading( http://anabolicreview.com/vbulletin/...=&threadid=646 ) this post I need a couple of questions answered we know that clomid and nolvadex are both anti-estrogen pills and a 50mg clomid pill has close to the same power as a 20mg nolvadex pill does as far as estrogen related issue go. My question is this I can get nolvadex super super cheap compared to clomid and I would like to know if nolvadex/tamoxifen stimulates the hypophysis to release more gonadotropin so that a faster and higher release of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone happens and in terms increases the body's own testosterone production. If so at what mg vs mg would be needed because lets say on clomid post therapy if usally you need 300-100-50 for treatment how much would I need of tamoxifen to do the same thing. I hope This isn't confusing it's just away I can save money if this is an accurate assumption, to show you how much I payed for clomid think 30 pills for 130bucks vs 90 tamoxifens pills for 39 bucks.

Thanks my fellow bros:hello: :lift:

there are soooo many damn different opinions on anti E's (i,e nolvacex and clomid) on this site that I'm confused!!!!

I've searched the educational forums and still dont have a clear answer.

By the way Pump N Swole .... can you change your avatar please!?!?!?
Everytime I see it I wanna go spank the monkey!!! she's so hot!!! :dg:

Yeah, it's a big mess of info... no one know's what to believe.

At any rate, you are getting screwed on the clomid pricing. I get 100 tabs for $40.... 30 tabs for $130 is VERY bad bro. Your source must not get much business.

Whats the confusion?

20mg nolva = 50mg clomid NO WAY!

Clomid is a very weak anti-estrogen. Nolva is considerably more effective. Id have to guess but id say maybe 5-10mg Nolva = 50mg Clomid.

Nolva can restore natural test levels via negative feedback. That means it lowers estrogen, so the body raises it back by first increasing test, which then will aromatize to estrogen.

Clomid does this also (not as strongly) but it also stimulates the HTPA as well causing LH release.

Alone, Ill take clomid over it any day. Nolva took alot longer by itelf, but didnt have the weird clomid feelings with it.

IN choice, I always run both.

Ok so billy if I was only wanting to use tamoxifen for post cycle like I'd use clomid for how many tablets would I need to equal the same effect.

Note: this isn't for anti -es its for bring back natural test.
Thanx man

I don't know what to think anymore on PCT but I'm going to run both nolvadex and clomid for PCT and keep my fingers crossed.

if your nolva is that cheap, i'd stick with just that. I've used nolva by itself, and liked it better. I don't like clomid, i feel odd, i get more acne and i really didn't think clomid was even more effective in getting my body back to normal more quickly than nolva. The problem is there is no scientific study on to really determine which is the best for us, bodybuilders. I don't think that just because we've always used clomid, that we should continue to use it. remember, in the old days deca and dbol was the "best" cycle. Times change, and so does science.....

anyway, here's an article i found. I'm sorry, I don't have the source of the quote. I'm not sure if I should post up other people's articles, but it is interesting, and might shed some more light.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

While practically similar compounds in structure, few people ever really consider Clomid and Nolva to be similar. Its not just a common myth in steroid circles, but even in the medical community. This misconception originates from their completely different uses. Nolvadex is most commonly used for the treatment of breast cancer in women, while clomid is generally considered a fertility aid. In bodybuilding circles, from day one, clomid has generally been used as post-cycle therapy and Nolvadex as an anti-estrogen.

But as I intend to demonstrate this is in essence the same. I believe the myth to have originated because Nolva is clearly a more powerful anti-estrogen, and the people selling clomid needed another angle to sell the stuff, so it was mostly used as a post-cycle aid. But few users really understand how clomid (and also Nolvadex, logically) works to bring back natural testosterone in the body after the conclusion of a cycle of androgenic anabolic steroids. After a cycle is over, the level of androgens in the body drop drastically. The body compensates with an overproduction of estrogen to keep steroid levels up. Estrogen as well inhibits the production of natural testosterone, and in the period between the return of natural testosterone and the end of a cycle, a lot of mass is lost. So its in everybody's best interest to bring back natural test as soon as humanly possible. Clomid and Nolvadex will reduce the post-cycle estrogen, so that a steroid deficiency is constated and the hypothalamus is stimulated to regenerate natural testosterone production in the body. That's basically how the mechanism works, nothing more, nothing less.

Both compounds are structurally alike, classified as triphenylethylenes. Nolvadex is clearly the stronger component of the two as it can achieve better results in decreasing overall estrogen with 20-40 mg a day, than clomid can in doses of 100-150 mg a day. A noteworthy difference. Triphenylethylenes are very mild estrogens that do not exert a lot, if any activity at the estrogen receptor, but are still highly attracted to it. As such they will occupy the receptor and keep it from binding estrogens. This means they do not actively work to reduce estrogen in the body like Proviron, Viratase or arimidex would (by competing for the aromatase enzyme), but that it blocks the receptor so that any estrogen in the body is basically inert, because it has no receptor to bind to.

This has advantages and disadvantages. The disadvantage is that when use is discontinued, the estrogen level is still the same and new problems will develop much sooner. The advantage is that it works much faster and has results sooner than with an aromatase blocker like Proviron or arimidex. Therefor, when problems such as gynocomastia occur during a cycle of steroids one will usually start 20 mg/day of Nolva or 100 mg/day of clomid straight away, in conjunction with some Proviron or arimidex. The proviron or arimidex will actively reduce estrogen while the clomid or Nolvadex will solve your ongoing problem straight away. This way, when use is discontinued there is no immediate rebound.

So which one should you use? Well personally, I'd have to say Nolvadex. Both as an on-cycle anti-estrogen and a post-cycle therapy. As an anti-estrogen its simply much stronger, demonstrated by the fact that better results are obtained with 20-40 mg than with 100-150 mg of clomid. For post-cycle, this plays a key role as well. It deactivates rebound estrogen much faster and more effective. But most importantly, Nolvadex has a direct influence on bringing back natural testosterone, where as clomid may actually have a slight negative influence. The reason being that Tamoxifen (as in Nolvadex) seems to increase the responsiveness of LH (luteinizing hormone) to GnRH (gonadtropin releasing hormone), whereas clomid seems to decrease the responsiveness a bit1.

Another noteworthy fact about Nolvadex is that it acts more potently as an estrogen in the liver. As you remember, I mentioned that clomiphene and tamoxifen are basically weak estrogens. Well, tamoxifen is apparently still quite potent in the liver. This offers us the positive benefits of this hormone in the liver, while avoiding its negative effects elsewhere in the body. As such Nolvadex can have a very positive impact on negative cholesterol levels2 in the body, and therefore too should be considered a better choice than clomid. It will not solve the problem of bad cholesterol levels during Steroid use, but will help to contain the problem to a larger degree.

Another reason why I promote the use of Nolvadex over Clomid post-cycle (as if being 3-4 times stronger and having more of a direct effect on restoring natural test wasn't enough) is because it's a lot safer. Not just because it improves lipid profiles, but also because it simply doesn't have the intrinsic side-effects that Clomid has. Clomid causes more acne for sure, but that's mainly because you need to use a 3-4 times higher dose. But Clomid seems to also affect the eyesight. Long-term clomid therapy causes irreversible changes in eyesight3 in users. Irreversible. For me that alone is reason enough to prefer Nolvadex.

Lastly, one should be aware that use of these compounds can reduce the gains made on steroids. Nolvadex more so than clomid, simply because it is stronger. Estrogen is responsible for a number of anabolic factors such as increasing growth hormone output, upgrading the androgen receptor and improving glucose utilization. This is why aromatizing steroids like testosterone are still best suited for maximum muscle gain. When reducing the estrogen levels, we therefore reduce the potential gains being made. For this reason one may opt to try clomid during a cycle instead of Nolvadex. Although I would imagine that the problem that needed solved would be of more concern, in which case Nolva remains the weapon of choice. It's a plain fact that there is a high correlation between gains and side-effects. Either you go for maximum gains and tolerate the side-effects, or you reduce the side-effects, and with it the gains. That's life, nothing is free.

Stacking and Use:

If problems of Gynocomastia or other estrogen related symptoms tend to pop up during a cycle the use of 20-30 mg of Nolvadex or 100 mg of Clomid daily should easily contain the problem, and be used until a few days after the problem subsides. For best results and the least amount of problems upon cessation it is best stacked with Proviron (50 mg) or arimidex (0.5 mg) for this duration as well. Its not advised that these products be ran concomitantly with the steroid for the entire duration of the stack, as this will reduce your gains. Instead cease the usage of anti-estrogens once the problem is contained, and should the problem resurface, simply recommence the use of the products in the same manner as described above.

Once a cycle of steroids is concluded one should always initiate a post-cycle therapy to help bring back natural testosterone as soon as possible. This will help you to retain the mass you gained. How this is done depends highly on the type of steroid used. If only orals were used, therapy should start immediately, even the last day of the stack. If short-acting esters or water-based injectables were used, therapy should commence within 4-7 days after last injection, and if long-acting esters were used then it should commence 1.5 to 2 weeks after the last injection was given. The length of the therapy will vary as well, from 3-5 weeks. The longer acting the product was, the longer therapy should be continued to make sure all suppressive factors are cleared before use of Clomid/Nolvadex is discontinued.

For best results, it is best stacked with HCG (Human Chorionic gonadotrophin), which functions as an LH analog and can help bring testicle size back up. HCG use starts the last week of a cycle, and on from there every 5-6 days (usually 1500-3000 IU) and discontinued 1.5 to weeks prior to the cessation of Nolvadex/clomid. The reason being that HCG itself is also suppressive of natural testosterone and should be out of the body before therapy is over, or it will inhibit natural testicle function. But I can not stress enough that HCG possibly plays a more important role in post-cycle therapy than clomid/Nolvadex. For Clomid and Nolvadex, doses are usually tapered down. Its best to start with 40-50 mg of Nolvadex or 150 mg of Clomid for the first week or the first two weeks, and then finish the program with 20-25 mg of Nolvadex or 100 mg of Clomid for an additional two weeks.

Here is a good review by Bill L, along with appropriate literature references:
http://magazine.mindandmuscle.net/pa...D=72&issueID=6

I will just add the comment that since both drugs being structurally similar do seem to have the same adverse effects on vision when taken long term. Don't be mislead that one is safer vs. the other. Also, don't blow this ADE out of proportion, but just be aware that it does exist and has been reported in many studies and lit. reviews.

Yes, Ive read that before quiet a long time ago. That's what gave me the idea in the first place. I'd like to here what others users think as well So I'm going to BUMP

Thx for reply
:hello:

Quote:

Originally posted by ichabodcrane
Here is a good review by Bill L, along with appropriate literature references:
http://magazine.mindandmuscle.net/pa...D=72&issueID=6

I will just add the comment that since both drugs being structurally similar do seem to have the same adverse effects on vision when taken long term. Don't be mislead that one is safer vs. the other. Also, don't blow this ADE out of proportion, but just be aware that it does exist and has been reported in many studies and lit. reviews.

another great read man, and yes he preferred nolva over clomid as well I didnt see anything about a adverse effects on vision but I'm not saying it's not possible either. Thx for the great read man

Bump

Pump-N-Swole:
I wish i could read your post but I can't pry my eyes off your avatar.
Sorry.:unsure:

awesome :dg: