Results 1 to 21 of 21
Thread: HGH VS rHGH
-
04-06-2004, 01:53 PM #1
HGH VS rHGH
Whats the difference? Is there a difference? Price, reults etc...
-
04-06-2004, 02:05 PM #2Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 129
Do you mean HGH vs. IGF- LR3?
If so look at the threads on this board and you will find the answers.
Captain Anabolic
-
04-06-2004, 02:13 PM #3
No, HGH VS rHGH.
I have been told they are different.
I have looked here before I posted.
-
04-06-2004, 02:32 PM #4
pituitary-derived human GH (hGH) and (rhgh) is recombinant DNA technology has 191 amino acid residues and a molecular weight of 22,125 daltons. The amino acid sequence of the product is identical to that of pituitary-derived human growth hormone . The protein is synthesized by a specific laboratory strain of E. coli as a precursor consisting of the rhGH molecule preceded by the secretion signal from an E. coli protein. This precursor is directed to the plasma membrane of the cell. The signal sequence is removed and the native protein is secreted into the periplasm so that the protein is folded appropriately as it is synthesized. So technically they are the same and unless you have major money for an effective cycle (4 months) stick to tha basics.....peace
Last edited by jbigdog69; 04-06-2004 at 02:48 PM.
-
04-06-2004, 02:50 PM #5Originally Posted by jbigdog69
In essence, every protein/peptide you'll buy these days could arbitrarily have a lower case "r" put before it indicating that it's recombinant, because they all are. HGH/rHGH....same thing.
One thing to note is that the 191 amino acid GH that is for sale is only ONE of the many forms of GH found nauturally in the body. It is the most prevalent form ( I believe it makes up about 40% of total GH), but there are other forms. That's why, once they figure out how to put the GH secretagogues on the market ( Like Merck's MK677), it'll be all the more valuable, as it will induce secretion of all the various forms of GH. In studies comparing exogenous GH administration vs administration of MK677 in doses that induce release of comparable quantities of GH, the MK677 group had significantly better results (body composition among other measured variables). I saw these clinical studies in a book. I'll see if I can find them online somewhere too and post them.
-
04-06-2004, 04:52 PM #6
I plan on using 8-10IU/Day for 6months, so $'s isnt a problem bigdog. The person who said they are different was the person who works at the factory that makes it. I just couldnt wait for thier reply. I'll see what they say.
-
04-06-2004, 04:54 PM #7Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 749
Originally Posted by einstein1905
this is interesting. i knew there were already some gh secretagogues on the supplement market, but i didn't know that a pharmaceutical company has been working on one. i am pretty sure that the ones otc are garbage. at least most of them. what stage is it in? now you got me interested.
-
04-06-2004, 05:05 PM #8Originally Posted by flexshack
-
04-06-2004, 05:09 PM #9Originally Posted by Mr Olympia
rHGH is simply another way to represent HGH. There may be some supplement company that has named their GH "secretagogue" formula rHGH for confusion's sake, and they could probably get away with it, but don't confuse that with actual GH/rHGH
-
04-06-2004, 05:11 PM #10Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 749
Originally Posted by einstein1905
-
04-06-2004, 09:40 PM #11
Im sorry to tell you guys wrong. They are two seperate things, they may be the same and work the same but must be something different in the manufacture or something, I will ask them exactly the difference, but they told me this:
"our RHGH is amino acids:191. RHGH is different with HGH due to their different origin. RHGH is more safe on use. now most of customers use RHGH instead of HGH."
It will be great if I have to cut back, then I could go for 9 months or something.
-
04-06-2004, 09:53 PM #12Originally Posted by Mr Olympia
-
04-06-2004, 10:23 PM #13
Im not being sarcastic. You think the poeple that make the stuff are wrong?
-
04-06-2004, 10:50 PM #14Originally Posted by Mr Olympia
-
04-07-2004, 12:28 AM #15
The person that told me was the person that works at the factory. He was a chinaman so his translation might be a bit off but he specificaly stated there was a difference.
"RHGH is different with HGH due to their different origin" - what does he mean by that?
-
04-07-2004, 01:14 AM #16Originally Posted by Mr Olympia
I'm sure when he explains it a little clearer, it'll all mesh together and make sense.
-
04-07-2004, 09:45 PM #17Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 50
i think he means ones synthetic and the old one were from cadavers, so technically ones a human patuitary gland and ones aa bonded together, same goes for insulin they used to extract it from animals(pigsetc..) but it caused Creutzfeld-Jakob disease so they had to make it synthetically
-
04-07-2004, 11:18 PM #18Originally Posted by mr.lean
-
04-07-2004, 11:36 PM #19
Yeah I think they meant HGH=192aa rHGH=191 where they told me the rHGH is safer.
-
04-08-2004, 06:00 AM #20New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 17
Originally Posted by einstein1905
This is how I percived it from the many Steroid Reviews I have read reguarding GH. Basically, choose the 191 chain if possible, and HGH was only extracted years ago from corpses, now it is recombinant, or rhGH......
-
04-08-2004, 10:31 AM #21
Warning!!!
Originally Posted by ozzyoil
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
cutting/ fat loss advice needed...
Yesterday, 01:34 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS