Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By MuscleInk

Thread: Presenting evidence that thymosin beta 4 (TB500) may cause cancer growth

  1. #1
    jg42058p's Avatar
    jg42058p is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    684

    Presenting evidence that thymosin beta 4 (TB500) may cause cancer growth

    After thorough investigation on the effects of thymosin beta 4, I have found many scientific medical journals presenting evidence that thymosin beta 4 (the main ingredient in TB500), plays a powerful role in the development, spread and activation of cancer tumors in the body. Scientific articles have described that thymosin beta 4 may actually activate tumors that are benign and make your body begin to spread cancer. In fact, if you type in thymosin beta 4 on google, the auto complete that comes after actually fills in the word cancer for you.

    This is an extreme risk - your life. After my own research on attempting to heal my injuries, I have decided not to take TB500. Its is simply not worth the risk.

    Even though users may not develop cancer right away, as it is known cancer can take a long time to develop. Thus years down the line after using TB500, the grim reaper could answer your call. You don't know what the odds of this happening are, but it is clearly a possibility. Is healing an injury quickly worth risking your life?

    some people will not enjoy reading this, but science is science. Consider this very carefully before you take TB500.

    links

    Thymosin beta4 regulates migration of colon cancer cells
    Thymosin beta4 regulates migration of colon... [Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010] - PubMed - NCBI


    thymosin beta4 increases pseudopodia formation in LNCaP prostate cancer cells
    Overexpression of thymosin beta4 increases p... [Biol Pharm Bull. 2009] - PubMed - NCBI



    thymosin beta 4 linked to cancer
    Thymosin Beta-4 linked to cancer | BigFooty AFL Forum



    Thymosin β-4 in colorectal cancer is localized predominantly at the invasion front in tumor cells undergoing epithelial mesenchymal transition

    https://www.landesbioscience.com/jou...article/18691/


    overexpression of Tβ4 resulted in an increased metastatic capacity of lung cancer cells and increased angiogenic response
    Thymosin β4 has tumor suppressive effects and its decreased expression results in poor prognosis and decreased survival in multiple myeloma

  2. #2
    Red Bastard's Avatar
    Red Bastard is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    874
    Similar to the cancer promoting effects of HGH?

  3. #3
    bartman314's Avatar
    bartman314 is offline Productive Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    788
    thank you for providing the info... it's important to know all risk factors as well as benefits.

  4. #4
    MuscleInk's Avatar
    MuscleInk is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,449
    It's a field of interest. There is growing evidence that over expression of thymosin beta 4, 10, and 15 CORRELATE with cellular proliferation and angiogenesis in tumor cells which may or may not be specific to GIST cell lines. It's not entirely clear if thymosin over expression drives tumor growth or if the over expression is a consequence of growth. Thymosin is being examined as a diagnostic marker as well as a therapeutic pathway.

    The same arguments for cancer are seen with insulin , insulin growth factor (IGF), HGH, and anything that increases over expression and up regulation of androgenic receptors.
    Red Bastard likes this.

  5. #5
    bartman314's Avatar
    bartman314 is offline Productive Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    788
    muscleink, far point, and you are obviously knowledgeable about this stuff (i've read many of your posts and really appreciate your views!).

    in this context then, i'm wondering if you have guidelines you would recommend (or use yourself) to balance the benefits and the risks to decide what to try in the advancing/emerging fields of peptides, steroids , and other supplements.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    somewhere on earth
    Posts
    1,355
    Quote Originally Posted by bartman314 View Post
    muscleink, far point, and you are obviously knowledgeable about this stuff (i've read many of your posts and really appreciate your views!).

    in this context then, i'm wondering if you have guidelines you would recommend (or use yourself) to balance the benefits and the risks to decide what to try in the advancing/emerging fields of peptides, steroids, and other supplements.
    Only use them. When you HAVE to. Its really as simple as that.

  7. #7
    bartman314's Avatar
    bartman314 is offline Productive Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    788
    right... so, i'll lay it out.

    i'm 50 yo, lifelong athlete, recovering from recent motorcycle crash with the following ailments:

    arthritis: left and right knees (both have had acl reconstruction), right hip (repair labral tear) & right shoulder
    severe traumatic arthritis: left shoulder (you should hear it when i do lat pull downs - it's so loud people near me stop and stare)
    chronic recurring tendonitis: both knees/elbows

    used to be a runner - not doing that anymore due to knees and hips.
    current lifter, have backed way off on weight - lift now for fitness and as much size and strength as my joints will sustain (i occasionally go too far - get tendonitis and then back off)
    have stopped military's, incline bench and squats due to shoulders, hips, knees.

    lost 15 lbs of muscle in 4 weeks due to motorcycle crash (5 broken ribs, broken scapula, blah, blah...)

    started trt/hrt 3 weeks ago concurrent with doc's green light to get back in the gym.

    anyways, HAVE to is a trade-off between strengthening joints/decreasing joint pain that will help me achieve/maintain fitness/lifestyle goals with increasing possible risks of use of peptides beyond grhp2/sermorelin. tb500 seems like the next obvious move and then this pops up. hmmmm... what to do, what to do.

    i'll certainly be continuing research here (this forum is by far the most informative, balanced and effective i have found!), and would appreciate any specific thoughts by you/others in my case.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •