Printable View
Considering that i'm in my early twenties, i have a feeling that i am way too young...
But generally speaking, what age is it worth taking advantage of these compounds? i heard late 20s for GH, as when you are younger your body still produces a fair amount of it
Quote:
Originally Posted by ward065
I've read/heard the same. Late 20's pushing early 30's. But look at me, 25 and running it for the 2nd time, I've always been so hardheaded.
Taking many peoples advice running IGF-1LR3. Starting that anyday now. Ahhhhhhhhhh
HGH 30's, 35 is better
LR3 IGF-1 is up in the air, no real proof either way
JohnnyB
i've read a lot of good things about igf-1LR3 but the price is just enormous! so i guess it boils down to, could you get better or equal results just off a traditional cycle, with less money...?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhova16
plus considering not any real studies have been done (correct me if i am wrong....) i think johnnyb said in an earlier thread it can stimulate cancer and stuff.....sounds like scary stuff.
Consider that when juice was first used, the same knowledge was not there as the knowledge we have today. At least a few bodybuilders had liver problems/ tumors later in life, probably from high usage of orals.
The price of gh is more then igf-1 considering you need atleast 4kits to run an effective cycle. You are looking at 450 for 1mg of igf-1 then you are getting ripped off. Now about the if you already have cancer or its in the family igf-1 can excelerate its growth I beleive.Quote:
Originally Posted by ward065
Couldn't agree more.Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyB
You shouldn't be paying any more than $200/ml for l3. $150 if you look around.
I would say at least 30, i started at 35.