Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    tryn2getripped is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    bend,oregon
    Posts
    26

    Hurry!! Trac creatine or cell-tech?

    which one? ive never taken either one. i know celltech is popular but has anyone taken trac? is it any good? i really need to know cause im going to go get some right now.

  2. #2
    jerseymeathead is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    56
    as i said in an earlier post go EAS synthvol2. you CAN"T go wrong. take one hour before you lift. nuff said. cell tech is crap. i've used it for a month and i think it is very overated and extremely expensive for what your getting.

  3. #3
    tryn2getripped is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    bend,oregon
    Posts
    26
    well i went with the cell tech. i work at gnc so i got a huge discount. i got the 80 dollar 7 lb jug for 40 bucks. so hopefully it works for me. i dont like the amount of sugar in it, but its dextrose and not fructose or some other worse sugars so i think it will be ok.

  4. #4
    tt333 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,474
    I'd go with the Cell-Tech too.

  5. #5
    nickrizz's Avatar
    nickrizz is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    North Jersey
    Posts
    2,690
    I took Cell-Tech and hated it it has way too much sugar in it. I heard PhosphagenX (not sure of the name) is ok, but i love trac. There is no "loading" and no sugar in it, plus it tastes great.

  6. #6
    BIG TEXAN's Avatar
    BIG TEXAN is offline Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    6,509
    Cell-tech has way to much sugar and I've heard nothing but good things about trac, which I was told has no sugar added.

  7. #7
    Za_S|ick is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    42
    Originally posted by tryn2getripped
    well i went with the cell tech. i work at gnc so i got a huge discount. i got the 80 dollar 7 lb jug for 40 bucks. so hopefully it works for me. i dont like the amount of sugar in it, but its dextrose and not fructose or some other worse sugars so i think it will be ok.
    Fructose is not a bad sugar, don't be fooled by muscletech's bullshit! Syntvol2 seems to contain more ingredients that help the transport of creatine into the muscles...

  8. #8
    doa8 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    19
    I took trac nitrogen creatine and saw no results, but then again I have never responded well to creatine.

  9. #9
    bigsexy is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    25
    I would reccommend cell-tech, it did work well for me.

  10. #10
    EXCESS's Avatar
    EXCESS is offline Retired Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    4,449
    Honestly, get yourself some plain old creatine powder. I've used almost everything on the market, and while some of them do work (Celltech), most aren't worth the price. Stay away from creatine serum because its total crap. For creatine you don't need to spend more to get quality results. You'll either respond to it or you won't respond at all.

  11. #11
    FmRommel's Avatar
    FmRommel is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    628
    Between the two id go with celltech, but if i had another choice i would have to just say..... buy cheap creatine, dextrose, ALA and make your own!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •