View Poll Results: Do injections of water-soluble compounds encourage local muscle growth?

Voters
3. You may not vote on this poll

  • No- I've tried it and I personally think spot injections are a waste.

    0 0%

  • No- Its not scientifically feasible (please explain).

    2 66.67%

  • Yes- I've tried it and it worked for me (please explain).

    1 33.33%

  • Yes- I don't know from personal experience, but it seems reasonable.

    0 0%
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. 11-07-2003, 01:45 AM #1
    animal013's Avatar
    animal013
    animal013 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    72

    Do injections of water-soluble compounds encourage local muscle growth?

    Well, what do you guys think? I'm sticking myself with winny every day in different places in hopes that this is true. I understand the argument against esterified compounds in oils- the oil sits in fat deposits and as the ester breaks off, the compound is gradually released into the blood stream. But this doesn't happen with water-soluble compounds like winny and test suspension. It is available for use by the muscle immediately upon injection, so it stands to reason that the muscle into which it is injected would recieve the most receptor stimulation.

    But I'm no biology major. Lemme know what you think.
    Last edited by animal013; 11-07-2003 at 01:49 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 11-07-2003, 01:57 AM #2
    asymmetrical1's Avatar
    asymmetrical1
    asymmetrical1 is offline Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,184
    Quote Originally Posted by Kev013
    Well, what do you guys think? I'm sticking myself with winny every day in different places in hopes that this is true. I understand the argument against esterified compounds in oils- the oil sits in fat deposits and as the ester breaks off, the compound is gradually released into the blood stream. But this doesn't happen with water-soluble compounds like winny and test suspension. It is available for use by the muscle immediately upon injection, so it stands to reason that the muscle into which it is injected would recieve the most receptor stimulation.

    But I'm no biology major. Lemme know what you think.
    No localized growth...Just swelling of muscle fascia
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 11-07-2003, 01:57 AM #3
    50%Natural's Avatar
    50%Natural
    50%Natural is offline Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    4,010
    It is not true. This is a very commonly asked question. I will give you the link to the page I give everyone when this question arises.
    http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/catwinstrol.htm
    Hope this helps you.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 11-07-2003, 02:10 AM #4
    somedude247's Avatar
    somedude247
    somedude247 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    901
    mostly water retention in the muscle area u are injecting into, but looks bigger while on the cycle none the less.....ladies love it !!!!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules