10-31-2005, 07:51 PM #1
Is there any benefit to running HGH at 25 years of age.
I been looking into growth for a while now. From the research I found it says that growth should be started at about 30 years +. I am only 25 but want to try growth for 6 months at 4 iu's a day mixed with some test, deca , d bol, in the middle, with winsrol and prop at the end. Any suggestions?
10-31-2005, 09:08 PM #2supersteve Guest
Would certainly help. But you might not get the benefits from that dose that someone over 30 would. But then again you might.
IGF-1 may be more cost effective for you and would probably yield better results in terms of mass, so i'd suggest that.
11-01-2005, 09:25 AM #3
I think you'd be disappointed, I've used HGH and it's nothing to write home about and I'm over 30
11-01-2005, 07:38 PM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
I agree with supersteve. I have used both at 22 4iu GH for 7 months and I used LR3 at 60mcgs. The GH was defenitly not cost effective but the LR3 was worth every penny.
11-01-2005, 07:39 PM #5
My source only carries HGH straight from the gen sci factory. I emailed him about the LR3 but I am not sure if a different company makes that or not.
11-01-2005, 10:03 PM #6Originally Posted by msu16366
11-03-2005, 02:55 PM #7
THanks for the information guys,
I was all hyped up to try HGH but maybe now is not the time. I am 25 years old and there are many anabolics I have not tried yet.
However the lr3 Igf-1 might work better for me at this time. How many kits of Igtropin would I need for a cycle. I think one kit has 1 mg in it, also from my guy its the same price as HGH<
I thought lr igf-1 was cheaper than HGH, or is it just because you dont need as many kits to run it.
ALso if anyone wants to talk me back into HGH I would love to hear about it.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)