Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    TexN343's Avatar
    TexN343 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    168

    Breast Augmentation w/ IGF-1 LR3

    I read somewhere on another board where a guy said his girl injected IGF-1 LR3 into her breast and was getting larger breast while loosing fat. Is there any truth to this statement or is it some placebo effect he was seeing . The dosage was 10mcgED. I'm guessing she alternated breast daily or half dose the shot into 2shots, one for each breast.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    10,925
    Nice avatar Bro. It's BS. Breast tissue is 90% fat.

  3. #3
    TexN343's Avatar
    TexN343 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    168
    Just posting the guys argument when someone said the same as you....It's not just adipose tissue, otherwise we could get rid of gyno by going on a cut. There's also glandular formation as well, that's probly what's growing with your friend..... Could there be any truth to this statement. Would that mean you would have to inject in this tissue directly? If so that would be a long needle for someone with already decent size breast. Oh well there goes that idea.

  4. #4
    Kale is offline ~ Vet~ I like Thai Girls
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    12,114
    Tell her to just go and get fake tits. My GF in my Avi can help :-)

  5. #5
    SPIKE's Avatar
    SPIKE is offline AR-Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glutes & Quads
    Posts
    9,519
    Quote Originally Posted by TexN343
    I read somewhere on another board where a guy said his girl injected IGF-1 LR3 into her breast and was getting larger breast while loosing fat.


    That's what I think of that statement. Makes no sense what so ever to me.

  6. #6
    Seattle Junk's Avatar
    Seattle Junk is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sea-town (upper left USA)
    Posts
    3,004
    Let's see pics.

  7. #7
    ss01 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    204
    Actually, the natural growth process of mammary gland is dependent on some estrogen and IGF-1 levels. For example, someone doing nothing but IGF-1 for PCT might theoretically be giving themselves gyno.

    This very experiment has been done by a close friend and results were small but visible and permanent. Firmness increasing more than size, that is also good. Experiment was carried out with just IGF-1 supplementation. Estrogen supplementation also would certainly provide better results.

    One caveat: Estrogen and IGF-1 will sound like a recipe for breast cancer to some. Just make sure your test subject is low-risk for cancer. Not that I'm saying there is a way to know you're not going to get cancer...

    EDIT: Had not seen RedBaron's post prior to writing this.

  8. #8
    stumbras is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    62
    yep be careful with igf-1 after cycle, it might give gyno

  9. #9
    ss01 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by stumbras
    yep be careful with igf-1 after cycle, it might give gyno
    Only if not using any SERMs, which would be downright stupid.

  10. #10
    Seattle Junk's Avatar
    Seattle Junk is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sea-town (upper left USA)
    Posts
    3,004
    Quote Originally Posted by ss01
    Only if not using any SERMs, which would be downright stupid.
    Yeah, why in the hell would you use Nolva in PCT? lmao... nolva, clomid and clen work great for me in PCT. I dunno about the IGF-1 and tits theory? But remember lr3 is not exactly igf-1, it's an altered form with a much longer half life.

  11. #11
    Seattle Junk's Avatar
    Seattle Junk is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sea-town (upper left USA)
    Posts
    3,004
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBaron
    There is absolutely NO reason for someone to be injecting LR3 directly into their breasts. Even if LR3 has an effect on receptors in the breast, it has a LONG active life and will function just fine systemically to act on all tissues in the body. Now that being said, the thing that you see in select individuals is some swelling of the breasts when on HGH or IGF when injected elsewhere. The breasts have a reasonable number of receptors, and with the right hormone balance (the presence of sufficient estrogen, etc.) HGH and/or IGF can certainly cause breast tissue to grow ... in males OR females.

    I have helps many females involved with bodybuilding and figure with HGH and IGF type cycles. For the most part, they don't experience any changes in their breasts. There have been a few however that have been very pleasantly surprised with a nice increase in fullness. Now as to whether it is just a temporary phenominon of holding fluid or a permanent enhancement, the jury is still out. While I am friends with many of these people, I certainly don't know them well enough to be examining their breasts on a regualar basis to form an educated opinion. In females, their breast size actually changes at various points in the month anyway in relation to their natural monthly cycle.

    I think the best we can say right now is that it is in the realm of possibility for a female to gain a slight bit of breast fullness by HGH or IGF. It is cetainly not enough of an enhancement that it would be an alternative to breast enhancement surgery, nor would it require direct injection into the breast. Furthermore, from what I have seen, it is only a visibly noticeable effect for a small percentage of females that I have seen using IGF and HGH. Bottom line, I wouldn't argue that a few lucky gals could probably plump up a bit, but by and large it just isn't going to be the panacea for all females wishing to enhance their breasts.
    I bet you would like to make those examinations?

  12. #12
    fred9's Avatar
    fred9 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    598
    yeah just like redbaron said, it's HGH/IGF thats the main reason of gyno, not progesteron or estrogen...ill open a new topic about this in a few minutes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •