Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: R-ALA vs ALA

  1. #1
    hatchblack is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    in Denial
    Posts
    483

    R-ALA vs ALA

    I realize that R-ALA is supposedly more effective but does anyone have an idea as to how much more effective. It is a lot more expensive than the old ALA

  2. #2
    hatchblack is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    in Denial
    Posts
    483
    bump...?

  3. #3
    magicstick2003's Avatar
    magicstick2003 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,070
    Quote Originally Posted by hatchblack
    I realize that R-ALA is supposedly more effective but does anyone have an idea as to how much more effective. It is a lot more expensive than the old ALA
    there's plenty of info on it if you search... i too was wondering the same thing and found it in an older thread ( i don;t recall which one). I believe it has somethign to do with the r-ala being the raw product and so it is more efficient in the body. take a look back in the old threads though and you can find out how much more effective and such...(one thing i just found is that some take upwards of 1000mg of ala whereas only300-500 is needed with the r-ala.. also you need biotin with rala

  4. #4
    Bryan2's Avatar
    Bryan2 is offline Supplement Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,746
    yeah i always heard about 3 times effective

    look into s o d if you just want antioxitant properties supposedly stronger but doesnt protect liver

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,668

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •