Thread: The Pentagon on 9/11
11-28-2005, 06:50 PM #1
The Pentagon on 9/11
Check out this video. It's about 5-9 minutes long. It's well worth the watch.
11-28-2005, 07:54 PM #2
All governments are corrupt and dont care about people, but just themselves and money and power. Americans, Arabs, Chechens, Russians etc.
The Iraq war started in the beginning of 2003, out of curiousity I was looking at the stock of Halliburton. Look how it jumped from the beginning of 2003 to today. Almost a 60 dollar jump.
11-28-2005, 07:57 PM #3Originally Posted by Super_Stacked_Pimp
nahh it was a boieng 747 , dude ................... i believe BUSH ALL THE WAY !!! i dont have to watch stupid videos , i have blind faith in the dude !!
11-28-2005, 08:07 PM #4
Didnt you watch "Loose change"?
That is the sole valid video out there.
11-28-2005, 08:12 PM #5
11-28-2005, 08:14 PM #6
Yup thats the one.
11-29-2005, 02:36 AM #7
Sometimes, things are what they seem and not everything is a conspiracy
11-29-2005, 04:42 AM #8
if this is the vid that says it was a missile that went into the pentagon, its totally bs! i lived there and many friends helped at the crash site...
11-29-2005, 05:05 AM #9Originally Posted by max2extreme
and did anyone of them found any parts relative to a supposed boeing 747 ???? cause i cannot find any pictures of the parts anywhere , just pictures of a hole in the pentagon .
11-29-2005, 10:24 AM #10
I remember seeing a clip of a jet fighter crashing into a concrete wall. The force of the impact was so big that the entire jet craft was turned into dust. I tried to find the clip but cant. It looked realy cool.
So if the boeing that hit the pentagon had high speed it would be very hard to find any parts that can be identified as a part from the plane. But thats only if the speed is high enough offcourse.
11-29-2005, 10:31 AM #11
11-29-2005, 04:29 PM #12Originally Posted by johan
11-29-2005, 04:36 PM #13
11-29-2005, 06:05 PM #14Originally Posted by johan
over the many world boeing 747 crashes , there is no wall so thick that would make a whole boeing disintegrate and no pieces left , there is no way !
11-29-2005, 06:09 PM #15Originally Posted by wolfyEVH
thx for bringing this up i was lookign for that link myself !
11-29-2005, 06:39 PM #16
Read this too, it's a quote from the Rumsfield article. It shows how it's not true that a plane will just disintegrate into thin air. Which is pretty hard to believe anyways.
DNA is an organic molecule that is very fragile, easily destroyed by high temperatures. Not finding the large metallic pieces that would indicate a Boeing 757, the government explained that they were burned up in the intense blaze that consumed the aircraft. Then how does human tissue survive when 600 lb metal engines cannot? Can't have it both ways. So how trustworthy can the government evidence be?
11-29-2005, 11:30 PM #17Originally Posted by zOaib
well in all those crashes the pilot wasnt intentionaly trying to hit the ground or a building. Has anyone estimated the speed of the boeing when it hit the pentagon? Thats all a material enginger would need to calculate if the impact would disintegrate it.
Also it wouldnt have to be completely disintegrated. But I dont think people where separating building rubble from aircraft parts. Everything probably was thrown away. I dont think its easy to know what is what.
11-29-2005, 11:35 PM #18Originally Posted by Super_Stacked_Pimp
worms survived the columbia shuttle accident. So wierd things can be left untouched.
If you dont belive that a plane can disitegrate watch the link I posted! Nothing would be identifiable on that plane in the link I can tell you that.
The kinetic energy of the impact is just larger than the molecular bond strenght.
Im not saying Im sure this is what happened to the boeing. But parts of it probably did. It all depends on the speed of the muther****er.
11-29-2005, 11:40 PM #19
betwen the fire, the building rubble and parts just getting smashed to oblivion I dont think it would be easy knowing what is what.
11-30-2005, 12:22 AM #20
I read the article with Rumsfeld's comment about missile and it seems that he was talking about the plane being used as a missile and not an actual one. In this sense, the word "missile" has been used dozens of times in describing 9/11 attacks.
11-30-2005, 12:25 AM #21Originally Posted by johan
11-30-2005, 12:58 AM #22Originally Posted by johan
Last edited by wolfyEVH; 11-30-2005 at 01:00 AM.
11-30-2005, 02:42 AM #23
my dad worked at the pentagon during that time. It was a plane peroid.
11-30-2005, 03:15 AM #24Originally Posted by Hokies
11-30-2005, 04:30 AM #25
I ran a search and found this:
Didn't read it all though. Just looked at the pics.
I also ran a search and found a pic of an El Al 747 crash (much bigger plane) in Amsterdam. Looks similar...
11-30-2005, 07:32 AM #26Originally Posted by johan
11-30-2005, 07:34 AM #27Originally Posted by Hokies
why did the secret services took all videos correlating to the crash in the pentagon , from the area , gas stations , hotels etc etc .................. what r they trying to hide ..................
11-30-2005, 07:39 AM #28Originally Posted by zOaib
I think a more pertinent question is: How did the US government manage to keep under wraps the hundreds of police, firefighters, NTSB, etc, witness statements? It's simply not possible.
11-30-2005, 11:42 AM #29Originally Posted by AIZ
ever seen the movie , " ENEMY OF THE STATE" your answer lies there !
11-30-2005, 11:43 AM #30
i am not big on conspiracy theories , but factual stuff yes , and the fact is U.S.A is capable of doing anythign and everything , i dont need proof , i know it to be true , the history speaks for itself !
11-30-2005, 11:52 AM #31Originally Posted by zOaib
Some debri should be fund yes IF someone where looking. But if a plane has hit the pentagon and the mofo is on fire I think they would want to put the fire out and then get rid of the rubble to rebuild. I dont think they would flip every spec of dust to se if it belongs to the building or to the plane.
Originally Posted by zOaib
11-30-2005, 02:52 PM #32Originally Posted by zOaib
Great example of Hollywood BS: Ever seen the movie The Kingdom of Heaven...or something like that (about the Crusades)? Ridley Scott claimed that the movie is authentic in its facts and he sticks to it. Why not, right? Millions go and see the film and are influenced by it. What does it matter that there are academics who spend their lives dedicated to the historicity of the Crusades who claim that the movie's authenticity on a scale of 1-10 is a 2. Scott even changed the main character's nationality, occupation, and how his life ended. The queen in the movie never had a relationship with the main character, let alone returned to his homeland. The point: what Hollywood says...goes! It's F'in sad.
11-30-2005, 02:57 PM #33Originally Posted by zOaib
11-30-2005, 04:00 PM #34
i find it interresting that all the info that is presented here (that i saw) is from conspiracy theory websites.
none of those sites provide facts. they provide an alternative story to the truth that people will take as fact.
11-30-2005, 04:11 PM #35
Come on there are still pieces of the plane that should remain as in the wings, the engines and the black box. The size of the hole is what 10X10 feet? Where is the video evidence? Look at the live reporting on sept 11, on CNN, MSNBC, ppl near he crash site(numerous ppl) claim not seeing a plane.
What about the fvcking phone calls from 10,000 feet? Yet calls were made with a success ration of less then 1% One caller quoted as saying his full name. How many of you call your mom and say "Hi mom this is John Bordeau, Im just calling to say.....".
How bout Bin Laden wearing Jewlery, how bout Bin Laden writing with the wrong hand? Its ludicrous and utterly feeble in composition
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)