08-13-2004, 03:42 PM #1
How many think Iran should be next???
How many of you think that because Iran Is our enemy and because they are devoloping nuclear weapons again and because alot of the people fighting in Iraq right now was sent by the Iranian Goverment. That now we should direct our attention towards Iran??
For anyone that says Iran is not our enemy. They have there school children shout death to america every morning after they do their exercises. They have been doing this for 20-30 years.
08-13-2004, 04:44 PM #2
Iran, then north korea, then Syria.... Then I'll be happy. That would wake a few other countries up!
08-13-2004, 07:20 PM #3
I honestly think Iran should have been the first target...
But it might be nice to finish the job in Irak first and then go back to afghanistan and finish that botched job (remember Osama? The biggest mass murderer in US history?) before attacking another country.
08-13-2004, 07:29 PM #4
Nuke them before they nuke us...Let's hope our politicians and generals do the right thing in time.
08-13-2004, 07:30 PM #5
draft anyone? if we are to attack any other countries be prepared for it. i wont be drafted **** that, id rather enlist
08-13-2004, 07:30 PM #6
OOH Me Me Me Me!!!! lol
08-13-2004, 07:31 PM #7
imo war is something every man should have to endure at some point in his life. how else do u measure ones life but with conflict
08-13-2004, 07:52 PM #8
Here's the point... I think at least. One of these days were all gonna wake up, and turn on the news and New York, LA, or Chicago is going to be flattened by a nuke some terrorist brought into the country. Sh*t if I can get a big ass pack of gear in with no prob... how hard is it to get a nuke in. What do you think the responce is gonna be from us... Well if John Kerry is in office he'll talk it over with the terrorist over some coffee. W..... well I have a feeling the Iran, Syiria, North Korea, and a few others would be flattened, and the news people would be covering that along with the remains of New York.... Bottom line
VOTE FOR BUSH IN 04
08-13-2004, 08:35 PM #9Originally Posted by Jdawg50
I dont think it is THAT EASY to bring in nuclear anything. Its not something they show on the news but we have satelites SOLELY DEVOTED to scanning for ANY and ALL nuclear activity. Satelites that can detect nulcear particles and even lead particles that terrorists hide it in. You can smuggle your big bag of gear in but put a nuclear bomb in with that gear and I promise it wont be so easy.
08-13-2004, 08:36 PM #10
i agree jdawg50. i definately think we shouldnt stop... also we should play the 9/11 clips every goddam night on the news and before sports so people dont forget what can/did happen. Iran/N korea/syria BUT we ARE doing things in afghan, mostly covert stuff i hear
08-13-2004, 08:37 PM #11Originally Posted by bermich
08-13-2004, 09:07 PM #12
just wait boys.... just wait
Its gonna happen
08-13-2004, 10:00 PM #13
Kill em all and let God sort em out! Vote Bush!
08-13-2004, 10:04 PM #14
You cant appease these people, Europe tried to appease Hitler and look what happened....... these people are no better than the Nazis... they are extreme right wing fascists and should be dealt with accordingly
08-14-2004, 06:11 AM #15Retired Vet
Originally Posted by Anhydro78
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
But I´d say this... first prevent a defeat in Iraq before turning your attentions to anywhere else. Do that, then take a long hard look a Bush´s war policies before committing more yuong Americans to a needless war. And don´t forget its not just Americans dying for Bush´s war for oil, British, Dutch, Polish and other nationalities have died for this stupid ass war.
Right almost beach time again, see you guys in another 10 days
08-14-2004, 07:26 AM #16
Ibiza.. mmmmmm Wish I was there
08-14-2004, 08:25 AM #17Originally Posted by Benches505
LMAO HAHAHAHAHHA Thats just sums it up. Do all americans think this way?!
Paranoid as ****, nuke them before they nuke us? What the hell is that, so what does that means that the UK shoud bomb everyone that MIGHT bomb us, if we develop nukes they can, if america makes nukes Iran has the right to, if america flexes its muscles every now and again Iran has the right to. You cannot have one rule for one and one for the other.
America has nukes, russia, england, europe, the world has nukes thats a fact. you cannot dictate who gets to keep them. unless you get rid of your own
08-14-2004, 09:10 AM #18
We CAN, DO and WILL dictate who gets them..........period. That's a fact of life.
08-14-2004, 10:22 AM #19Originally Posted by Jdawg50
May as well just blow up the entire western hemisphere. They're chock full of heathens, communists, and sabbath-breakers anyway.
Then might as well blow up Mexico to stop all this illegal immigration. Ya, if it's illegal, we've got the right to blow 'em up to kingdom come.
And Cuba, too. Castro on a good day doesn't look any better than Saddam Hussain did when he came out of his spider hole. He deserves to be nuked.
South America? Ya, we better nuke them, too, 'cause those idiots are burning down the rain forests, which are good for CO2/O2 levels.
Canada? They'd be about all that's left over, but they haven't gotten too far out of line--yet. But we should keep a close eye on 'em, and boy if they do get out of line, we better blow them up, too . . .
After that, there won't be anyone left to piss us off, and everything will be wonderful in the world again . . .
08-14-2004, 11:37 AM #20Originally Posted by 1victor
jesus u seriously do not have a clue. i hope to god that all americans dont think your way.
they should bomb the UK i spose then? We got Nukes... so has iran, iraq, russia, europe, asia... the list is endless
see the thing is you CANNOT dictate who has these weapons, you cannot turn around to Iran and say no your not having nukes if the states has them.
just like i cant exactly walk up to someone and say "stop f*cking swearing" do you see what i mean?
08-14-2004, 02:06 PM #21
UK reread my previous post, it stands.
08-14-2004, 03:06 PM #22Banned
Originally Posted by Anhydro78
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- The Resistance
this is absolutly amazing.
you're acting as if they hate you for no reason at all.
ofcourse the iranians hate the uk,us and most of the west we ****ed there country up.
here's a quick history lesson for those that are unaware :
#1941 Britain and the Soviet Union invade Iran, remove Reza Shah from power and put his son, Mohammed Reza, on the throne as the new Shah of Iran.
#1953 Dr Mossadeq is overthrown in a coup by pro-Shah officers with British and American assistance.
#1963 The Shah introduces his White Revolution - a package of social and economic reforms. He clamps down on secular and religious opponents and imprisons Ayatollah Khomeini.
#1964 Ayatollah Khomeini is sent into exile in Turkey for opposing a bill granting US military personnel diplomatic immunity. In 1965, he moves to Iraq where he remains until 1978.
#1979 February Ayatollah Khomeini returns as leader of the revolution. The armed forces announce their neutrality and the monarchy collapses. The Ayatollah takes power with Mehdi Bazargan as his prime minister.
Radical students occupy the American Embassy and hold 52 American diplomats hostage for 444 days.
then america starts a war betweem iraq and iran.
ofcourse they hate america and of course there children shout death to america nearly every thing bad that happened to them in the last 100 years is the fault of the british and america and some other countries in the west and also the west tried to steal there oil supplies.
08-14-2004, 03:08 PM #23Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- The Resistance
the british and the americans started the war against iran, the iranians are just trying to defend themselves from america and the west by building nukes.
08-14-2004, 04:15 PM #24
The thing with nukes is, i know we used the abomb before, but i highly doubt we would ever use nukes again unless we are at an official war with another country, not afghan or iraq (afghan and iraq we said we are freeing people). I think north korea is nuts and we shouldnt let them have nukes.
08-14-2004, 04:21 PM #25Originally Posted by cavemanspearchucker
that is the stupidest logic i think ive ever been witness to. I am now stupider for reading this. Excuse me while i kill a few more brain cells with an 18 pack..........
08-14-2004, 04:26 PM #26
The thing is, we've got politicians here in the US that favor building small nuclear bombs, AND using them. I read a newspaper story about this in the Dallas Morning News a week or so ago.
We've got a crop of politicians who feel that it is the United State's destiny to have dominion over the rest of the world, instead of regarding them as equals. I'm afraid that politicians who think like this are not above manipulating the American People to support the use of A-bombs to take what natural resources we need from them.
And . . . it's hellaciously presumptious for the American people to be telling other countries if the can or cannot have nuclear bombs. They are sovereign nations, after all, and not US territories like Puerto Rico.
08-14-2004, 05:48 PM #27
YES!! Iran is next. I have been saying that for about a year now. Think about it, we have the country surrounded. When it comes to Iran we should run not walk to that war. That way Iran will be where we went AND how we got there.
08-14-2004, 10:19 PM #28
My friends, we're already on the brink of a world war 3, and I dont know if we'll be around to write about this one in the history books. Too many countries have necular weapons, along with that, they have a major lack of care for civilization. They kill and slaughter their own people, they dont hesitate to go necular on us.
08-15-2004, 08:26 AM #29Retired Vet
Originally Posted by 1victor
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
I always said given half the chance Bush would be a dictator!.
Hi from the Balearic Islands again, another week of this vacation!. ETA planted 4 bombs here last week!. But I didn´t even notice, guess growing up in Ireland has its advantages!.
08-15-2004, 10:10 AM #30
WW3 is fastly approaching
08-15-2004, 02:51 PM #31
Just remember that Pakistan has nukes and they are an Islamic country... they are currently a "friend" of the US, but if push comes to shove are you 100% sure they'll side with us or their fellow Islamics?
Also with all the missing nukes from former USSR countries I'd be a little worries of who really does have the bomb...
I think it may be a bit too late to "dictate" who gets to have nukes... but I still think Iran should have been leveled back at the time of the hostage crisis. Now is too late.
08-15-2004, 03:04 PM #32
It's the golden rule. Whoever has the most........wins.
Yes these third world countries have nukes but we have the capabbility of intercepting them before they get to the U.S. and to counter big time.
No one is going to go nuclear except one of those third world countries that's why we need to "dictate" who gets nukes, the less that have them the better.
Quite frankly this planet is a cess pool and I wouldn't bother me one bit if it is blown sky high.
08-15-2004, 03:04 PM #33
Iran and N.Korea should be next
>>and France too
08-15-2004, 03:14 PM #34Originally Posted by Red Ketchup
Iran should have been dealt with long ago, Iraq should still be one of those countries on the hit list......we shouldn't be there right now IMO, but since we are, Bush needs to clean up his mess there before concentrating on anything else. All those other countries that have leaders who make up Hell's inner circle hopefully can wait.....I hope they can anyway, if N. Korea can go that long without doing something stupid.
08-15-2004, 06:35 PM #35
Well if the time comes, i'm ready fight.
08-15-2004, 07:35 PM #36Originally Posted by MESSY_UK
08-15-2004, 08:03 PM #37
I personally wouldnt have been offended if when 9/11 happen they just nuked the crap out of Afganistan. Thats all we would have to do and it would have been done. They wouldnt have wanted to play anymore. All they understand is power.
08-15-2004, 08:14 PM #38Originally Posted by Anhydro78
We should be doing what we are doing in Iraq in Afghanistan IMO, then bring it to a couple other countries to show we mean business. Not just random countries ( Canada is next on Bush's agenda I'm sure ), South Korea ect, just to show we don't mess around. If we are going to just say Screw You to the UN, lets at least take out some relevant bad guys.......
08-15-2004, 08:25 PM #39
That's why we have the Neutron Bomb... much less destructive to the environment..
Originally Posted by UrbanLegendThe answer to your every question
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
Why the Police will Kick your ass
08-15-2004, 09:04 PM #40
if we nuked afghanastan, we wouldnt have to worry about people harboring terrorists because people would be scared shatless to do so.....and bin laden would surely be dead.
john travolta said the best line i ever heard in any movie about terrorists in swordfish:
Stanley: War? Who are we at war with?
Gabriel: Anyone who impinges on America's freedom. Terrorist states, Stanley. Someone must bring their war to them. They bomb a church, we bomb 10. They hijack a plane, we take out an airport. They execute American tourist, we tactically nuke an entire city. Our job is to make terrorism so horrific that is becomes unthinkable to attack Americans.
THAT IS HOW WE SHOULD CONDUCT BUISNESS
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)