Thread: HGH vs IGF-1 LR3
03-07-2005, 01:52 AM #1
HGH vs IGF-1 LR3
HGH VS IGF-1 LR3
Which is better and why. What are the differences between the two that make them different.
03-07-2005, 08:14 AM #2
What goal are you looking for?
03-07-2005, 06:04 PM #3Originally Posted by JohnnyB
03-07-2005, 06:31 PM #4
03-07-2005, 06:35 PM #5Originally Posted by Mr. Sparkle
03-07-2005, 06:37 PM #6Originally Posted by JohnnyB
03-07-2005, 07:15 PM #7
bump... interested too.
03-07-2005, 07:57 PM #8Originally Posted by WannabePro
03-09-2005, 06:18 PM #9
Now - I am very interested in the two as well. I'd be interested to know cost differences, etc. Can you use either more effectively on their own. I have been researching a lot on GH and have found that with Slin its effectively is improved 10 fold.
What about IGF-1 on its own? How much and how long would I need to use IGF-1 and which has had more research long and short term done about it?
I appologise if I am hijack the post but I believe essentially I am after the same thing except I am looking to improve my track running performance; 400 - 800 m so strength would be my goal.
Would IGF-1 be the best if looking for SIZE, BULK, ETC
and GH for extra muscle cells etc.
Let me know if I am completely off the track. I'm confused after reading thousands of posts.
03-09-2005, 07:56 PM #10
Bump... I'd like to know the above too...
03-09-2005, 08:12 PM #11New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
I would go with Lr3 over Gh, simply because of the amout of time you have to use GH for. I have used both of them myself and the muscle gains were much better in 30 days with Lr3 as to 6 months of GH.
03-13-2005, 07:48 AM #12
How much Lr3 did you take Dilanger?
Did Lr3 still increase the number of muscle fibers? - which in my book is why you'd take GH or LR3 over AAS because once you reach your genetic potential extra muscle fibers can actually raise the bar of your potential so to speak!
03-13-2005, 10:26 AM #13
so for pure lean muscle gain..say 5-10 lb ..lr3 is better?
what if u wanted to get the hard physique look..for the summer
obv...diet and cardio would come in to play..
will lr3 aid in bodyfat loss?
03-13-2005, 12:04 PM #14
I think if you want the full affect of the new muscle fibers developed by igf-1 you need some type of AS. Since roids don't make new fibers but enlarges the ones you already have.
03-13-2005, 06:41 PM #15New Member
Originally Posted by LL08
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
I used 50mcgs per day for 35 days starting week 5. During my enanthate ,EQ and GH cycle and the results I got were great when adding in Lr3. As far a muscle cell, its hard to tell if I got new muscle fibers from the Lr3 because I have been on GH for some time now. If you are compareing the two as far as new muscle cell I would have go with long term GH use.
03-13-2005, 08:02 PM #16Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
IGF-1 is the growth factor that causes muscle hyperplasia. GH builds muscle indirectly, by releasing IGF-1 when GH is destroyed by the liver. Using IGF-1 is just a shortcut straight to the muscle building component of GH.
GH is a more potent fat burner. IGF-1 is a more potent muscle builder. This is not speculation. Do a search for some more info on IGF-1. I know Mr. Sparkle is working on a comprehensive IGF-1 FAQ - so watch for that.
03-13-2005, 08:30 PM #17Originally Posted by Whitey
03-13-2005, 08:47 PM #18
OK, so what about 4 - 7 weeks on IGF-1 Vs 6 months HGH in terms of muscle hyperplasia?
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)