08-16-2005, 08:05 AM #1
Inside Iran's Secret War for Iraq
Inside Iran's Secret War for Iraq
A TIME investigation reveals the Tehran regime's strategy to gain influence in Iraq--and why U.S. troops may now face greater dangers as a result
By MICHAEL WARE/BAGHDAD
SUBSCRIBE TO TIMEPRINTE-MAILMORE BY AUTHOR
Posted Monday, Aug. 15, 2005
The U.S. Military's new nemesis in Iraq is named Abu Mustafa al-Sheibani, and he is not a Baathist or a member of al-Qaeda. He is working for Iran. According to a U.S. military-intelligence document obtained by TIME, al-Sheibani heads a network of insurgents created by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps with the express purpose of committing violence against U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq. Over the past eight months, his group has introduced a new breed of roadside bomb more lethal than any seen before; based on a design from the Iranian-backed Lebanese militia Hizballah, the weapon employs "shaped" explosive charges that can punch through a battle tank's armor like a fist through the wall. According to the document, the U.S. believes al-Sheibani's team consists of 280 members, divided into 17 bombmaking teams and death squads. The U.S. believes they train in Lebanon, in Baghdad's predominantly Shi'ite Sadr City district and "in another country" and have detonated at least 37 bombs against U.S. forces this year in Baghdad alone.
Since the start of the insurgency in Iraq, the most persistent danger to U.S. troops has come from the Sunni Arab insurgents and terrorists who roam the center and west of the country. But some U.S. officials are worried about a potentially greater challenge to order in Iraq and U.S. interests there: the growing influence of Iran. With an elected Shi'ite-dominated government in place in Baghdad and the U.S. preoccupied with quelling the Sunni-led insurgency, the Iranian regime has deepened its imprint on the political and social fabric of Iraq, buying influence in the new Iraqi government, running intelligence-gathering networks and funneling money and guns to Shi'ite militant groups--all with the aim of fostering a Shi'ite-run state friendly to Iran. In parts of southern Iraq, fundamentalist Shi'ite militias--some of them funded and armed by Iran--have imposed restrictions on the daily lives of Iraqis, banning alcohol and curbing the rights of women. Iraq's Shi'ite leaders, including Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, have tried to forge a strategic ******** with Tehran, even seeking to have Iranians recognized as a minority group under Iraq's proposed constitution. "We have to think anything we tell or share with the Iraqi government ends up in Tehran," says a Western diplomat.
Perhaps most troubling are signs that the rising influence of Iran--a country with which Iraq waged an eight-year war and whose brand of theocracy most Iraqis reject--is exacerbating sectarian tensions between Sunnis and Shi'ites, pulling Iraq closer to all-out civil war. And while top intelligence officials have sought to play down any state-sponsored role by Tehran's regime in directing violence against the coalition, the emergence of al-Sheibani has cast greater suspicion on Iran. Coalition sources told TIME that it was one of al-Sheibani's devices that killed three British soldiers in Amarah last month. "One suspects this would have to have a higher degree of approval [in Tehran]," says a senior U.S. military official in Baghdad. The official says the U.S. believes that Iran has brokered a partnership between Iraqi Shi'ite militants and Hizballah and facilitated the import of sophisticated weapons that are killing and wounding U.S. and British troops. "It is true that weapons clearly, unambiguously, from Iran have been found in Iraq," Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said last week.
08-16-2005, 08:12 AM #2
Iran is not stupid, it appears they are doing exactly what we would do...
08-16-2005, 09:13 AM #3Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
If I were Iran I would do something similiar.
Because if the US had quick sucess in Iraq they would fight Iran, if the US has troubles in Iraq they would think twice to go into Iran.
Although this is smart for Iran, I think its a real risky move if they are doing it. Because getting caught would mean a excuse for America to fight Iran.
08-16-2005, 09:20 AM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
thats why in a year or so iran will feel the power of the us military might when we go in to destroy their nuke programs..
08-16-2005, 09:26 AM #5
I think its just a propaganda to hit Iran and disarm hezbollah , its clear they have connected hezbollah and Iran with the issue , it just an article that affect people like gotbeer.
08-16-2005, 09:57 AM #6Originally Posted by gotbeer
Seems to me Iran just had democratic elections too.....what's the excuse this time???.......more new weapons to try out on brown people???
08-16-2005, 10:05 AM #7Originally Posted by Badgerman
08-16-2005, 10:58 AM #8Originally Posted by gotbeer
08-16-2005, 11:14 AM #9Originally Posted by zOaib
08-16-2005, 12:17 PM #10Originally Posted by CAUSASIAN
08-16-2005, 12:30 PM #11Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
08-16-2005, 01:05 PM #12
Any military attack involving the loss of American life in Iran would cause Vietnam-size civil disobedience and protest.
Russia nad China currently support Iran, and will continue to do so if we attack them. We can't win in Iran, nor should we.
08-16-2005, 07:15 PM #13Originally Posted by inheritmylife
08-16-2005, 07:41 PM #14Originally Posted by zOaib
08-16-2005, 08:38 PM #15Originally Posted by zOaib
I could be friends and it sucks to fight friends.
08-16-2005, 10:54 PM #16
An inteligence document that the reporter got hold on?
MAOIUHAHAHAHA! It was released to fit a propaganda issue, sheez nothing had changed!
let's blame Iran and link them to all the shit in Iraq and bomb them and later on say "we'll there no connections, bad bad CIA!!!"
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)