Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: CLA useless?

  1. #1
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359

    CLA useless?

    Does this study indicate that cla is useless for fatloss purposes?

    Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation in humans: effects on fatty acid and glycerol kinetics.

    Zambell KL, Horn WF, Keim NL.

    USDA/Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Department of Exercise Science, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.

    Recent studies with mouse adipocytes have shown that dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) may reduce body fat by increasing lipolysis. The present study examined the effect of CLA supplementation on fatty acid and glycerol kinetics in six healthy, adult women who were participating in a controlled metabolic ward study. These women were fed six CLA capsules per day (3.9 g/d) for 64 d following a baseline period of 30 d. The subjects were confined to a metabolic suite for the entire 94-d study, where diet and activity were controlled and held constant. The rate of appearance (Ra) of glycerol, which indicates lipolytic rates, was similar at baseline and after 4 wk of CLA supplementation at rest (1.87 +/- 0.21 and 2.00 +/- 0.39 micromol/kg/min, respectively) and during exercise (7.12 +/- 0.74 and 6.40 +/- 0.99 micromol/kg/min, respectively). Likewise, the Ra of free fatty acids (FFA) was not significantly different after 4 wk of dietary CLA at rest (2.72 +/- 0.06 and 2.74 +/- 0.12 micromol/kg/min, respectively) or during exercise (6.99 +/- 0.40 and 5.88 +/- 0.29 micromol/kg/min, respectively). CLA supplementation also had no effect on the percentage of FFA released from lipolysis that were re-esterified. The apparent rate of FFA re-esterification was 65.2 +/- 4.2% at rest and 32.1 +/- 3.44% during exercise. Four weeks of CLA supplementation had no significant effect on fatty acid or glycerol metabolism in healthy, weight-stable, adult women.
    Publication Types:
    Clinical Trial
    Randomized Controlled Trial

    PMID: 11592726 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

  2. #2
    Bryan2's Avatar
    Bryan2 is offline Supplement Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,592
    there are many studies like this showing CLA is ineefective but feedback seems good so I dont know???

  3. #3
    swoll4589's Avatar
    swoll4589 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The Great State of Texas
    Posts
    715
    Isnt it relatively cheap... so it prolly wouldnt hurt to take it with ECA. Only thing is if you take it with ECA there will be no way to tell if its the ECA or the CLA that burning the fat. So i guess the only way to know is test it by itself.

  4. #4
    prolangtum's Avatar
    prolangtum is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,426
    its actually fairly expensive, and is not worth whatever minimal results you may achieve. The studies Ive seen are about 60/30 sucks/works.

  5. #5
    Big M's Avatar
    Big M is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    268
    Doesn´nt work!! just go with omega-3 buddy

  6. #6
    Rock88's Avatar
    Rock88 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    110
    Well, I guess I'm the only one. It worked for me at 4 grams a day.

  7. #7
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Maby the timespan of the study was to short. Rock88 how long did you take it and when did you notice a difference?

    To bad its SO damn expensive that any experiemtns on my own is impossible.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •