Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Mr. Sparkle's Avatar
    Mr. Sparkle is offline Slinabolic Vet / Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lovin Alba's butt
    Posts
    3,008

    cycle for 3 weeks on 6 off, 3 on 6 off?? huh?

    I was reading around today on ******. there is an old issue and its talking about going on for 3 weeks, but taking an ample amount. gaining 5 solid pounds every time you cycle. but over the coarse of time you will gain 15 to 20 lbs and keep it. one reason there is not as much of a shock on your body, and all kinds of stuff. no depression, and its easier on your organs...
    http://www.******.com/nation_previous/98.html
    there is the page, and its in issue no. 18 called " steroids for health. "
    just wondering what yall think, its a long article. it goes against a lot of the stuff I know... so do you think there would be a benefit from cycling this way?

  2. #2
    BDTR's Avatar
    BDTR is offline Retired
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    10,363
    Most of the gain will be water weight, not to mention you're putting your body on a hormonal roller coaster of sorts. Not worth it.

  3. #3
    motoxxxguy's Avatar
    motoxxxguy is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    2,630
    There has been a lot of debate on this subject. Do a search on "short cycles" and you'll see a ton of info and thoughts on the sunject.

    It sounds like a plausable idea, using short-estered, fast-acting drugs for short periods. The idea is that your body shouldn't shut down hard in a short period of time, thus making recovery easier. It should also reduce a lot of the side effects related to rapid growth like high BP, insomnia, stretch marks, etc. The thing is, you must be patient and wait for the gains to come to you.

    -moto

  4. #4
    Mr. Sparkle's Avatar
    Mr. Sparkle is offline Slinabolic Vet / Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lovin Alba's butt
    Posts
    3,008
    being patient is no big deal, for me anyway. what would be some short esters??

  5. #5
    skii96's Avatar
    skii96 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    A cage in the Zoo!
    Posts
    677
    If cost wasnt a factor for me, i think i would try this out but modify it a little. 4wks on 3wks off. Doing things like prop, suspension, fina, winny, dbol drol, var etc then on the 3 wks off using HCG , clomid and novladex, then hopping back on and switching up the compounds. Using this method for 1yr or so would definitly pack on some good mass supposing your diet is good.

  6. #6
    Mr. Sparkle's Avatar
    Mr. Sparkle is offline Slinabolic Vet / Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lovin Alba's butt
    Posts
    3,008
    so would a enanthate , deca be a good one to try for 3-4 weeks?

  7. #7
    motoxxxguy's Avatar
    motoxxxguy is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    2,630
    Quote Originally Posted by LeanedOut
    so would a enanthate, deca be a good one to try for 3-4 weeks?
    Not at all. Both of those are long esters, minimum 10-12 weeks for those compounds.

    -moto

  8. #8
    skii96's Avatar
    skii96 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    A cage in the Zoo!
    Posts
    677
    Quote Originally Posted by LeanedOut
    so would a enanthate, deca be a good one to try for 3-4 weeks?
    THe compounds i listed and a few more would be what you're looking for.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •