Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    msu16366's Avatar
    msu16366 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    951

    Is there any benefit to running HGH at 25 years of age.

    I been looking into growth for a while now. From the research I found it says that growth should be started at about 30 years +. I am only 25 but want to try growth for 6 months at 4 iu's a day mixed with some test, deca , d bol, in the middle, with winsrol and prop at the end. Any suggestions?
    Thanks

  2. #2
    supersteve Guest
    Would certainly help. But you might not get the benefits from that dose that someone over 30 would. But then again you might.
    IGF-1 may be more cost effective for you and would probably yield better results in terms of mass, so i'd suggest that.

  3. #3
    JohnnyB's Avatar
    JohnnyB is offline AR-Hall of Famer / Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Califas
    Posts
    9,265
    I think you'd be disappointed, I've used HGH and it's nothing to write home about and I'm over 30

    JohnnyB

  4. #4
    Dilanger is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    44
    I agree with supersteve. I have used both at 22 4iu GH for 7 months and I used LR3 at 60mcgs. The GH was defenitly not cost effective but the LR3 was worth every penny.

  5. #5
    msu16366's Avatar
    msu16366 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    951
    My source only carries HGH straight from the gen sci factory. I emailed him about the LR3 but I am not sure if a different company makes that or not.

  6. #6
    powerliftmike's Avatar
    powerliftmike is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    gates of hell
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by msu16366
    My source only carries HGH straight from the gen sci factory. I emailed him about the LR3 but I am not sure if a different company makes that or not.
    HGH is good stuff and I will be posting a technical paper I wrote on it in a couple days here. Dont expect much muscle gain from it tho, and it needs to be run 6 months--even medical research papers state this. LR3 IGF-I is more cost effective and can be purchased as a research chem on the web.

  7. #7
    msu16366's Avatar
    msu16366 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    951
    THanks for the information guys,
    I was all hyped up to try HGH but maybe now is not the time. I am 25 years old and there are many anabolics I have not tried yet.
    However the lr3 Igf-1 might work better for me at this time. How many kits of Igtropin would I need for a cycle. I think one kit has 1 mg in it, also from my guy its the same price as HGH<
    I thought lr igf-1 was cheaper than HGH, or is it just because you dont need as many kits to run it.
    ALso if anyone wants to talk me back into HGH I would love to hear about it.
    THanks

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •