Human Grade vs. Vet Grade?

**ricktsa** · 02-20-2004, 04:23 PM

Whatup bros...Im considering trying the tornel supertest 250 for the first time. I ve recieved mized reviews, and I'm deciding to go with it. My question is, what is the main difference betwen gear deemed "human grade" and that which isnt? Are there more risks with either? Thanks bros? -R

**IGOTJUICE007** · 02-20-2004, 04:28 PM

usually with human grade, dosing is more accurate, and the oil is "cleaner", in other words batches are more consistent, and most are made in licensed facilities....this is not to say this is true about all vets, but thats a general rule of thumb....I usually only use human grade test....ICNs being my favorite....your gonna hear opinions going both ways....but most will say vet is the best bang for your buck and is usually more readily available.

**PurePower** · 02-20-2004, 04:33 PM

I have used "vet" gear many times and never had a problem.......The only problem is that the BA content could be a little higher wich will cause a little more pain but nothing to worry about.

**spywizard** · 02-20-2004, 04:37 PM

human............ makes me feel like an animal................

**powerlifter** · 02-20-2004, 04:42 PM

Vet is usually easier to get

**TRE** · 02-20-2004, 04:42 PM

Most vet gear is human grade just not licensed due to inconsistency. The tornell supertest for instance is underdosed to 190mg/ml instaid of 250mg/ml.

**ricktsa** · 02-20-2004, 05:00 PM

Originally Posted by TRE

Most vet gear is human grade just not licensed due to inconsistency. The tornell supertest for instance is underdosed to 190mg/ml instaid of 250mg/ml.

Is this a consistent measure of tornel, by that I mean is it known to always be that significantly underdosed? The extra cost of something known to be more accurately dosed would be justified if this is the case.