Thread: 2 week cycles
01-08-2004, 11:15 PM #1
2 week cycles
what are your comments about 2 weeks on, 4 weeks off cycles. Ive researched this theory and it makes some good points about not getting a crappy lipid profile, you can make gains in the 4 weeks off becuase even though your test levels are supressed, within a week they rebound to higher than they were before the cycle, so u can make gains in the off period as well. It also talks about this method as gradual, meaning in a year youll pack 20 poulnds on, becuase in a normal cycle youll pack anywhere from 15-30 poulnds of fat, muscle water, but anything made this rapidly is meant to be lost but while on the 2 weeker, you will keep it. of course you would have to use fast acting esters and such.
01-08-2004, 11:18 PM #2
No sense dude. They're going to be supressed either way brah. Might as well run 6 weeks on, 6 weeks off and use short esters.
But I'm an advocate of long cycles anyways.
01-08-2004, 11:22 PM #3
Bruce why did you leave demi... You let her go didn't you..lol.. I've read about this before key word read, i have yet to see any proof about this... In theory it makes sense... I think you would have to have such a disciplined cycle/diet/training...for it to actually work... I think its shakey... As far as the tradional 8-12 weeker, there are a ton of success stories from this board alone that is evidence enough that what works.. works...
01-08-2004, 11:24 PM #4
ive heard many success stories, but ive also heard people loosing most of their gains on proper pct or after pct
01-08-2004, 11:34 PM #5Swellin GuestOriginally Posted by Bruce willis
Another explanation could be a poorly planned cycle.
I have seen this asked quite a few times, but I have never seen anyone (with experience) back it.
01-08-2004, 11:36 PM #6
i mean i prefer the long cycle, but after you are finished and on pct, realistically how much do u expect to keep and what happens when u et sick say 3 weeks after pct and loose alot of weight?
01-08-2004, 11:41 PM #7
but speaking scientifically, with extreme motivation do u think someone can still make minimal gains during pct?
01-08-2004, 11:46 PM #8
Scientificly...make gains no...Unless it's proven somewhere... I can't see making gains... I can see recovering, and keeping gains... The difference between making gains natural, and making gains on cycle is night and day bro...your body grows at such a faster rate, and recovers at such a rate that if i had to compare it the gains you make and keep in 10 weeks on sauce you couldn't make in a year natural...if done correctly...
01-08-2004, 11:58 PM #9
do u see someone keepin 100 percent of their gains during pct, becuase during pct they kept proper nutrition and training as when they were on the cycle?
01-09-2004, 12:14 AM #10Originally Posted by Bruce willis
01-09-2004, 12:19 AM #11
the two week idea is pretty weak imho. There's one guy on the board, willpower, who does it. you might want to talk to him.
01-09-2004, 12:22 AM #12
even with fast acting esters (prop,susp,winny etc.)
You really don't start feeling the effects till the 2nd week anyway...atleast I don't.
I don't see any sense in a 2 weeker.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)