vitargo Vs no-xplode

**supplement freak** · 12-19-2004, 01:17 AM

i tried vitargo by nutrix. its one of the best creatines i've ever used... has anyone tried both of these creatines?

which one is better? money is not an issue here...

**supplement freak** · 12-19-2004, 12:51 PM

bump

**nsa** · 12-19-2004, 12:52 PM

Vitargo is better...

**supplement freak** · 12-19-2004, 01:03 PM

nsa i dont really care if a get a crazy pump during the workout like people say they get with no-xplode.. im looking for long tern results i wanna gain lean mass while im on creatine.. do people gain a lot of muscle while on no-xplode? or they just get crazy pumps while working out???

**nsa** · 12-19-2004, 02:48 PM

Vitargo is what you want.

**suzuki99** · 12-19-2004, 03:58 PM

righ now im using vitargo and its great, i have used celltec and wasnt to happy with it. Im interested to see what people who have used both vitargo and noxplode have to say.

**unclemoney** · 12-19-2004, 07:23 PM

What about v12 turbo... tried that stuff it works pretty good.

**supplement freak** · 12-20-2004, 01:32 AM

Originally Posted by suzuki99

righ now im using vitargo and its great, i have used celltec and wasnt to happy with it. Im interested to see what people who have used both vitargo and noxplode have to say.

i have the same question for u as SUZUKI does.. anyone used vitargo and no-xplode?

how do they compare???

by the way thanks NSA..
nsa why would u recommened vitargo over no-xplode?

**nsa** · 12-20-2004, 03:11 AM

Because everyone i know who has used vitargo has not tried anything else after. Once my friends have used vitargo they're hooked on it. And the one buddy of mine who used no-xplode first then tried vitargo said that no-xplode yeilded better pumps than vitargo (but not by much) in the gym and did nothing to increase muscle mass.