Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. #1
    Prime's Avatar
    Prime is offline Naturally perfect
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Tropical England
    Posts
    3,531

    Questionable Poses

    Hmmmmm should these guys be hitting these poses? Ill start with an amusing one.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Questionable Poses-nazi-arnold.jpg  

  2. #2
    KGBnine is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Yorktown
    Posts
    3,623
    lol

  3. #3
    swing lo is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    110
    Why did arnolds legs look so small back in his day compared to the bber's of today?

  4. #4
    KGBnine is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Yorktown
    Posts
    3,623
    Quote Originally Posted by swing lo
    Why did arnolds legs look so small back in his day compared to the bber's of today?
    increased training,diet, and drug knowledge.

  5. #5
    I R Baboon's Avatar
    I R Baboon is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Border State
    Posts
    183
    oh man that pics classic

  6. #6
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    I must be stupid cause I dont get what is amusing with that pic ???

  7. #7
    I R Baboon's Avatar
    I R Baboon is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Border State
    Posts
    183
    The question is should these guys be hitting these poses, Arnold looks like hes Seig Heiling(sp?) in the picture.

  8. #8
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    Quote Originally Posted by I R Baboon
    The question is should these guys be hitting these poses, Arnold looks like hes Seig Heiling(sp?) in the picture.
    ahh right didnt make the nazi connection

    ohh well its still a beautifull pose and a tremendous pic

  9. #9
    Gorgoroth_'s Avatar
    Gorgoroth_ is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    313
    Quote Originally Posted by swing lo
    Why did arnolds legs look so small back in his day compared to the bber's of today?
    Thats pic was probably taken in the early 70's ....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Questionable Poses-4764arnold_-_coleman-med.jpg  

  10. #10
    nsa
    nsa is offline King of Supplements
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    east coast
    Posts
    5,484
    That pic ronnie and arnold is off, ronnie coleman is obviously photshopped in, but aside of that the picture of coleman was taken from further away than the picture he was cut and pasted into(anyone who's seen Coleman in person knows his head is not small from all that GH), thus making it seem even like a relatively close comparison between the two. When in reality he ronnie would blow arnold away, even in his prime. At i would have a hard time of comparing the two...

    Arnold:
    Height: 6'2"
    Arms: 22"
    Off Season Weight: Around 270 lbs.
    Competition Weight: Around 250 lbs.

    Ronnie:
    Height: 5'11"
    Arms: 22"
    Off Season Weight: About 330
    Competition Weight: 300

    Ronnie is giving up 3 inches in height and still easily crushes Arnold in total muscle mass.

  11. #11
    Prime's Avatar
    Prime is offline Naturally perfect
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Tropical England
    Posts
    3,531
    Quote Originally Posted by nsa
    That pic ronnie and arnold is off, ronnie coleman is obviously photshopped in, but aside of that the picture of coleman was taken from further away than the picture he was cut and pasted into(anyone who's seen Coleman in person knows his head is not small from all that GH), thus making it seem even like a relatively close comparison between the two. When in reality he ronnie would blow arnold away, even in his prime. At i would have a hard time of comparing the two...

    Arnold:
    Height: 6'2"
    Arms: 22"
    Off Season Weight: Around 270 lbs.
    Competition Weight: Around 250 lbs.

    Ronnie:
    Height: 5'11"
    Arms: 22"
    Off Season Weight: About 330
    Competition Weight: 300

    Ronnie is giving up 3 inches in height and still easily crushes Arnold in total muscle mass.
    lol it seems altho he's retired, arnold still seems to be growing. I dont believe arnolds arms were ever 22" From what ive picked up and read over the years, older stuff from the 80's and before seems to suggest his arms were about 20" more recent stuff has then at 21". I read a report by an official who measured both arnolds and sergio's arms. Arnolds came up at like 19 7/8ths" Sergio's were about 20 1/8th"

  12. #12
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    I thought ronnies arms where around 23,5 inches??

    I belive arnolds arms where 22 inches. Just look at all the pics(except that fake one with ronnie). Thats not 20 inch guns

  13. #13
    nsa
    nsa is offline King of Supplements
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    east coast
    Posts
    5,484
    Who knows what Ronnie is at now, guy is seriously starting to become in-human, which is cool i guess cuz thats what he's going for.

  14. #14
    bmwrob is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    537
    Quote Originally Posted by nsa
    That pic ronnie and arnold is off, ronnie coleman is obviously photshopped in, but aside of that the picture of coleman was taken from further away than the picture he was cut and pasted into(anyone who's seen Coleman in person knows his head is not small from all that GH), thus making it seem even like a relatively close comparison between the two. When in reality he ronnie would blow arnold away, even in his prime. At i would have a hard time of comparing the two...

    Arnold:
    Height: 6'2"
    Arms: 22"
    Off Season Weight: Around 270 lbs.
    Competition Weight: Around 250 lbs.

    Ronnie:
    Height: 5'11"
    Arms: 22"
    Off Season Weight: About 330
    Competition Weight: 300

    Ronnie is giving up 3 inches in height and still easily crushes Arnold in total muscle mass.
    DRUGS, DRUGS, AND MORE DRUGS...... That's why Ronnie is so much more massive than Arnold was. Also, wasn't Arnie in his early 20s when he started winning his Mr.Os? Wasn't Ronnie in his early to mid-thirties? So, an extra 10 years of training and juicing. I would take Arnolds physique any day of the week and twice on Sundays.

  15. #15
    bigrthanu is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    199
    Yes Arnold was already retiring when Ronnie was just becoming a monster. Arnold used BB to jumpstart his career as an actor, while ronnie used BB to become a freakin monster. I'm sure if arnold was ten or fifteen years younger he may have become more of a monster or if hollywood hadent taken him away he may have continued to train to grow. Money and fame were more important that becomeing more of a freak

  16. #16
    Gorgoroth_'s Avatar
    Gorgoroth_ is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    313
    Arnold's arms were 22 inches .

    Ronnies are currently 23.5 , or 24 inches.

    Arnold's don't look as impressive because they're not as compact as coleman's . Coleman's arms are smaller than arnold's length wise , thus the muscle is more compact .

    If Arnold had set out to become a " monster " he would have been the biggest ****ed monster out there but he was more interested in being symetrical and looking pretty. Who do you think is more popular with women ? Arnold , or Ronnie ?

    Ronnie is big and bad , but I do not think he would have totally belittled arnold even though arnold wasn't deadset on becoming a mass monster like ronnie is .

  17. #17
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    I think arnolds arms looks more impressive then colemans easily. He had the best looking biceps of all time imo. Colemans arms are big but "uggly" compered to arnols perfectly shaped arms. **** I sound like Im in love with arnie

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Chi-Town
    Posts
    1,708
    I love that pic.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Prop ED Builds Character
    Posts
    932
    actually arnolds competition weight was around 235-243....he was really really not nearly as big as the bodybuilders today. the two things that arnold had tho were the arms and calves. those are the two things that stood out form him. o and the fact his waist was only around 30 inches. he is my dream and i hope oneday i can be just like him.

  20. #20
    workdude's Avatar
    workdude is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,445
    Arnold is Da Man....

  21. #21
    TooSmall's Avatar
    TooSmall is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    ontario, canada
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by PlasticFuture112
    actually arnolds competition weight was around 235-243....he was really really not nearly as big as the bodybuilders today. the two things that arnold had tho were the arms and calves. those are the two things that stood out form him. o and the fact his waist was only around 30 inches. he is my dream and i hope oneday i can be just like him.
    his waist was around 34 inches if im not mistaken

  22. #22
    BeatofEvolution's Avatar
    BeatofEvolution is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Suffolk County, LI
    Posts
    18
    ARnold's arms were most definately 22" in his prime...if he had bigger triceps...forget about it...his biceps alone were marvelous...ronnie's arms are around 24" and thats not a far stretch...they are tremendous but its mostly his tricep that is humungous...arnold was NEVER 270 off season...closer to 250-260 at most...they didn't bulk in the 70's like they did in the 80's and 90's...if anything they were sometimes SMALLER because they didn't do 'roids int he off season...just look at arnie and zane at the art gallery pose after the olympia...they look a lot smaller...not eating, training or doing roids...a different mind set from todays world.

    arnie's arms were 20" in predator if you have ever seen the interview with jessie ventura when he and arnold held a contest who had the biggest biceps when shooting started...and arnold won by 2"...

    anyway... if you look at that pic you can't argue that arnold is more aesthetically pleasing and not emaciated compared to coleman...who is more massive and compact...arnold would not be blown offstage by any means...that pictures proves that he was a monster...
    '
    PS arnold was a 32' waist...

  23. #23
    Loomis is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6
    Actually in Arnold's "Encyclopedia of Bodybuilding" he states that at his most massive ever he was 245#.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •