Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    felthamboy's Avatar
    felthamboy is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    london (uk)
    Posts
    80

    igf-1 LR3 or hgh for mass

    hi guy witch do you think is best igf 4 weeks on 4 weeks off for 6 mounths or hgh at 4 iu for 6 mounths

    many thanks
    simon

  2. #2
    mixxin is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    101
    Igf-1 Lr3

  3. #3
    Ironman5151 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by mixxin
    Igf-1 Lr3
    I dont know from experience, but from what I read.. I agree with igf. I got some on the way myself

  4. #4
    mixxin is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    101
    GH is better for overall benefits. IGF-1 is good for muscle, tissue, bone, and nerve repair. If I had to choose one, I would go with GH as I am in my early 30s.

  5. #5
    kingof516's Avatar
    kingof516 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    En El Ciudad
    Posts
    265
    i did gh alone first for 6 months, and now igf...i like gh better you pay more, but its better IMO

  6. #6
    JohnnyB's Avatar
    JohnnyB is offline AR-Hall of Famer / Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Califas
    Posts
    9,265
    LR3, I'm almost 50 so it's better for me

    JohnnyB

  7. #7
    Nicky B's Avatar
    Nicky B is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    your fridge
    Posts
    1,617
    It doesn't really matter which one you choose you will not be dissappointed with either choice.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    tampa,fl
    Posts
    963
    Just keep in mind that results seen from gh are long term...this is not the case with igf.

  9. #9
    felthamboy's Avatar
    felthamboy is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    london (uk)
    Posts
    80
    why do you say it is not the case with igf most of the growth you get from gh is from igf

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    tampa,fl
    Posts
    963
    You are right...but, you get much less igf from 4 iu of gh than, say a normal dosage of igf (40mcg).

  11. #11
    felthamboy's Avatar
    felthamboy is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    london (uk)
    Posts
    80
    is this not a good thing more igf means more new cells and keepable gains or am i wrong im still learning about this

  12. #12
    CSnoddon's Avatar
    CSnoddon is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    belfast
    Posts
    56
    Done both dude gh for 9 mths and a couple of courses of lr3 and i have to say id go lr3 everytime.Gh was bein shot at 5iu daily and igf for 4wks 40mcg and both ran with aas.The igf gave me the best gains over the short term period so i stick with it now just adding some slin to boost nutrient uptake.Bearing in mind igf is sold as a research chemical some companies wont endorse its use as with gh, but no probs for me so far.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    tampa,fl
    Posts
    963
    Quote Originally Posted by felthamboy
    is this not a good thing more igf means more new cells and keepable gains or am i wrong im still learning about this
    Yes, it is a good thing. I just started igf(40 mcg pwo) and gh(5 iu ed), but if I could only have one I would go with the igf....just like most everyone will tell you. I cant say this from experience, as I have just started igf/gh but look at the responses and you will see from people who have done both in the past.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •