Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Cravenmorehead is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    188

    CJC 1295 and pulsatile GH secretion.

    This study makes me think we might be overcomplicating matters with multiple peptides.

    Pulsatile Secretion of Growth Hormone (GH) Persists
    during Continuous Stimulation by CJC-1295, a LongActing GH-Releasing Hormone Analog
    Madalina Ionescu and Lawrence A. Frohman
    Section of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60608
    Context: Pulsatile GH secretion is considered important for many of
    the hormone’s physiological effects. Short-term GHRH infusions enhance GH pulsatility and increase IGF-I, but the short GHRH half-life
    limits its therapeutic use. A synthetic GHRH analog (CJC-1295) that
    binds permanently to endogenous albumin after injection (half-life 
    8 d) stimulates GH and IGF-I secretion in several animal species and
    in normal human subjects and enhances growth in rats.
    Objective: Our objective was to assess GH pulsatility after a single
    injection of CJC-1295 and determine which GH secretion parameters
    correlated to the increase in IGF-I production.
    Methods: GH pulsatility was assessed by 20-min blood sampling
    during an overnight 12-h period in healthy 20- to 40-yr-old men before
    and 1 wk after injection of either 60 or 90 g/kg CJC-1295.
    Results: GH secretion was increased after CJC-1295 administration
    with preserved pulsatility. The frequency and magnitude of GH secretory pulses were unaltered. However, basal (trough) GH levels
    were markedly increased (7.5-fold; P  0.0001) and contributed to an
    overall increase in GH secretion (mean GH levels, 46%; P  0.01) and
    IGF-I levels (45%; P  0.001). No significant differences were observed between the responses to the two drug doses. The IGF-I increases did not correlate with any parameters of GH secretion.
    Conclusions: CJC-1295 increased trough and mean GH secretion
    and IGF-I production with preserved GH pulsatility. The marked
    enhan***ent of trough GH levels by continuous GHRH stimulation
    implicates the importance of this effect on increasing IGF-I. Longacting GHRH preparations may have clinical utility in patients with
    intact pituitary GH secretory capability. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab
    91: 4792– 4797, 2006)
    Last edited by Cravenmorehead; 01-19-2012 at 04:12 PM.

  2. #2
    Cravenmorehead is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    188
    j***.endojournals.org/content/91/12/4792.full.pdf+html

  3. #3
    Swifto's Avatar
    Swifto is offline Banned- Scammer!
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    F*ck me.

    I was just reading this when you posted it!!!!

  4. #4
    Cravenmorehead is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    188
    Quote Originally Posted by Swifto View Post
    F*ck me.

    I was just reading this when you posted it!!!!
    Funny. Looks like we might be able to simplify by just using the CJC1295.......sounds like a once a week injection would do the trick. Would up GH baseline, still maintains pulsatile nature, and raises IGF........BINGO!

  5. #5
    Cravenmorehead is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    188
    ( I do get tired of having bottles of useless gear when I change my mind.....grrrrrrr)

  6. #6
    Swifto's Avatar
    Swifto is offline Banned- Scammer!
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by Cravenmorehead View Post
    Funny. Looks like we might be able to simplify by just using the CJC1295.......sounds like a once a week injection would do the trick. Would up GH baseline, still maintains pulsatile nature, and raises IGF........BINGO!
    You any good at converting the dose into mcg?

    What dose yielded this?

    From my understanding, endogenous GH levels rise steeply for 2-3hours, then decline when using peptides like CJC/GHRP.

    I will look at this study again in full tomorrow, I'm tired.

  7. #7
    DanB is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    post proelia praemia
    Posts
    9,856
    this is cjc with dac is what the study refers to if im reading it correctly which causes gh bleed and this is now thought to be what are trying to avoid and some even have studys showing it to be dangerous, dat has a chart that shows the effects of gh pulses from various peptides including cjc with dac and gh and the chart shows a barely elevated reading when using cjc w dac but 3 healthy spikes from the ghrh/ghrp combo

  8. #8
    Cravenmorehead is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    188
    Quote Originally Posted by DanB View Post
    this is cjc with dac is what the study refers to if im reading it correctly which causes gh bleed and this is now thought to be what are trying to avoid and some even have studys showing it to be dangerous, dat has a chart that shows the effects of gh pulses from various peptides including cjc with dac and gh and the chart shows a barely elevated reading when using cjc w dac but 3 healthy spikes from the ghrh/ghrp combo
    ......this study seems to contradict the gh bleed assertion since the pulses were just as vigorous as without the GHRH. Will have to do more digging. Two patients in a CJC-1295 study did suffer myocardial infarcts which ultimately doomed the marketing of the drug.

  9. #9
    DanB is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    post proelia praemia
    Posts
    9,856
    yes i remember reading that study but i also read that there could of been other factors that contributed to that, ill try dig it up, have you seen the chart i mentioned? i know it isnt to be taken as gospel but i can see the logic behind it and this is first study ive seen to contraindicate it

  10. #10
    Cravenmorehead is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    188
    Quote Originally Posted by DanB View Post
    yes i remember reading that study but i also read that there could of been other factors that contributed to that, ill try dig it up, have you seen the chart i mentioned? i know it isnt to be taken as gospel but i can see the logic behind it and this is first study ive seen to contraindicate it
    Yeah.....it shows a baseline GH level elevated with no pulsatile action I believe......can't remember where I saw it. I do know I'm starting to retain water so I'm backing off the peptides. Normally I'm dry as a bone. When the veins on the front of the lower leg aren't popping......I know it's time to re-examine the goodies.

  11. #11
    DanB is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    post proelia praemia
    Posts
    9,856
    pm sent . . . . . . . .

  12. #12
    Cravenmorehead is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    188
    CJC GHpulse around 10ng/ml......mod and -2 GH pulse around 100ng/ml......10x......is that good or bad?

  13. #13
    DanB is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    post proelia praemia
    Posts
    9,856
    i dont really know i guess we will find out in years to come lol

  14. #14
    Razor is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Carving Stone with Steel
    Posts
    7,787
    If once a week would work, this is great new for my gf. I just started giving her peptides to help heal some old injuries.
    She hates needles so this is idea for her.

    What does this mean Swifto? "A synthetic GHRH analog (CJC-1295) that
    binds permanently to endogenous albumin after injection ?
    Last edited by Razor; 01-21-2012 at 01:00 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •