Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By ScotchGuard02
  • 1 Post By PT1982

Thread: Test E, Test P, or Test P NPP cycle. Been off 7 years.

  1. #1
    eslim is online now New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    22

    Test E, Test P, or Test P NPP cycle. Been off 7 years.

    Hello everyone. Advise would be much appreciated. Here is a little background info. Back in 2006-2007 I ran two Test E cycles while in the Marine Corps. I ran both cycles for 10 weeks at 500mg. I didn't know anything about an AI or PCT back then. I saw great gains back then but it was hard to maintain while training and going to the field. It was hard to eat right and enough. After I got out life got in the way and stopped lifting the same. I have always continued to go but not with the same frequency. Past year and a half I have been training hard and eating right.
    I am 31, 5'9" at 200 lbs. Im guessing bf 18%. I have done a lot of research and read through hundreds of these forum posts and stickies. I was initially planning on doing a Test Prop NPP cycle dosed at 100mg eod for both, test for 10 weeks and npp for 8 weeks. The more I read the more I question if that is the right thing to do. Would adding the npp result in any more bennefit for me? I have the test prop and npp on hand as well as an ai, caber, and nolva clomid HCG .
    One more question. If it is recommended that I run Test only again would running 100mg eod be comparable to test E at 500 mg once a week? Thanks guys and sorry for the long post.

  2. #2
    Mr. Small's Avatar
    Mr. Small is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    323
    Probably say that Test only would be enough and keep the NPP for a later date. You would need to run 150mg of Prop every second day to get a weekly total of 500mg

  3. #3
    eslim is online now New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    22
    I understand the math. 150mg of prop would be 525mg. Several sources state prop is more potent due to the shorter ester attached. Not sure how much of a difference this makes however.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,952
    Prop is absorbed into the body faster then Enth. Test is Test no matter what ester it's riding.
    ghettoboyd likes this.

  5. #5
    songdog's Avatar
    songdog is online now ARs TOP DOG ~ MONITOR ~
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    12,116
    I would suggest test only at this time and get that bf down before you cycle chances are it's higher than you think and this could cause you E2 problems.

  6. #6
    PT1982 is online now Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Home of the Braves
    Posts
    853
    As long as you now know about AIs, hcg , and pct now, go for it. You have experience with test, so if it works, do t fix it. Prop might be a fun one for you to try just because how quickly the results come on. It's almost like a different compound because of it. I'd say you sold yourself short at 10 weeks with enanthate , but 10 weeks with prop will be just right . And I'm fighting against recommending NPP. I. Just. Control. My. Urges.... lol. It's my favorite steroid , so I get a little (ok, a lottle) emotional about it.
    bizzarro likes this.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,952
    Quote Originally Posted by eslim View Post
    Hello everyone. Advise would be much appreciated. Here is a little background info. Back in 2006-2007 I ran two Test E cycles while in the Marine Corps. I ran both cycles for 10 weeks at 500mg. I didn't know anything about an AI or PCT back then. I saw great gains back then but it was hard to maintain while training and going to the field. It was hard to eat right and enough. After I got out life got in the way and stopped lifting the same. I have always continued to go but not with the same frequency. Past year and a half I have been training hard and eating right.
    I am 31, 5'9" at 200 lbs. Im guessing bf 18%. I have done a lot of research and read through hundreds of these forum posts and stickies. I was initially planning on doing a Test Prop NPP cycle dosed at 100mg eod for both, test for 10 weeks and npp for 8 weeks. The more I read the more I question if that is the right thing to do. Would adding the npp result in any more bennefit for me? I have the test prop and npp on hand as well as an ai, caber, and nolva clomid HCG .
    One more question. If it is recommended that I run Test only again would running 100mg eod be comparable to test E at 500 mg once a week? Thanks guys and sorry for the long post.
    This post is pretty much the standard read. My First Cycle: Planning and Executing a Successful First Cycle

  8. #8
    Gymratgus is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    6
    We can't forget you ran test E in your younger days. You need more than that to lower that BF and gain muscle at age 31 though! That's personal preference on test E, P or NPP. Faster esters than Test E and C so you need to pin it more often EOD or ED to maintain stable Test Levels. I'm a Test E or C kind of guy lately doctors want to prescribe test P and that's like everyday type test. And I still enjoy Test E or C
    Last edited by Gymratgus; 05-18-2017 at 08:39 PM.

Bonus: Download this free Ultimate Research Guide
To Anabolic Steroids that will show you to choose the best steroids for your goals, the best cycles and more. It is 396 pages of knowledge at your fingertips.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •