Thread: IM or SubQ?
08-01-2005, 08:26 AM #1
IM or SubQ?
Any difference in injecting GH IM as opposed to SubQ?
08-01-2005, 09:05 AM #2
I did 100ius im and noticed that the subq actually felt like it was working better. A lot of people say that gh can be used site specific, and I agree. I still say keep it subq.
When I ran the kit IM it has less sides, in terms of aches and water retention, but I dd notice any great gains, or pumps.
08-01-2005, 09:13 AM #3Originally Posted by kingof516
And more IGF-1 also means more water retention. Maybe the fact that you got less water retention and less pumps etc etc. Is becuse the IM shots were not as effective as the subQ shots???
08-01-2005, 04:51 PM #4Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
I believe they work the same. It is only the speed of absorption (muscle is faster) that differs.
08-02-2005, 03:38 AM #5supersteve GuestOriginally Posted by Carth
08-02-2005, 05:19 AM #6Originally Posted by supersteve
08-02-2005, 05:46 AM #7Originally Posted by Carth
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)