Thread: Textbooks for Jihad
06-16-2005, 09:00 AM #1
Textbooks for Jihad
Militant Islamists in the United States and their allies have set their sights on our American children. They seek to provide an education similar to that taught in the controlled regimes of the Arab world.
It is well known that the Palestine Authority, Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Arab world use propaganda in their schools to support Islamic hegemony and stir up sentiment against Israel and the West. Students in the Middle East are taught to distrust Christians and Jews and are then taught to apply those lessons to opposing the free and democratic—and non-Muslim—nations of the world. These lessons serve to buttress the dictatorships of the Arab world. But now, prestigious American textbook publishers such as Prentice-Hall, Simon and Schuster, TCI and others are educating your child to the “Arab point of view” and its aspirations of world domination through what the Islamic world calls Dawa, a means of proselytizing unbelievers to the faith. They are doing this no matter how much that point of view may be distorted, farfetched or, in some extreme cases, outright lies.
06-16-2005, 09:08 AM #2
thats 100% true i was in an egyptian language skool so i know that shit happens........
06-16-2005, 09:10 AM #3
they have the right to do so u r free to believe in the religion or no, isnt USA a democracy?
06-16-2005, 09:24 AM #4
shit belongs in the bathroom , it should be flushed not taught in skools......JMO
06-16-2005, 09:31 AM #5Originally Posted by MilitiaGuy
We are also free to chose not to learn hate, needless incitement, conspiracy leis, and ridiculous justification for terrorism.
06-16-2005, 09:33 AM #6
ok dont learn it but u dont have the right to ban it, this is democracy.
06-16-2005, 09:48 AM #7Originally Posted by MilitiaGuy
That could be a grey area,
Especially teaching violence, would be against the law
06-16-2005, 09:51 AM #8
Abusive behavior, destructive culture, and violent ignorance must be monitored, and if need be restricted. Its the way we keep vile hateful groups like the KKK, Arian Nation, and such Islamic Jihadist groups under restricted control, and if need be made illegal.
All this was the result of the will of the people, in short, Democracy at its best.
06-16-2005, 09:54 AM #9
people will believe what their parents tell them. So inevitably most people will grow up to distrust white christians who've been invading their nieghbours for the past decade
dont get me wrong, if " Artillery Observation & Correction " starts being taught at the highschool level, i think its time to worry
06-16-2005, 10:02 AM #10
Our politically correct system allows it as "freedom of speech" and in a private school matter.
06-16-2005, 10:06 AM #11Originally Posted by 3Vandoo
Unless it falls under the definition of "HATE CRIME"
06-16-2005, 10:28 AM #12Member
Originally Posted by singern
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
Canada might be different bro.
06-16-2005, 10:42 AM #13Originally Posted by Slick Arrado
Sheez we are so politically correct here that we cannot say that russians lost more than the jews during WW2!
im serious, many many teachers, politicans and radio/tv hosts lost their jobs because they said the truth!
06-16-2005, 10:50 AM #14
who is that dumb human beeing that think jews lost more than russian!!!!??? really the zionist media is taking over everything in USA
06-16-2005, 10:54 AM #15Originally Posted by MilitiaGuy
Who said more jews were killed?
06-16-2005, 10:58 AM #16Originally Posted by roidattack
No one did, he is only running with it to drive home his illogical hatred.
06-16-2005, 01:45 PM #17Originally Posted by singern
I did, Russians lost more than 25 millions people during the war!
Here in Montreal, some university teachers said something like this
"WW2, about 60-70 millions people died, the one that suffered the most are the russians who lost about 22 millions people, way in front of the six millions that the Jewish communities lost. Actually it is sad that we only think only the jews lost so much during the war when in fact many more, like the chinese and korean lost enourmly more"
lost his job because the school got sued by N'ath Br'tna (sp) the canadian jewish congress!
I have 10 of stories like this, PC PC PC PC!!
PC is killing the western world!
Im moving to Militiadude flat soon
06-16-2005, 01:47 PM #18Originally Posted by singern
Opps, never mind I did not
06-16-2005, 01:49 PM #19Originally Posted by 3Vandoo
06-16-2005, 05:33 PM #20Originally Posted by 3Vandoo
But please what does your Nations political policy have to do with any of this.
I dont think so...
06-16-2005, 06:21 PM #21Originally Posted by singern
the was dedicated toward my reply!
and my nation? WHAT nation, canadian doesnt even exist, we're now the garbage can of the 3rd world countries!
06-16-2005, 06:28 PM #22Originally Posted by 3Vandoo
I think the confusion comes in as follows: 25 million is clearly more than 6 million. The relevant difference is the majority of the 25 million were killed on the battlefield in the war started by Hitler. The 6 million were simply civilians rounded up and put into death camps just for being jews. War dead is different than holocaust dead.
06-16-2005, 07:43 PM #23Originally Posted by kis55
Truth but we never heard about the homosexual, gympsy, bohemians, mentally retarded, and so on that where also exterminated in the same camps as the jews!
06-18-2005, 07:01 PM #24
How about we hear more about the killing fields in Cambodia and less about the Jews??........Why don't we?......because the Southeast Asians are looked upon as less human and less important than the poor Jews killed in the holocaust. Same with the multitudes of dead in Africa lost to starvation and civil war.
06-18-2005, 07:33 PM #25Originally Posted by Badgerman
Actually no! I would say better marketing by the "community"
06-19-2005, 01:54 AM #26Originally Posted by Badgerman
It is difficult to prove direct cause and effect connections between the power of a lobby and America's foreign policy positions. But, in the Middle East, it is hard to explain America's failure to pressure Israel into a final land-for-peace settlement-particularly since the Oslo deal in 1993-without factoring in the Israel lobby. The influence of the lobby may be easier to detect in the way U.S. positions have shifted on more specific totems of the conflict. For example, Israeli settlements in the occupied territories were regarded as illegal during the Carter administration. Under Reagan, they shifted to being an "obstacle" to peace and are now just a complicating actor. Similarly, East Jerusalem vas considered by the U.S. to be part of the occupied territories but recently its status has become rather more ambiguous.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)