I've heard many conflicting opinions on whether IGF-LR3 causes site growth. This poll is for REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE. Not some crappy log of some scientist saying it is or isn't site specific.
Printable View
I've heard many conflicting opinions on whether IGF-LR3 causes site growth. This poll is for REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE. Not some crappy log of some scientist saying it is or isn't site specific.
NOOOOO igf-1 LR3 has shown not to produce site growth. Because its half-life is simply to long its over 10hours. Although I believe rIgf-1 can produce site growth because of its very short half-life of only around 30minutes.
any other opinions?
i agree with nicky B and allthough i have never noticed any site growth the peak on my biceps seem to get a litle higher.i always shoot biceps,one day left other day right,because i find this the easyest and cause thats were the skin/fat is the thinnest so i can shoot further in the muscle with the slinpin.
-rodge
PGF2A causes site growth
if LR3 doesn't cause site growth then why the hell does everyone shoot it PWO? that just doesn't make sense to me
cause of upregulated igf receptors.
-rodge
I can say for me the site did feel more pumped for about 24 hours but went back down to normal. I didn't see any permanent growth on the site injections. But the stuff does work great all around. I love the stuff.
like rodge said, the peaks in my biceps have just blown up... lovin it, we'll see if it goes away
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbouncinballs
do you get bumps when shooting IGF? i get them every time i shoot them in my bicep and it takes 2 days for it to go away.
never noticed,what kind of igf/dilutent are you using?Quote:
Originally Posted by itsjinx
-rodge
yeah, no bumps ever????
using O***A with BW dilutant i believe. i get one "lump" whenever I shoot about the size of a dime right in the musclev and it goes down after a couple days. im shooting 6IU of the IGF and then 20IU of BW