Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361

    Has anyone else ever used...

    Has anyone else ever used this formula to map mgs/wk?


    Lean body weight (lbs) / 2.2 = daily mgs or x by 7 and get weekly mgs???

    I ran this for at least the first 5-7years and made GREAT gains every time.
    (It is just mg/kg lean body weight/ day)

    I only post this because I see all of these bro's running wicked high doses out of the gate... they could grow on 1/2 the amount don't you think?

    (as long as training and food is addressed...)

  2. #2
    JohnnyB's Avatar
    JohnnyB is offline AR-Hall of Famer / Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Califas
    Posts
    9,265
    Never heard of it

    JohnnyB

  3. #3
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    ...it may be before your BB supplementation started.

    Thanks for the reply anyway.

  4. #4
    nevaenuf's Avatar
    nevaenuf is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,460
    Alot of people do start out a little high. Who told you about this method?

  5. #5
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by nevaenuf
    Alot of people do start out a little high. Who told you about this method?
    Its was something I spoke with Dr. Fred Hatfield about 15 years ago when I was in college. That is was a rule of thumb back then for mgs/wk... There is a breakdown of % of high androgen based items and high anabolic items...I used it forever and turned my bro's onto it 10-12 years back. I thought it was this formula because I always grew and got stronger on 1/2 of the sh*t everyone esle was taking. I switch them to dosing them for their lean body weight and they would see more out of their gear... who the hell knows??? anyway... if you have some spare time/gear try it...

    ex: my lean body weight is 210lbs / by 2.2 = 95.45 x 7 = 668 which is 688mg/wk... round up to 700mg/wk.. sounds stupid low for this board but.... it worked.
    Now as you do more cycles there is a % factor to use.
    (receptor site down regulation)
    cycling1-5years x by (1-1.2)
    cycling 5-10years x by (1.2-1.5)
    cycling 10-15years x by (1.5-2.?????)

    I multiply by 1.5 and get around 1000mg/wk... aand it works everytime
    I have been 1-2 cycle / year for 15 years and I NEVER go much above 1000mg / wk... I have tried it and I see nothing but increased side effects...


    kinda interesting...

  6. #6
    DF2003's Avatar
    DF2003 is offline Banned Boofus
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,699

    nope

    nope never heard of it. hey is that gregg v in your avatar?

  7. #7
    TRE's Avatar
    TRE
    TRE is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    OC
    Posts
    2,523
    I'm at about 240 now so 240/2.2 is 109. 763 a week huh. I really over shot my bounds then with the 2400mg a week for my first 4 weeks. I was only at about 215 when I started to so that makes it even worse.

  8. #8
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by DF2003
    nope never heard of it. hey is that gregg v in your avatar?
    ...yea that is greg v.... how much pump-n-pose do you think is in each bicep?

  9. #9
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by TRE
    I'm at about 240 now so 240/2.2 is 109. 763 a week huh. I really over shot my bounds then with the 2400mg a week for my first 4 weeks. I was only at about 215 when I started to so that makes it even worse.
    2400mg/wk!!!!!!!!!!!!! holy sh*t I started at 165 and made it to 245 (over 10 years)before even going to 750mg/wk..... and stayed between 750 and 1000mg/wk up to 280lbs.... I'm just thinking of what could happen at 2400mg/wk....

    interesting...

  10. #10
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by SGFuryZ
    LMAO!!! That says I should be running 779mg/wk! At over 2100mg's (my current avg. cycle dosage), you could say I'm an over-acheiver...

    tre @ 2400 you @ 2100 /wk ...I may just have to give it a shot (no pun) and see what happens...

  11. #11
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by whiteykauai
    i think he has fake boobs in each arm
    he just may have...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •