Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. 02-13-2004, 06:21 PM #1
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton
    Ben Lifton is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361

    Has anyone else ever used...

    Has anyone else ever used this formula to map mgs/wk?


    Lean body weight (lbs) / 2.2 = daily mgs or x by 7 and get weekly mgs???

    I ran this for at least the first 5-7years and made GREAT gains every time.
    (It is just mg/kg lean body weight/ day)

    I only post this because I see all of these bro's running wicked high doses out of the gate... they could grow on 1/2 the amount don't you think?

    (as long as training and food is addressed...)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 02-13-2004, 06:56 PM #2
    JohnnyB's Avatar
    JohnnyB
    JohnnyB is offline AR-Hall of Famer / Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Califas
    Posts
    9,138
    Never heard of it

    JohnnyB
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 02-13-2004, 07:35 PM #3
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton
    Ben Lifton is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    ...it may be before your BB supplementation started.

    Thanks for the reply anyway.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 02-13-2004, 08:08 PM #4
    nevaenuf's Avatar
    nevaenuf
    nevaenuf is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,458
    Alot of people do start out a little high. Who told you about this method?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 02-14-2004, 11:12 AM #5
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton
    Ben Lifton is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by nevaenuf
    Alot of people do start out a little high. Who told you about this method?
    Its was something I spoke with Dr. Fred Hatfield about 15 years ago when I was in college. That is was a rule of thumb back then for mgs/wk... There is a breakdown of % of high androgen based items and high anabolic items...I used it forever and turned my bro's onto it 10-12 years back. I thought it was this formula because I always grew and got stronger on 1/2 of the sh*t everyone esle was taking. I switch them to dosing them for their lean body weight and they would see more out of their gear... who the hell knows??? anyway... if you have some spare time/gear try it...

    ex: my lean body weight is 210lbs / by 2.2 = 95.45 x 7 = 668 which is 688mg/wk... round up to 700mg/wk.. sounds stupid low for this board but.... it worked.
    Now as you do more cycles there is a % factor to use.
    (receptor site down regulation)
    cycling1-5years x by (1-1.2)
    cycling 5-10years x by (1.2-1.5)
    cycling 10-15years x by (1.5-2.?????)

    I multiply by 1.5 and get around 1000mg/wk... aand it works everytime
    I have been 1-2 cycle / year for 15 years and I NEVER go much above 1000mg / wk... I have tried it and I see nothing but increased side effects...


    kinda interesting...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 02-14-2004, 02:53 PM #6
    DF2003's Avatar
    DF2003
    DF2003 is offline Banned Boofus
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,657

    nope

    nope never heard of it. hey is that gregg v in your avatar?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 02-14-2004, 02:58 PM #7
    TRE's Avatar
    TRE
    TRE is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    OC
    Posts
    2,523
    I'm at about 240 now so 240/2.2 is 109. 763 a week huh. I really over shot my bounds then with the 2400mg a week for my first 4 weeks. I was only at about 215 when I started to so that makes it even worse.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 02-14-2004, 05:42 PM #8
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton
    Ben Lifton is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by DF2003
    nope never heard of it. hey is that gregg v in your avatar?
    ...yea that is greg v.... how much pump-n-pose do you think is in each bicep?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 02-14-2004, 05:47 PM #9
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton
    Ben Lifton is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by TRE
    I'm at about 240 now so 240/2.2 is 109. 763 a week huh. I really over shot my bounds then with the 2400mg a week for my first 4 weeks. I was only at about 215 when I started to so that makes it even worse.
    2400mg/wk!!!!!!!!!!!!! holy sh*t I started at 165 and made it to 245 (over 10 years)before even going to 750mg/wk..... and stayed between 750 and 1000mg/wk up to 280lbs.... I'm just thinking of what could happen at 2400mg/wk....

    interesting...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 02-14-2004, 05:49 PM #10
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton
    Ben Lifton is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by SGFuryZ
    LMAO!!! That says I should be running 779mg/wk! At over 2100mg's (my current avg. cycle dosage), you could say I'm an over-acheiver...

    tre @ 2400 you @ 2100 /wk ...I may just have to give it a shot (no pun) and see what happens...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 02-14-2004, 06:39 PM #11
    Ben Lifton's Avatar
    Ben Lifton
    Ben Lifton is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by whiteykauai
    i think he has fake boobs in each arm
    he just may have...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules