Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ar-r Nolva

  1. #1
    BOSLEY is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    14

    Ar-r Nolva

    New to AR and AR-R . Will AR-R nolva alone be a good anti-e or do you have to use it with something? Is it just as good as any other nolva? Please reply.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    956Vette is offline AR-Elite Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    10,530
    Blog Entries
    1
    Welcome. This is a difficult question to answer not knowing any details on what you are using, etc. But yes, AR-R 's nolv is good.

    to get the answers you need in terms of what anti-e's you should look into during/after go to the steriod forum

  3. #3
    BOSLEY is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    14
    will ar-r 's nova be just as reliable as pharmacy nova to prevent gyno and other estrogen sideeffects on a all test cycle?

  4. #4
    KeyMastur is offline VET
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    7,424
    i'm sure the angels can tell you just as well as i can, that AR's nolva is just as reliable as a pharmacy - only cheaper.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    10,925
    but Nolva is not what you want to use to control estrogen sides ..you want Letrozole it will in many cases reverse Gyno. ..nolva ( tamoxifen ) best used for PCt

    Letrozol is femera, which is an anti-estrogen.

    Femara is 10-30x more effective than Arimidex in it's ability to pass thru the cell membrane of lipid (fat) cells and inhibit the activity of aromatase -- in other words, Femara is far superior in lowering estrogen levels in fat cells. This has two benefits for BBs; (1) Estrogen 'attracts' water, so less water retention (2) an average male BB is around 10%BF, that's a lot of lipid cells with aromatase inside them, so a substantial percentage of aromatase is left untouched by Arimidex due to it's poor ability to enter lipid cells Arimidex is approximately 80% effective at inhibiting aromatase, Femara is around 95-97%

    notes:
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 Jul;85(7):2370-7
    2. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1997 Nov-Dec;63(4-6):261-7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •