Printable View
Question, gonna be running a cycle here shortly, Test and EQ. I'm looking at two options:
1. 16 weeks, Test @ 500mg/week & EQ @ 400mg/week
2. 20 weeks, Test @ 400mg/week & EQ @ 300mg/week
Which one would give me greater and more lasting gains?
Peace
-Taejoon
I'd go with #1
#1 is what I was planning originally, but I've been doing a lot of reading on low-dose-long cycles and a lot of it makes sense. Concentrating more on your diet, rest and lifting routine than on the drugs you're taking. just wanted to see what peoples thoughts were.
Peace
-Taejoon
Personally, I like both of them. They are both, in my opinion, good time lenths. I like being on longer, so I might tend to lean towards #2. It's a depressing day when you draw that last drop out and know that the fun is over. So, I like the idea of putting it off for as long as possible. Not sure that either way will have any certain benefits over the other though. Maybe someone else can give an educated reason vs a pschological reason.
peace,
ttgb
Yea, I don't like coming off either :( , but it's something you have to do soonner or later. Personally, I'd rather have to do it later than sooner, but only if I'm going to keep growing while I'm staying on.