Results 1 to 32 of 32
  1. #1
    ACAZORES is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    916

    Slin IM or SC injection

    I take my slin shots subcutaneous can I still make the same gains as Intermuscular shots, I have heard that intermuscular is better, is there any diference?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    378
    You can take hcg intra vaneous, intra muscular or sub cutaneous. I have only tried intra muscular but at the end of the cycle I'm on now I'm gonna try intravaneous.

    I know that subcutaneous injections are absorbed faster while intra muscular takes more time because of the fat depots. Or it could be the other way around. But I do know for fact that one is absorbed quicker than the other. Also, I'm guessing that intra-vaneous is the quickest way since it goes directly to your blood stream. But once again I'm not sure, so if you die please don't hold a grudge against me. LOL

  3. #3
    BG's Avatar
    BG
    BG is offline The Real Deal - AR-Platinum Elite- Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    23,077
    Quote Originally Posted by inspector_injector
    You can take hcg intra vaneous, intra muscular or sub cutaneous. I have only tried intra muscular but at the end of the cycle I'm on now I'm gonna try intravaneous.

    I know that subcutaneous injections are absorbed faster while intra muscular takes more time because of the fat depots. Or it could be the other way around. But I do know for fact that one is absorbed quicker than the other. Also, I'm guessing that intra-vaneous is the quickest way since it goes directly to your blood stream. But once again I'm not sure, so if you die please don't hold a grudge against me. LOL
    Why would you even post this crap at all!

  4. #4
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    Quote Originally Posted by inspector_injector
    You can take hcg intra vaneous, intra muscular or sub cutaneous. I have only tried intra muscular but at the end of the cycle I'm on now I'm gonna try intravaneous.

    I know that subcutaneous injections are absorbed faster while intra muscular takes more time because of the fat depots. Or it could be the other way around. But I do know for fact that one is absorbed quicker than the other. Also, I'm guessing that intra-vaneous is the quickest way since it goes directly to your blood stream. But once again I'm not sure, so if you die please don't hold a grudge against me. LOL
    This might possible be the dumbest post I've read.

    Do NOT inject intra-vaneous! Intra muscular is the quickest absorbed, from what I understand it will cut the halflife in half. Some people also claim you can spot inject for lagging muscle groups. I'm in the process of experimenting.

  5. #5
    SPIKE's Avatar
    SPIKE is offline AR-Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glutes & Quads
    Posts
    9,519
    Dude I"m not even going to comment on this one

  6. #6
    topvega's Avatar
    topvega is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Back from the dead.....
    Posts
    3,254
    yeah u shoot im to cut the halflife down, thus making it safer to use. less time having to watch for signs of going hypo...

  7. #7
    Pinnacle's Avatar
    Pinnacle is offline AR-Hall of Famer ~ Cocky motherF*cker!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,540
    Quote Originally Posted by IBdmfkr
    This might possible be the dumbest post I've read.
    No...I've read quite a few of his other posts.I'm deciding which one is more idiotic than the other.Total tool!!!

    He's actually very dangerous in the steroid forum...extremely dangerous advice given!


    ~Pinnacle~

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    378
    All I said was HCG , not oil or other drugs. HCG can be injected intra-vaneous.

    Pinn, why all the beef bro? I never said shit towards you? If I'm 160 lbs. and wanna take roids it's my f*king choice. I think you're a little less condident than most on this board, I see your post's too and all you do is talk sh*t towards others. Obviously you have issues.

    I give dangerous advice? Show me one or two posts that I have writen that is so called "dangerous." I'll be waiting till I die for your post. (Unless you make a fake one, lol.)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    378
    I appologize if you gentlemen thought I meant slin, I said HCG and I realize that his question was for slin. So once again I appologize. But you can take hcg intra vaneous.

  10. #10
    Pinnacle's Avatar
    Pinnacle is offline AR-Hall of Famer ~ Cocky motherF*cker!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,540
    Quote Originally Posted by inspector_injector

    I give dangerous advice? Show me one or two posts that I have writen that is so called "dangerous." I'll be waiting till I die for your post. (Unless you make a fake one, lol.)
    Dangerous and POOR adivice fall in the same category.Here's one example.I'm still looking for the posts you made telling guys to shoot Prop every three days.

    Quote Originally Posted by inspector_injector
    Well If this is your first cycle then cut the sust to only 250mg every five days..
    Now that's sound advice...sust every 5 days?


    ~Pinnacle~

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    378
    First of all, I didn't tell anyone to shoot prop every three days, I asked if it was okay for me to shot prop every three days. Now that I have learned from other bro's that are willing to take their time to explain things that they know, just as I do, I will only inject it every day or every other day.

    How is taking 250mg of sust every five days dangerous? The only difference is that you are not taking advantage of the propionate ester?

    Dangerous and poor advice don't fall in the same category. Dangerous means: injury or fatal, while poor means: not maximizing full benefits of a steroid or drug

    Anything else you wanna downgrade me for?

  12. #12
    Pinnacle's Avatar
    Pinnacle is offline AR-Hall of Famer ~ Cocky motherF*cker!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yes,those are my legs
    Posts
    4,540
    Quote Originally Posted by inspector_injector
    First of all, I didn't tell anyone to shoot prop every three days,
    Oh really?

    Quote Originally Posted by inspector_injector
    . . Take 25-50mg of prop every three days, no need to split it up. Feel free to ask more ?'s

    ~Pinnacle~

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    378
    Yeah okay!!! First of all, I have not seen that thread so who knows what it was being referenced to. Regardless, how is that fatal or harmful. I think your little dumb recommendations of 1 gram of test a week is alot more harmful than taking less. Why am I even wasting my time with you. What goes around comes around, that's why you got hit by the hurricane. Don't even talk anymore sh*t till you post pics because you're probably fat and think that being a walking water tower is better than being shredded.

  14. #14
    rodge's Avatar
    rodge is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    holland.
    Posts
    2,849
    come on guys keep it decent here, don't let this get into a pissing contest.

    -rodge

  15. #15
    topvega's Avatar
    topvega is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Back from the dead.....
    Posts
    3,254
    Quote Originally Posted by inspector_injector
    Yeah okay!!! First of all, I have not seen that thread so who knows what it was being referenced to. Regardless, how is that fatal or harmful. I think your little dumb recommendations of 1 gram of test a week is alot more harmful than taking less. Why am I even wasting my time with you. What goes around comes around, that's why you got hit by the hurricane. Don't even talk anymore sh*t till you post pics because you're probably fat and think that being a walking water tower is better than being shredded.
    The hurricane comment is below the belt. People lost everything they had.
    I have gotten nothing but good advice from Pinn. He has never recomended that I run 1 gram of test a week. He has given valid reasons why it might become necessary to run upwards of 1 gram at some point in your future cycles though...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    378
    Okay, you are right about the hurrican deal, but this guy has given me sh*t since day one on here. WTF does it matter when I start juicing weight-wise? I'm 21 going on to 22 and I'm fine. I don't plan on being bigger than 215-225. I already gained like 20lbs. naturally. And it's very hard for me to gain weight past that, my diet and everything else is in sound check. Regardless, I'm not even going to start a flame war with Pinn cuz I can see plenty of other members who feel the same way about him.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    378
    Quote Originally Posted by rodge nl.
    come on guys keep it decent here, don't let this get into a pissing contest.

    -rodge
    BTW, you're one pretty big mother f*cker. You look like your tall too. You must be 250-260lbs. ripped? I'm not , I just wanted to tell you that ever since I saw your avatar.

  18. #18
    topvega's Avatar
    topvega is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Back from the dead.....
    Posts
    3,254
    not trying to add fuel to the fire, but I thought u were 25? Your profile says born 1980...

  19. #19
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    This thread just keeps getting better!

  20. #20
    rodge's Avatar
    rodge is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    holland.
    Posts
    2,849
    let's stop this bullsh!tting and go back to the original thread.

    -rodge

  21. #21
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    It's been answered, correct? Unless he wants studies.

  22. #22
    Warrior's Avatar
    Warrior is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    6'0"/248lbs
    Posts
    6,982
    Quote Originally Posted by inspector_injector
    You can take hcg intra vaneous, intra muscular or sub cutaneous. I have only tried intra muscular but at the end of the cycle I'm on now I'm gonna try intravaneous.

    I know that subcutaneous injections are absorbed faster while intra muscular takes more time because of the fat depots. Or it could be the other way around. But I do know for fact that one is absorbed quicker than the other. Also, I'm guessing that intra-vaneous is the quickest way since it goes directly to your blood stream. But once again I'm not sure, so if you die please don't hold a grudge against me. LOL
    Yeah - I prefer to have my IV drip set to 1:1 Fina/Prop...

    This is one for that funny AR quotes thread - someone find it! I'm going to bed...

    Sorry dude... for some reason I just can't stop laughing...

  23. #23
    rodge's Avatar
    rodge is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    holland.
    Posts
    2,849
    Quote Originally Posted by ACAZORES
    I take my slin shots subcutaneous can I still make the same gains as Intermuscular shots, I have heard that intermuscular is better, is there any diference?
    sure you would make gains when shooting slin subq but when shooting it IM we cut the duration time in half. this way we don't have to watch our fat intake longer then necesery(and less time of risking going hypo). remember that we take slin to shutle nutrients to our muscle when they need it the most ie pwo. by shooting an short acting slin IM we acomplisch this as fast as possible. and since we shoot slin with a slinpin you won't feel a thing of it even when shot IM.

    -rodge

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    America
    Posts
    378
    No, I'm 22 soon.

  25. #25
    Gear's Avatar
    Gear is offline HGH/IGF/Insulin Forum ~ AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    7,795
    When it comes to fast absorption, IV is the best way to go about it. However, some compounds just shouldn't be taken IV even i it works better, and this is simply because of the side effects risks. One of these compounds that shouldn't be taken IV is insulin . Insulin should only be taken IM or Sub-Q. Even though IM works faster and has a higher absorbency rate, you still may not be able to tell the difference (results wise) when comparing IM and Sub-Q.

    -Gear

  26. #26
    fishorcutbait is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by inspector_injector
    All I said was HCG, not oil or other drugs. HCG can be injected intra-vaneous.
    You insinuated that you could shoot slin the same way. THAT WOULD MESS YOU UP. Someone should you

  27. #27
    Big Bapper's Avatar
    Big Bapper is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    THE SHIT ABYSS !!
    Posts
    546
    Quote Originally Posted by rodge nl.
    sure you would make gains when shooting slin subq but when shooting it IM we cut the duration time in half. this way we don't have to watch our fat intake longer then necesery(and less time of risking going hypo). remember that we take slin to shutle nutrients to our muscle when they need it the most ie pwo. by shooting an short acting slin IM we acomplisch this as fast as possible. and since we shoot slin with a slinpin you won't feel a thing of it even when shot IM.

    -rodge
    Thats your answer could not be clearer. Thanks for clearing everything up rodge, but holy F**K this tread would be funny if it were not so dangerous.

  28. #28
    oswaldosalcedo's Avatar
    oswaldosalcedo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,109
    Quote Originally Posted by inspector injector
    You can take hcg intra vaneous, intra muscular or sub cutaneous. I have only tried intra muscular but at the end of the cycle I'm on now I'm gonna try intravaneous.

    I know that subcutaneous injections are absorbed faster while intra muscular takes more time because of the fat depots. Or it could be the other way around. But I do know for fact that one is absorbed quicker than the other. Also, I'm guessing that intra-vaneous is the quickest way since it goes directly to your blood stream. But once again I'm not sure, so if you die please don't hold a grudge against me. LOL




    Quote Originally Posted by BigGuns101
    Why would you even post this crap at all!

    ...............ROFLMAO......................

    he is an expert !
    Last edited by oswaldosalcedo; 11-26-2005 at 02:09 PM.

  29. #29
    paulastone's Avatar
    paulastone is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    ottawa, canadian monkey
    Posts
    573
    [QUOTE=RedBaron]With respect to insulin , I think everything has already been said. SubQ and IM are going to equate to similar results ... but the nod goes toward IM for two reasons. It hits much faster and harder (thus getting the nutrients into the muscles we have worked quicker and in more abundance), and it clears out faster (so we can resume eating a normal diet without looking like the Michelin man).

    Just wondering if you had something to back this up?? some people say that Sub has a 63% absorbtion and IM of 53% and then some say IM hits you faster!
    Now witch is the safess. some say IM is unpredictable when slin reaches peaks
    Help anyone!!!

  30. #30
    paulastone's Avatar
    paulastone is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    ottawa, canadian monkey
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBaron
    Sure ... I've got some charts plotting out the difference in IM vs. subQ from a while back somewhere in my files. I will dig them up and post them. I believe there are a few already floating around here in ancient posts. I know Einstein1905 and a couple of others experimented on themselves and posted some data a year or two back and posted it here. You can probably do a search and dig up enough data to demonstrate the differences in effect. At any rate, when I get a couple of minutes, I will dig up those graphs and post them for you.

    As long as you follow the protocol you read about here and other places post insulin injection, IM is far from unpredictable or dangerous ... You do have to be ready though. It will hit within a matter of minutes, so if you are lazy or lax in your timing and amounts of carbs you will certainly have problems ... but that would be the case with subQ as well.
    thx buddy. get back to me on those charts i would realy appreciat this!

  31. #31
    paulastone's Avatar
    paulastone is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    ottawa, canadian monkey
    Posts
    573
    Bump

  32. #32
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    I like to see them as well. bump.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •