Printable View
I been looking into growth for a while now. From the research I found it says that growth should be started at about 30 years +. I am only 25 but want to try growth for 6 months at 4 iu's a day mixed with some test, deca, d bol, in the middle, with winsrol and prop at the end. Any suggestions?
Thanks
Would certainly help. But you might not get the benefits from that dose that someone over 30 would. But then again you might.
IGF-1 may be more cost effective for you and would probably yield better results in terms of mass, so i'd suggest that.
I think you'd be disappointed, I've used HGH and it's nothing to write home about and I'm over 30
JohnnyB
I agree with supersteve. I have used both at 22 4iu GH for 7 months and I used LR3 at 60mcgs. The GH was defenitly not cost effective but the LR3 was worth every penny.
My source only carries HGH straight from the gen sci factory. I emailed him about the LR3 but I am not sure if a different company makes that or not.
HGH is good stuff and I will be posting a technical paper I wrote on it in a couple days here. Dont expect much muscle gain from it tho, and it needs to be run 6 months--even medical research papers state this. LR3 IGF-I is more cost effective and can be purchased as a research chem on the web.Quote:
Originally Posted by msu16366
THanks for the information guys,
I was all hyped up to try HGH but maybe now is not the time. I am 25 years old and there are many anabolics I have not tried yet.
However the lr3 Igf-1 might work better for me at this time. How many kits of Igtropin would I need for a cycle. I think one kit has 1 mg in it, also from my guy its the same price as HGH<
I thought lr igf-1 was cheaper than HGH, or is it just because you dont need as many kits to run it.
ALso if anyone wants to talk me back into HGH I would love to hear about it.
THanks