Thread: I dont believe the anti E-hype
09-17-2005, 05:21 PM #1
I dont believe the anti E-hype
Am I Completely crazy to think that, when you take anti- E's, that the only reason you 'seem' to be 'hindering gains' is that you dont have the bloat, etc? Why else really would it hinder gains so much, other than not being bloated?...I Did a search on this and I couldnt really find any solid answers, so if theres a link explaining this, do share.
09-17-2005, 05:45 PM #2New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- in the land of no where
09-23-2005, 12:13 PM #3Originally Posted by offensive behavior
That is very un-true. First of all, even the stronger AI like arimidex and aromasin do not completly shut down estrogen conversion, only about 85%. You will, even with an AI, still produce a little estrodiol, enough to keep you within normal ranges. The reason people say it hinders gains is because they are dependant on the scale. They want to see their weight go up fast, even if it's water. If diet and training is go to go, then you will make wonderful gains even while using an AI. If you only knew the damage excess estrogen does within the body, you would never cycle without it.
09-23-2005, 04:32 PM #4
09-23-2005, 04:41 PM #5
Nolvadex has the ability to lower IGF levels. This is why people are worried about running anti-e's and hindering thier gains. IMO the gains being hindered are minimal and not worth the sides from not using aan anti-e.
09-23-2005, 08:32 PM #6
09-23-2005, 08:33 PM #7
sodium retention, should come from aldosterone.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)