Printable View
If you can afford to cycle only one or the other, which one by itself will produce better results as part of a bulking cycle? Does it depend on the steroids you stack with it? Are some steroids better suited towards stacking with HGH, others better suited towards IGF-1? And will stacking HGH and IGF-1 together always produce better results than using either of the compounds by themselves (and with steroids, of course)?
In Bold........
[QUOTE=SensP]If you can afford to cycle only one or the other, which one by itself will produce better results as part of a bulking cycle?IGF Does it depend on the steroids you stack with it?NO Are some steroids better suited towards stacking with HGH, others better suited towards IGF-1?NO And will stacking HGH and IGF-1 together always produce better results than using either of the compounds by themselves (and with steroids, of course)?NOT always...but it sure doesn't hurt bro!!!![/QUOTE]
~Pinnacle~
Thanks, Pinn. So why is GH so much more expensive than IGF? Just more difficult to manufacture?
I definitely think GH and igf-1 are best used together. But if you can only afford one go for igf-1. Although remember, you're only going to be using igf-1 every 2nd month, whereas with GH you're using it continually, so the benefits will be constant (which is also why it's more expensive).
if you can only afford one, then go with lr3 igf-1. cycle it 4 weeks on/4 weeks off with slin in the off weeks.
and i agree that hgh and lr3 stack vey well together.
-rodge
agreed, i myself am an avid igf-1 user. HGH is good, but its alot of money and at my age, i probably am not gettin the full effects. So igf-1 and slin is best, especially when bulkin.Quote:
Originally Posted by rodge nl.
alo
I think GH is great with 750-1000mg of test, low dose of T-3 maybe 12.5-25mcg and slin on training days, but for the money i would go with IGF-1r...XXL
thats weird - my guy charges the same for igf as he does for HGH - both way too much