Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    Mr. Sparkle's Avatar
    Mr. Sparkle is offline Slinabolic Vet / Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lovin Alba's butt
    Posts
    3,008

    Question PCT, prop and deca, run prop longer....?

    Why not run the prop two and a half weeks after the last shot of deca ? Then they are both ending on close to the same day, so start PCT 4 days after prop. That would make it a total of 3 weeks after last deca shot. That way PCT would be better becuase the crash of deca is not as bad or not even there. Any thoughts on this? I am asking to see if there is a way to make getting off of deca easier.

    -MS

  2. #2
    DANballs is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Sparkle
    Why not run the prop two and a half weeks after the last shot of deca ? Then they are both ending on close to the same day, so start PCT 4 days after prop. That would make it a total of 3 weeks after last deca shot. That way PCT would be better becuase the crash of deca is not as bad or not even there. Any thoughts on this? I am asking to see if there is a way to make getting off of deca easier.

    -MS
    THE TIMES I RAN DECA I DID JUST THAT, RAN TEST LIKE 2 WEEKS AFTER TO MAKE RECOVERY EASIER.IVE ALSO ENDED THEM BOTH AT THE SAME TIME AND RECOVERY WAS A B**CH D

  3. #3
    fame2002 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    100
    that is the way to go bro, i do all of my cycles like that.

  4. #4
    Mr. Sparkle's Avatar
    Mr. Sparkle is offline Slinabolic Vet / Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lovin Alba's butt
    Posts
    3,008
    cool, then ill probally do it this way

  5. #5
    asymmetrical1's Avatar
    asymmetrical1 is offline Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,188
    prop and deca ..interesting combo

  6. #6
    Mr. Sparkle's Avatar
    Mr. Sparkle is offline Slinabolic Vet / Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lovin Alba's butt
    Posts
    3,008
    why do you say that?

  7. #7
    Pheedno is offline Respected Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Miller's Crossing
    Posts
    6,282
    With active life times, I would suggest running the prop 5wks past the deca . You'd have to run it 3wks past to match up the active life, and as DAN said, running test so that the Deca is tapered out a couple wks before hand is best for recovery

  8. #8
    Mr. Sparkle's Avatar
    Mr. Sparkle is offline Slinabolic Vet / Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lovin Alba's butt
    Posts
    3,008
    so you think i should take it 5 weeks past? would it be that bad if i did it the way i was planning? not trying to be a dick jw

  9. #9
    asymmetrical1's Avatar
    asymmetrical1 is offline Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,188
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Sparkle
    so you think i should take it 5 weeks past? would it be that bad if i did it the way i was planning? not trying to be a dick jw
    run it like pheed says

  10. #10
    Pheedno is offline Respected Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Miller's Crossing
    Posts
    6,282
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Sparkle
    so you think i should take it 5 weeks past? would it be that bad if i did it the way i was planning? not trying to be a dick jw
    If you ran the way you had it planned, it would be like running Cyp and Deca both to 10wks as opposed to running the Cyp 2wks past.

    Prop has an active life of 4.5 days while Deca is about 18. The deca will just be leaving your system if you run the prop 3wks past. 5wks past will have the Deca tapered out for 2wks before the prop is.

    Example
    wk1-10 Deca
    wk1-15 Prop

    wk1-10 Deca
    wk1-12 Cyp

    wk1-10 Deca
    wk1-13 Enan

    Running it two wks past in accordance to the test ester

  11. #11
    Mr. Sparkle's Avatar
    Mr. Sparkle is offline Slinabolic Vet / Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lovin Alba's butt
    Posts
    3,008
    So to keep more gains, run the prop 5 weeks after the deca ? I dont have enough prop to do this. I always read to just run deca a week less than the test. then I thought about the active life... and thats why I asked what I did

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Rhelm of Disarray
    Posts
    2,292
    "Pheedno is a Male escort for hire. I prefer big hairy men as clients but with enough money anything is possible. Please PM me for info"
    Yeah I'm calling about the Escor.....oh, PM...Sorry

  13. #13
    Pheedno is offline Respected Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Miller's Crossing
    Posts
    6,282
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSevnthWarrior
    "Pheedno is a Male escort for hire. I prefer big hairy men as clients but with enough money anything is possible. Please PM me for info"
    Yeah I'm calling about the Escor.....oh, PM...Sorry

    Holy ****, I just noticed that.

    RON, or CYC, you are all ****ed, I mean phucked

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Rhelm of Disarray
    Posts
    2,292
    Quote Originally Posted by Pheedno
    Holy ****, I just noticed that.

    RON, or CYC, you are all ****ed, I mean phucked
    LOL.....Yup, Ron's the first one I thought of

  15. #15
    Pac8541's Avatar
    Pac8541 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    a catbox full of shit
    Posts
    205
    I came across this old thread while doing a search and noticed Pheedno's recommendation to run prop 5 weeks past the last deca inj. prior to starting pct. More recent threads haven't mentioned this protocol (that I've seen) and I'm wondering if this is still accepted as the best way to cycle these compounds.

  16. #16
    Pac8541's Avatar
    Pac8541 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    a catbox full of shit
    Posts
    205
    I ran across this older thread during a search and noticed Pheedno's recommendation to run prop 5 weeks past the last deca inj. Most everything I've been able to find concerning this recommends going only 2 weeks past. I'm wondering if Pheedno's +5 protocol is still accepted as being the best way to run these compounds. Its been a while since this was posted so I wanted to see if this is still valid... Thanks.

  17. #17
    Pac8541's Avatar
    Pac8541 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    a catbox full of shit
    Posts
    205
    Shit, sorry for the double post.

  18. #18
    Swifto's Avatar
    Swifto is offline Banned- Scammer!
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,737
    Quote Originally Posted by Pac8541
    Shit, sorry for the double post.
    Whilst there is no scientific studies/theories to confrim it, some report PCT is easier when dropping off the 19-Nor (Deca , Tren ) a few weeks proir to beginning PCT. 5 weeks would be about right IMHO.

    Never done it personally. But some users state it aids in recovery.

  19. #19
    Pac8541's Avatar
    Pac8541 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    a catbox full of shit
    Posts
    205
    Ok. Had planned on running it 2 weeks past anyway but the 5 week protocol was intriguing and seems to make sense. Thanks for the response.

  20. #20
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline AR-Platinum Elite- Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    37,395
    Yes recovery is far easier if you run the test past the deca , noramlly id use 2-5 weeks which works great for me.
    *Anyone wanting a source check from a willing vet/mod must first acquire 100 posts and 45 days of activity*

    “Carrying a set to a point where you are forced to utilize 100 percent of your momentary ability is the single most important factor in increasing size and strength"--- Mike Mentzer

    “one set to failure is all that is required to stimulate an increase in strength and size – with no number of lesser sets having the same effect” – Mike Mentzer

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •