primo v deca

**emu** · 11-29-2003, 07:01 PM

if you were to use primo at 100 mg a week or deca at 250-300mg a week i know the gains would be slow but do you lose any mass or strength. i heard there both real quality gaining drugs. which one is better for not losing the gains post cycle?

**BigGreen** · 11-29-2003, 07:11 PM

In my signature you'll see links to an "All about Primo" thread and a "Deca vs. Eq" thread. I'd suggest these two threads as starting points for you to begin to form an opinion and to additionally begin to form more specific questions regarding the two substances.

**murph** · 11-29-2003, 07:54 PM

well the two are not the same at all... to compare them, isnt fair,.. in my opinion,......i have found that primo will do good even on a lower calorie diet.... while to get results from deca you need to really eat alot more,..... i think i would follow BigGreens sugestion and read up on them a little more,...thanks...

**legend** · 11-30-2003, 10:12 AM

they are both great chemicals, but your comparing apples and oranges here. read big greens threads. personally i prefer deca over eq. but thats because i am not prone to deca sides. primo is excellent but i feel you need to do alot more to see great results.

**Animal Cracker** · 12-01-2003, 03:40 AM

exactly...apples and oranges.

**TheSevnthWarrior** · 12-01-2003, 05:15 PM

I love 'em both, however with the exception of their Anabolic nature, they are very differrent.

**Dude-Man** · 12-02-2003, 09:12 PM

eq vs primo is a more comparable duo.

**TheSevnthWarrior** · 12-02-2003, 10:21 PM

Originally Posted by chrisAdams

eq vs primo is a more comparable duo.

I can't argue with that, however, strangely enough, Primo can be (and often is) mistaken for Deca (and visa versa) in drug tests, yet all 3 seem to share just enough of each other's characteristics to keep them forever linked in the BB community.