Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    fitnessNY's Avatar
    fitnessNY is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,929

    What is better K-R ALA, R-ALA or ALA

    Which one of these are better?

  2. #2
    Bryan2's Avatar
    Bryan2 is offline Supplement Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,746
    k-rala because it is more stable to temperatures and light

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,668
    Quote Originally Posted by Bryan2
    k-rala because it is more stable to temperatures and light
    there is actually no evidence of this, that is the claim of the american distributor. There are also bioavailability and purity issues with k-rala. It is widely known that k-rala is made using extraction as opposed to synthesis with an average yield of 80/20 r/s.

  4. #4
    zOaib's Avatar
    zOaib is offline VET
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Kingdom Of Heaven !
    Posts
    2,739
    Quote Originally Posted by macrophage69alpha
    there is actually no evidence of this, that is the claim of the american distributor. There are also bioavailability and purity issues with k-rala. It is widely known that k-rala is made using extraction as opposed to synthesis with an average yield of 80/20 r/s.
    totally agree there have tried several diff. kinds of alpha lipolic acid , but GLUCOPHASE XR by DS has worked the best , i believe it has more bioavailablity than anything on the market .

  5. #5
    turanabol is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    16
    I have to respectfully disagree. I use the brand you are referring to with very noticable affect.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •