Printable View
i hope i'm not stepping out too far... since i just stated posting.
I've seen guys on this website(nothing against them, i think it's interesting), say they can tell whether someone is natural or not, simply by looking at them.
don't read into the question, or assume the answer by questioning my motivation, just look at the picture and vote.
im talking abou the guy in the thread i just posted....deberry
post his pics in the same thread you started the poll in, no need for 2 threads concerning the same matter
how tall is he he looks kinda short that makes a huge difference when judging pics
By looking at him it could go either way. Some people with genetics could easily look like that with some hard work. If I had to say, I would say he was natural.Quote:
Originally Posted by RageControl
I agree with Cmah9...natural
Quote:
Originally Posted by RageControl
he's 5'9", 212 LBS
yeah, he's natural. as amatter of fact he's only been training seriously for about six months, he's went from 190 to 212. he got his base, i swear to god, bench pressing, that's it, benching. every day in college. w/ the occasional tricep pushdown, never worked legs until six months ago, never worked back, traps, forearms, abs. he eats like a sedentary individual. the owner of the gym we work out at gave him a diet, but he hasn't been able to get it together yet. he's a superfreak.
Well if he is able to get on pace he could be huge. I has a great base, and seems to be naturally lean. That is a good combination. post some pics of him in a few months, so we can see if he develops any.Quote:
Originally Posted by alpha
I'd say natural.
if you're gonna tell us he's natural, then why the hell did you make this poll ??Quote:
Originally Posted by alpha
:unsure: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by KeyMastur
i probably shoulda let it go longer, impatient