Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 28 of 28
  1. #1
    MilitiaGuy's Avatar
    MilitiaGuy is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Middle-East Lebanon
    Posts
    4,328

    Was Tsunami a natural disaster or man-made?

    There are many provable irregularities in the official American tsunami story that raise a lot of questions.

    It is beyond any doubt that a giant tidal wave smashed its way through South and South East Asia carrying on to the western shores of Africa.

    But the question which needs to be asked is whether this tsunami was a natural or man-made catastrophe?

    An earthquake measuring 6.4 on the Richter scale had hit the north of the Indonesian island of Sumatra. The Jakarta Geophysical Office meticulously noted that the epicenter of the event was located 155 miles south-southwest of Aceh Province.

    This location is approximately 250 miles south of the position later selected by the American NOAA, which plotted the epicenter to the north-west of Aceh, and initially claimed a Richter reading of 8.0 later upgrading the reading to 8.5, then to 8.9, and finally to 9.0.

    The first proven irregularities were being peddled by American officials at the NOAA, who suddenly invented a new 'flexible' peak seismic wave for the event, of far greater magnitude than Jakarta, when the Jakarta office was located much closer at almost point-blank range.

    It should be noted: there is no such thing as the new 'flexible' peak.

    The first seismic peak recorded is the only real peak, unless of course you later manually draw in a few more peaks of your own, to match a contrived agenda. Naturally there is also only one epicenter, which was faithfully recorded by dozens of Indonesian and Indian seismographs.

    Apart from the huge disparity in Richter values, the Indonesians and Indians were disturbed to find that the normal earthquake 'preamble' was missing from their seismograph charts.

    What this means is that the normal steadily increasing number of transverse shear "S" waves that always precede an earthquake were missing, as were later aftershocks, which likewise always accompany a naturally occurring or Tesla standing-wave generated earthquake.

    There were 'warnings' of aftershocks from the NOAA, but none actually occured.

    What it means in layman's terms is that an earthquake is always triggered by a resonant electromagnetic frequency in the range 0.5 to 12 Hertz, but it is not an instant process, because the resonant frequency must be precise.

    Thus as true resonance approaches, the fault line starts to tremble like a piece of rope under tension, and sends out warnings to the seismographs in the form of steadily increasing transverse shear waves.

    If all you get is a cluster of "P" compression waves, then one is most certainly looking at an underground or sub sea explosion. They were the only copious seismic signals that the Indonesians and Indians received, and they looked very similar to those generated many years ago by large underground nuclear weapons in Nevada.

    On the morning of 27 December, the Australian (New York owned) media was making it abundantly clear that the most badly hit nation in the region was Sri Lanka.

    Under the orders of one Wall Street "gentleman" based in Australia known as Little Johnny Howard, four Australian Hercules planes complete with troops, guns and other tackle, invaded Sumatra just south of the devastated province of Aceh.

    In turn, with 90% of its population killed by the tsunami, Aceh might perhaps one day soon become Indonesia's very own Guantanamo Bay, crawling with hundreds of heavily armed Australians and Americans.

    Needless to say the Australians were merely the advance party, soon to be joined by a curiously well prepared and equipped U.S. Military.
    Only a handful thought to question why they had been spending a whole year training for a "Humanitarian Mission", when the whole point of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps is normally to kill people in very large numbers.

    Seemingly by magic, on its part the Pentagon managed to have two battle groups ready to sail at an instant's notice from Hong Kong and Guam during the normally chaotic Christmas to New Year period.

    The next superbly orchestrated maneuver took place at sea. Out of Hong Kong rushed team one, comprised of the nuclear-powered USS Abraham Lincoln and her escort vessels, while the far more interesting team two rushed out of Guam, led by the USS Bonhomme Richard, a marine amphibious assault carrier crammed to the gunwales with gun-toting wooden tops.

    The move of the Pentagon didn't go down too well with the Indian Government who knew fully well this was not a "normal" earthquake. On 27 December India refused to join George Bush's planned exclusive 'club of four', which would have effectively pulled this Asian nuclear power out of its new coalition with Russia, China and Brazil.

    On 28 December the Indian Government politely warned the American military to stay clear of Indian sovereign territory.

    Despite having a huge number of tsunami victims in its own State of Tamil Nadu, India completely converted the survey ship INS Nirupak into a 50-bed floating hospital in less than 72 hours, then sent it unarmed to help the desperate people of Aceh in Indonesia.

    By direct comparison, America sent combat ships and armed Marines. The US Navy has two 1,000 bed hospital ships, the 'Comfort' and the 'Mercy', but neither one was dispatched. Though the USNS Comfort was deployed to New York when 3,000 Americans died in September 2001, this current lack of action sends a strong signal that 150,000 (mostly Muslim) dead in South East Asia, and half a million injured, are of no concern whatever to the power brokers in the U.S.

    To force subservience on Asia, and ensure the lion's share of incredibly lucrative reconstruction contracts, all that was needed was a very large tsunami targeted on the selected nations, which was easily within the capabilities of a large thermonuke.

    There is nothing new about "Sea Bursts" as they are called, and more than 30 years ago plans existed in both America and Russia to wipe out each other's coastal cities using exactly this technique. The tidal wave from a deep sea burst is relatively clean, allowing the aggressor to take over both land and remaining buildings with the minimum of delay.

    If everything had gone to plan, then Indonesia, Sri Lanka and India would have been in pawns to the IMF and World Bank for thirty or more years - time enough to wait for the price of oil to come down again after the lethal fiasco in Iraq.

    At the same time, if the Indian Government had taken the bait, the deadly Russian-Chinese-Indian-Brazilian coalition would have been dead in the water. Not a bad day's work for a single thermonuclear weapon discreetly removed from the decommissioning process.

  2. #2
    diesel21's Avatar
    diesel21 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    734
    scary ish, we will never know

  3. #3
    mark956101957's Avatar
    mark956101957 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    2,152
    The guy behind the grassy knoll!

  4. #4
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    Cant anyone do a search on how many nukes would be needed to cause a wave like that. Im not sure but I think it would require mind boggling megaton's.

  5. #5
    Angelis's Avatar
    Angelis is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Montreal (Canada eh!)
    Posts
    1,274
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    Cant anyone do a search on how many nukes would be needed to cause a wave like that. Im not sure but I think it would require mind boggling megaton's.
    You wouldnt be able to use nukes bcs that would contaminate the water... but im sure america and its allies had something to do with it. With all the technology they have now I wouldnt be surprised if they found a way to create earth quakes. But if it was done by bombs there had to be more than one and they would have to be set off in a precise sequence to "aim" the tidal wave somewhere, and those bombs had to have been pretty big someone must have seen something. I think new technology is at hand here and they saw a perfect oppurtunity to test it!

  6. #6
    Aboot's Avatar
    Aboot is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Not a well known name.
    Posts
    1,793
    Quote Originally Posted by Angelis
    You wouldnt be able to use nukes bcs that would contaminate the water... but im sure america and its allies had something to do with it. With all the technology they have now I wouldnt be surprised if they found a way to create earth quakes. But if it was done by bombs there had to be more than one and they would have to be set off in a precise sequence to "aim" the tidal wave somewhere, and those bombs had to have been pretty big someone must have seen something. I think new technology is at hand here and they saw a perfect oppurtunity to test it!

    Or it could have been a tsunami caused by an earthquake.

  7. #7
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    Quote Originally Posted by Angelis
    You wouldnt be able to use nukes bcs that would contaminate the water... but im sure america and its allies had something to do with it. With all the technology they have now I wouldnt be surprised if they found a way to create earth quakes. But if it was done by bombs there had to be more than one and they would have to be set off in a precise sequence to "aim" the tidal wave somewhere, and those bombs had to have been pretty big someone must have seen something. I think new technology is at hand here and they saw a perfect oppurtunity to test it!
    Well I for one would be VERY suprised if there was a way for us to create earthquakes and if the us has such equipment and wanted to try it why on earth would they do it against some of the most popular tourist resorts in the world. This is a conspircy theory totaly without reason.

    BTW if they wanted to do such a thing I dont think they would care about contaminating water. Hydrogen fusion bombs are acctualy relativly clean since the fission part is so small and the fusion doesnt create much waste. So it wouldnt make such a different in the ocean. The radioactive particles would spread out so much that they wouldnt hurt anything.

    Also if they wanted to cause a earthquake I recon they would have to drill the nukes down into the earth crust also limiting the radioactive waste that would be set lose into the ocean. But imagine what a HUGE project that would be. Something like 100 deep ocean drill holes each getting a nuke dropped into it. To many people would be involved for it to ever be keept a secret.

  8. #8
    Syndicate's Avatar
    Syndicate is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    484
    Anyone ever play the game "Metal Gear solid 2"? The whole government being a front for others running things behind a curtain.

  9. #9
    MilitiaGuy's Avatar
    MilitiaGuy is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Middle-East Lebanon
    Posts
    4,328
    u should play splinter cell :chaos theory

  10. #10
    Bigen12's Avatar
    Bigen12 is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    4,301
    I thought I'd add my 2cents in an attempt to help....

    Note: I marked the more applicable parts in Bold



    Paranoid Schizophrenia
    Function: noun
    : schizophrenia characterized especially by persecutory or grandiose delusions or hallucinations or by delusional jealousy

    paranoid schizophrenia

    n : a form of schizophrenia characterized by delusions (of persecution or grandeur or jealousy) ; symptoms may include anger and anxiety and aloofness and doubts about gender identity; unlike other types of schizophrenia the patients are usually presentable and (if delusions are not acted on) may function in an apparently normal manner [syn: paranoic type schizophrenia, paraphrenic schizophrenia, paraphrenia]



    Symptons
    • Depression (noted by everyone)
    Persecutory or grandiose delusions
    • Excessive sleeping or inability to sleep for long periods of time
    • Social withdrawal and isolation (noted by everyone)
    • Shift to unusual behavior; significant personality change
    • Deterioration of social relationships
    • Hyperactive or inactive (or alternating between the two)
    • Inability to concentrate or cope with minor problems
    Extreme religiosity or preoccupation with the occult
    • Hostility from one formerly passive and compliant Indifference or inflexible obstinancy
    • Dropping out of activities and life in general
    • Decline in academic or athletic performance
    • Accidents or self-imposed injuries (cutting oneself)
    • Drug or alcohol involvement with extreme or dramatic reactions
    • Forgetfulness and losing things
    • Devastated by peer disapproval
    • Deterioration and abandonment of personal hygeine
    • Noticeable and rapid weight loss
    • Attempts to escape through geographical changes; frequent moving or hitch-hiking trips (*for teens, I would add running away)
    • Excessive writing or printing without apparent meaning
    • Excessive need for acceptance
    • Inability to express joy
    • Inappropriate laughter
    • Bizarre behavior (hopping, wearing only torn clothing, applying strange make-up)
    • Irrational statements
    • Strange posturing
    • Refusing to touch anyone or certain things (*note- our son did this with a twist, if someone touched his things, he would throw them away because they were contaminated* cw)
    • Shaving head or removing body hair
    • Not blinking or blinking excessively. Staring

  11. #11
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    Holy shit I have alot of those symptoms

    I guess I have to stop shaving my head and bodyhair to make sure I become less paranodid

  12. #12
    CAUSASIAN's Avatar
    CAUSASIAN is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Chechnya
    Posts
    6,130
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigen12
    I thought I'd add my 2cents in an attempt to help....

    Note: I marked the more applicable parts in Bold
    In the movie the Matrix. You are basically Mr.Smith, conforming with what the system tells you.

    While people like MilitiaGuy are like Neo, always questioning things. People like him are true thinkers.

    And your a follower.

  13. #13
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    Causasian there is a different betwen beeing a thinker and doubting everything.
    This whole idea is pretty ridicilous.

    Im no nuke expert but if I remember right a ordinary earthquake release so much energy that it takes shitloads of nukes to do the same and this wasnt a ordinary earthquake it was the granddady of all earthquakes. Would be a gigantic project to drill all the holes, plant all the nukes ect. Not to mention every countries spy satelites would have picked upp on the blast and I dont think every country with spy satellites would keep there mouth shut. Im sure india has a couple of there own, china also.

  14. #14
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    If this conspiracy theory had a grain of truth then china, russia and brazil would be losers. With both china and russia having satelies they would have known what happened. Do you think the usa would be bold enough to piss on both china and russia at the same time while directly attacking india.

  15. #15
    Bigen12's Avatar
    Bigen12 is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    4,301
    Quote Originally Posted by CAUSASIAN
    In the movie the Matrix. You are basically Mr.Smith, conforming with what the system tells you.

    While people like MilitiaGuy are like Neo, always questioning things. People like him are true thinkers.

    And your a follower.
    Do you often think of yourself and your friends as mythical people, or people in the movies?

    Do you often dress up as these mythical people, and run around your living room, disturbing your neighbors?

    Do you lay in bed at night dreaming that you were a hero in one of the movies that you have recently watched?


    I simply offered my opinion, you can take it for what it's worth....

    I highly suggest you re-read the symptons and the definition, especially the following....

    [Persecutory or grandiose delusions

    Extreme religiosity or preoccupation with the occult
    persecutory or grandiose delusions or hallucinations or by delusional jealousy

    And especially,
    doubts about gender identity;

    I truly hope that in your delusional state you realize that I am joking….

  16. #16
    singern's Avatar
    singern is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Chicago/Israel
    Posts
    2,239
    Quote Originally Posted by CAUSASIAN
    In the movie the Matrix. You are basically Mr.Smith, conforming with what the system tells you.

    While people like MilitiaGuy are like Neo, always questioning things. People like him are true thinkers.

    And your a follower.
    I saw that movie trilogy, and Neo never blew up children in the name of religion, or ordered anybody to murder innocent people for his personal satisfaction. As for Mr. Smith, he was unplugged, making his own destiny by acting out his evil plan, on his own. And only the machines in the film were responsible for planning a catastrophe leading to mass death, equating to the idiotic conspiracy topic at hand.

    Are you sure you saw The Matrix? Cause you seem very confused
    Last edited by singern; 05-19-2005 at 11:45 AM.

  17. #17
    Angelis's Avatar
    Angelis is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Montreal (Canada eh!)
    Posts
    1,274
    Or it could have been a tsunami caused by an earthquake.
    I never said it couldnt be an earth quake... it was an earth quake but it wasnt a normal one so people are thinking what could have caused it. I was merely speculating it could be possible, I tend to think up realy wierd things... I used to write stories when I was younger, my imagination gets the best of me some times.

    But back to reality...

    Well I for one would be VERY suprised if there was a way for us to create earthquakes and if the us has such equipment and wanted to try it why on earth would they do it against some of the most popular tourist resorts in the world. This is a conspircy theory totaly without reason.

    BTW if they wanted to do such a thing I dont think they would care about contaminating water. Hydrogen fusion bombs are acctualy relativly clean since the fission part is so small and the fusion doesnt create much waste. So it wouldnt make such a different in the ocean. The radioactive particles would spread out so much that they wouldnt hurt anything.
    As for the Hydrogen Fusion Bomb and the radioactive particles flying to far to contaminate... yes it is way less radioactive then most nuclear devises but as far as I know when an underwater explosion happens the bomb explodes and then all the water would be sucked back into the vacum created by the
    explosion so the radioactive material would still be concentrated into one area.

    Also if they wanted to cause a earthquake I recon they would have to drill the nukes down into the earth crust also limiting the radioactive waste that would be set lose into the ocean. But imagine what a HUGE project that would be. Something like 100 deep ocean drill holes each getting a nuke dropped into it. To many people would be involved for it to ever be keept a secret.
    As for your 100 deap ocean holes it doesnt have to be like that either all u need is one realtively big nuclear bomb to be placed on a fault line and there you go... but that would have caused a noticable explosion readable by seismic device and since both these methods would have produced readable results it couldnt have been an explosion it would have to be someting else, unless someone is keeping they results under wraps.

    fission part is so small and the fusion doesnt create much waste
    Oh yeah last point here... particle fission and particle fusion are not the same thing.

    And bigen if you where talking to me I have almost none of those symptoms I was playing around and thinking up wierd things but we all know the government does keep secrets from us and test technology that we dont know about... planes for example they make them and test them and we only know about them 30 years later. The only symptoms I see that I do have are...

    Noticable and rapid weight loss (Caused by DNP )
    Depression (Who doesnt, I get depressed sometimes)


  18. #18
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    Quote Originally Posted by Angelis
    As for the Hydrogen Fusion Bomb and the radioactive particles flying to far to contaminate... yes it is way less radioactive then most nuclear devises but as far as I know when an underwater explosion happens the bomb explodes and then all the water would be sucked back into the vacum created by the
    explosion so the radioactive material would still be concentrated into one area.
    It would be concentrated for a while. a couple of days maby before the currents sweap it away. If yor pour a bucket of paint into the water it wont sit around creating a colored blotch for eternity.

    As for your 100 deap ocean holes it doesnt have to be like that either all u need is one realtively big nuclear bomb to be placed on a fault line and there you go... but that would have caused a noticable explosion readable by seismic device and since both these methods would have produced readable results it couldnt have been an explosion it would have to be someting else, unless someone is keeping they results under wraps.
    Exactly and by what other means can mankind produce the energy required to disturb a faultline. Technological breakthroughs like that cant be keept secret for to long. So a man made earthquake imo is out of the question.

    btw I dont think one big as nuke(if its nothing silly like 100+ megatons) would be enough but its just a guess


    Oh yeah last point here... particle fission and particle fusion are not the same thing.
    That is what I meant with my statement. But you must be aware that in a hydrogen bomb there is a traditional small fission bomb that triggers the hydrogen fusion. Thats what I meant with a small fission part(like in not much need for any big loads of uranium/plutonium). The fusion itself is very clean, fusion doesnt create any real ammounts of radioactive waste material, so any waste material would be from the fission bomb.

    And bigen if you where talking to me I have almost none of those symptoms I was playing around and thinking up wierd things but we all know the government does keep secrets from us and test technology that we dont know about... planes for example they make them and test them and we only know about them 30 years later. The only symptoms I see that I do have are...
    Planes is one thing, new technology so powerfull that it would be able to cause earthquakes is a whole different thing. It would have to be something far fetched like scalar electromagnetics that some lunatics think russia has lol

  19. #19
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    btw about it not beeing a "normal" earthquake. It might just be the fact that we havent seen many earthquakes of this magnitude. Wasnt this the second biggest muther****er since we started messuring them. Maby the big ones behave a bit differently then the smaller ones.

  20. #20
    Benches505's Avatar
    Benches505 is offline 75% HGH 25% Testosterone
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,366
    I can't believe someone wasted the time to write such nonsense! It goes to prove that no matter what we do to help these people they blame us for their misery. I say stop the aid going in and use it here in the states instead.

  21. #21
    Angelis's Avatar
    Angelis is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Montreal (Canada eh!)
    Posts
    1,274
    It would be concentrated for a while. a couple of days maby before the currents sweap it away. If yor pour a bucket of paint into the water it wont sit around creating a colored blotch for eternity.
    Thats what I was saying it would stay concentrated, I never said for how long, I just said they wouldnt spread out upon explosion like u said.

    Exactly and by what other means can mankind produce the energy required to disturb a faultline. Technological breakthroughs like that cant be keept secret for to long. So a man made earthquake imo is out of the question.
    Hey its the government were talking about here... they've been keeping secrets from us for a long time. They could keep this under wraps until they tested it (if it exists) and they can keep it under wraps after they tested it if they dont get caught.

    btw I dont think one big as nuke(if its nothing silly like 100+ megatons) would be enough but its just a guess
    Fault Lines are highly unstable it wouldnt take a massive nuke to disturb it just a good size one.

    That is what I meant with my statement. But you must be aware that in a hydrogen bomb there is a traditional small fission bomb that triggers the hydrogen fusion. Thats what I meant with a small fission part(like in not much need for any big loads of uranium/plutonium). The fusion itself is very clean, fusion doesnt create any real ammounts of radioactive waste material, so any waste material would be from the fission bomb.
    Yes I know the Neutrons from the atomic explosion cause the lithium to fission into helium, tritium, and energy. The atomic explosion also supplies the temperatures needed for the subsequent fusion of deuterium with tritium, and of tritium with tritium. Enough neutrons are produced in the fusion reactions to produce further fission in the core and to initiate fission in the tamper. I just didnt understand what you wher saying there wasnt really paying attention it was a long post skimmed some of it.

    Planes is one thing, new technology so powerfull that it would be able to cause earthquakes is a whole different thing. It would have to be something far fetched like scalar electromagnetics that some lunatics think russia has lol
    I dont think Scalar electromagnets would do it either they could produce massive thunder storms though (American Scientist played around with this back in the day but couldnt get it to work... no one knew about that back then either), but im no scientist so dont take my word for it. But if a country found a way to disturb the fault lines then they would be able to attack any country with a fault line below it.

    But thinking about it I revoke the thought of using nuke devices deep earth bcs that would also cause all local volcanoes to erupt as well. Would have to be energy based weapon.

  22. #22
    jc3's Avatar
    jc3
    jc3 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    739
    Here, how about this...

    I hate America so much I don't care if I look like an idiot posting this bull sh*t!!!

    There, now everyone can quit reading this thread and save themselves 5 minutes....

    JC

  23. #23
    Angelis's Avatar
    Angelis is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Montreal (Canada eh!)
    Posts
    1,274
    5 min it takes at least 5 min reading one of my posts but this thread is BS.

  24. #24
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    I think scalar electromagnetiks is just some kind if wierd story anyway. Since there is nothing in current physics that shows it could be possible. Atleast not the kinds of scalar electromagnetism I have read about.

    Im still not convinced a nuclear blast would be able to create a earthquake as massive as a 9 on the richter(sp?) scale. But since we both agree a nuke wasnt blown I guess its meaningsless to debate that

    But about the goverment beeing able to keep huge projects secret. Didnt they fail in keeping even the manhattan project secret? I dont know. When to many people get involved SOMEONE will talk. Its in human nature. Would only work if only a select few know the big picture and everyone else was working on parts that cant be traced to the purpose of the whole thing.

    BTW I think we are both underestimating eachothers inteligence and knoweledge by reading eachothers posts to fast lol. I have a lifelong passion for physics(and Im also studying it on university level but havent gotten into nuclear/particle physics yet, my main interest is astrophysics anyway).

    Anyway there must be other ways to create a earthquake. I remember reading(this was several years ago so dont qoute me on it)that if pumping down enormous(but not impossible)ammounts of viscous liquids down into faultlines sudden movements could be created. It was discussed as a way to prevent earthquakes by releasing the stuck upp energy in small portions but I guess it could also be used to create a purpose. But since the faultlines are under the sea I guess it would be a very very huge project. Maby if one key weakspot where found and all focus placed on that spot.

    But it would still involve several geologist, different kinds of scientiscts/enginers, lots of military ect. It would be a gigantic project and I dont know where the us goverment could find enough heartless bastards to create a tsunami that they know will kill over 100 000 inocent people, many tourists from allied countries. I just can not belive humans can be that evil. A select few maby. But not enough to get it to work.

  25. #25
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    here is some stuff about creating earthquakes but I have no clue how reliable it is since I have never heard of it before

    http://twm.co.nz/artquakes.htm

  26. #26
    Angelis's Avatar
    Angelis is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Montreal (Canada eh!)
    Posts
    1,274
    But about the goverment beeing able to keep huge projects secret. Didnt they fail in keeping even the manhattan project secret? I dont know. When to many people get involved SOMEONE will talk. Its in human nature. Would only work if only a select few know the big picture and everyone else was working on parts that cant be traced to the purpose of the whole thing.
    This is exactly what they do with most of there projects no one person knows everything... its a security risk.

    BTW I think we are both underestimating eachothers inteligence and knoweledge by reading eachothers posts to fast lol. I have a lifelong passion for physics(and Im also studying it on university level but havent gotten into nuclear/particle physics yet, my main interest is astrophysics anyway).
    True we have to start reading allot better if we are gonna have a good debate. I have the same passion for physics I found it interesting very young and did allot of research on it... I havent reached university physics level (not in school anyway), now I just prefer to do my own research. Allot easier and allot faster to get the info I want.

    Anyway there must be other ways to create a earthquake. I remember reading(this was several years ago so dont qoute me on it)that if pumping down enormous(but not impossible)ammounts of viscous liquids down into faultlines sudden movements could be created.It was discussed as a way to prevent earthquakes by releasing the stuck upp energy in small portions but I guess it could also be used to create a purpose. But since the faultlines are under the sea I guess it would be a very very huge project. Maby if one key weakspot where found and all focus placed on that spot.
    The only liquid I could think of that would do this would probably be Liquid Nitrogen. Most other liquid would just boil under the extreme heat.

    But it would still involve several geologist, different kinds of scientiscts/enginers, lots of military ect. It would be a gigantic project and I dont know where the us goverment could find enough heartless bastards to create a tsunami that they know will kill over 100 000 inocent people, many tourists from allied countries. I just can not belive humans can be that evil. A select few maby. But not enough to get it to work.
    They would if they thought it was only going to be used for defence of our country. Albert einstein created his nuke to help and it wasnt used the way he thought. After its all done you dont really need that many heartless, power hungry people to push the button.

  27. #27
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    14,223
    Quote Originally Posted by Angelis
    This is exactly what they do with most of there projects no one person knows everything... its a security risk.
    I guess. To bad we will never know


    True we have to start reading allot better if we are gonna have a good debate. I have the same passion for physics I found it interesting very young and did allot of research on it... I havent reached university physics level (not in school anyway), now I just prefer to do my own research. Allot easier and allot faster to get the info I want.
    First years of university sux anyway. LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS of calculus god damn Im about to puke. Have a huge ass calculus exam 4th june and next year Im gonna have alot of "fun" with linear algebra
    Only real physics I learned the first year is "classical/newtonian or whatever its called" mechanics and its boring as hell.

    The only liquid I could think of that would do this would probably be Liquid Nitrogen. Most other liquid would just boil under the extreme heat.
    Doesnt some solid materials act as liquids under high pressure. Just remembered that when reading this. Maby some kind of solid/liquid combination. I wish I could remember where I read about it it was interesting.


    They would if they thought it was only going to be used for defence of our country. Albert einstein created his nuke to help and it wasnt used the way he thought. After its all done you dont really need that many heartless, power hungry people to push the button.
    But what reason could they have for this. If they just wanted to try new technology they could do it in another part of the world where few would get hurt.

  28. #28
    Angelis's Avatar
    Angelis is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Montreal (Canada eh!)
    Posts
    1,274
    I guess. To bad we will never know
    Ya I know kinda sucks doesnt it... we only know what they tell us

    First years of university sux anyway. LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS of calculus god damn Im about to puke. Have a huge ass calculus exam 4th june and next year Im gonna have alot of "fun" with linear algebra
    Only real physics I learned the first year is "classical/newtonian or whatever its called" mechanics and its boring as hell.
    Yeah I wouldnt do it... to boring for me im on that has to be out doing something exceiting and dangerous. Part of the reason I decided to pursue a career as a Fire Fighter!

    Doesnt some solid materials act as liquids under high pressure. Just remembered that when reading this. Maby some kind of solid/liquid combination. I wish I could remember where I read about it it was interesting.
    Yeah if you ever find the site let me know sound interesting... but magma is basically heated metals and rock anyway so what way would that accomplish anything. The reason why I said Liquid nitrogen is bcs it freezes upon contact so massive amount could probably cause rapid temperature change and cause destabilization.

    But what reason could they have for this. If they just wanted to try new technology they could do it in another part of the world where few would get hurt.
    Just speculating here but if they did have such a device and they did use it that would be a perfect place. If they did actually deploy forces and create a base it would be a Strategic foothold for both offence and defence againt the Asia, Russia and Europe etc... They would have tested a new "toy" and gained a foothold in the eastern world.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •