Thread: pump tech vs No xplode
-
04-20-2005, 09:02 PM #1
pump tech vs No xplode
if im correct these 2 products r claiming to do the same thing, Ive used No2 and it sucked, i saw n felt no results, which of these 2 is better, ne one know?
-
04-20-2005, 09:11 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 1,218
if you did not like no2 then you will not like pump tech as it is the same thing. No xplode is a lil different but nothing drastic
-
04-20-2005, 10:19 PM #3
i used no explod and loved it.....and if you stack it with cell mass its supposed to be sick!
-
04-20-2005, 10:22 PM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 1,218
i am about to do that mass stack by bsn just cause i had some extra cash. well let yall know how it does
-
04-21-2005, 12:37 PM #5
aboslutly msn, def keep up posted on it, is cell mass a creatine???
-
04-21-2005, 12:42 PM #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 1,218
yea cell mass is creatine, its CEE
-
04-21-2005, 12:51 PM #7
yea i just looked it up, not a bad combo, someone should now stack cell-tech with pump-tech and see which one is better. I just read all the user reviews on cell-mass and arent so hot. keep us posted, maybe a cheaper CEE would be jsut as good
Last edited by Machdiesel; 04-21-2005 at 01:06 PM.
-
04-21-2005, 01:25 PM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 1,218
where did you read the reviews at??/? i have heard good things about it.
-
04-21-2005, 01:27 PM #9
I've heard both good and bad reviews althought I have yet to try CEE.
-
04-21-2005, 02:27 PM #10
seems like no xplode is the real deal, but cell mass can easily be switched with a cheaper cee
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Next cycle... Just...
Yesterday, 08:17 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS