Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Captain_test's Avatar
    Captain_test is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    208

    Question I dont believe the anti E-hype

    Am I Completely crazy to think that, when you take anti- E's, that the only reason you 'seem' to be 'hindering gains' is that you dont have the bloat, etc? Why else really would it hinder gains so much, other than not being bloated?...I Did a search on this and I couldnt really find any solid answers, so if theres a link explaining this, do share.

  2. #2
    offensive behavior is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    in the land of no where
    Posts
    15
    well i searched about that 2 .. what i read was that the steroid dont take its full potential to work when there is no estrogen and also read that estrogen also pose some anabolic effect

    and thats why the un armotizable steroids are some how less effective

  3. #3
    anabolicbruce's Avatar
    anabolicbruce is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Fl
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by offensive behavior
    well i searched about that 2 .. what i read was that the steroid dont take its full potential to work when there is no estrogen and also read that estrogen also pose some anabolic effect

    and thats why the un armotizable steroids are some how less effective

    That is very un-true. First of all, even the stronger AI like arimidex and aromasin do not completly shut down estrogen conversion, only about 85%. You will, even with an AI, still produce a little estrodiol, enough to keep you within normal ranges. The reason people say it hinders gains is because they are dependant on the scale. They want to see their weight go up fast, even if it's water. If diet and training is go to go, then you will make wonderful gains even while using an AI. If you only knew the damage excess estrogen does within the body, you would never cycle without it.

  4. #4
    G-13's Avatar
    G-13 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    718
    Im using .25 adex a day, is that enough for an andropen 500mg week cycle?

  5. #5
    TheMudMan's Avatar
    TheMudMan is offline Retired~ AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    10,714
    Nolvadex has the ability to lower IGF levels. This is why people are worried about running anti-e's and hindering thier gains. IMO the gains being hindered are minimal and not worth the sides from not using aan anti-e.

  6. #6
    oswaldosalcedo's Avatar
    oswaldosalcedo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,109
    Quote Originally Posted by anabolicbruce
    That is very un-true. First of all, even the stronger AI like arimidex and aromasin do not completly shut down estrogen conversion, only about 85%. You will, even with an AI, still produce a little estrodiol, enough to keep you within normal ranges. The reason people say it hinders gains is because they are dependant on the scale. They want to see their weight go up fast, even if it's water. If diet and training is go to go, then you will make wonderful gains even while using an AI. If you only knew the damage excess estrogen does within the body, you would never cycle without it.

    faslodex + nolvadex or evista are very near to 100 %
    but take estradiol blood test first.
    i can use test,but my estradiol levels,are low.
    dont need anti e´s

  7. #7
    oswaldosalcedo's Avatar
    oswaldosalcedo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,109
    sodium retention, should come from aldosterone.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •